Look at this shit (first paragraph of body of article):

“Automatic watches are admired for their intricate mechanics and timeless appeal, but even the finest timepieces can sometimes run fast or slow. If you’ve noticed your automatic watch gaining or losing time, you’re not.”

First search result on DDG. Thank you, automatic watch expert and real person Hnin Oo Thazin. We may need a whole ass new internet.

https://mtscwatch.com/blog/why-your-automatic-watch-runs-fast-or-slow-and-how-to-fix-it

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    This existed before LLMs grew popular. It’s sweatshop written filler, to game Google’s algorithm since it ranks long answers higher.

    Unfortunately, this SEO “style” with giant padded answers may be why newer LLMs write the way they do, as they were trained on it.

    • sauerkrautsaul@lemmus.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      yeah that all makes sense

      It is an interesting question why explanatory and instruction-type websites all seem similar. In this article we will take a deep dive on how this came to be the case.

  • Hildegarde
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    Whenever I need to look up general information, I filter to only show pages from before 2022. It removes the AI trash instantly.

    Most general topics haven’t changed appreciably in the past 3 years.

    • snowsuit2654
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’ve been doing the same thing but I’m still having some AI results pop up even with this. Maybe people are faking the publish date on their site or something, I don’t know.

      • quick_snail@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        Books are being written with AI. Legislation is being written with AI. Lawyer arguments are being written with AI. Scholarly research is being written with AI.

        Pretty sure it’s not just the internet.

    • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I imagine a future where children speak of the “before times” and how when there was information on a thing called “paper” and how it wasn’t created by slop generators.

  • Cactopuses@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s by no means a great article, but I don’t think the sentence (or the article at a glance) was generated; it’s missing the word “alone” (If you’ve noticed your automatic watch gaining or losing time, you’re not alone) which is a distinctly human typo. I will say it absolutely lacks proofreading.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    It was happening well before AI with shitty content-scraping “solution” sites. Some even put [SOLVED] in the page title. AI is just a compounding problem.

    • sauerkrautsaul@lemmus.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      while I dislike that youre asking we constrict our collective digital sphincter in order to take less of a massive diarrhea shit on everything that AI is and represents, you’ve got a point

  • Steen @discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I read an interesting analogy recently:

    Imagine the world before cars. Now imagine an American company suddenly releasing 100 billion cars all over the world for everyone to drive. There are no roads, signs, lights, rules, laws or pedestrian crossings.

    That’s kind of the situation with AI now.

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I don’t think we can overestimate the impact this “knowledge collapse” will have yet. Thank goodness for the fediverse, not that it is immune but holy shit the rest of the internet and ALL of corporate social media sure has gone to the dumps fast hasn’t it…

    The general reduction in quality of search engine results in the last 2-3 years alone is sobering.

    I think it is tantamount to a mass delusion that people refuse to think about the fact that social media will tear society apart unless it is structured in at the very least a semi-decentralized federated fashion not under the control of one or two massive corporations. It feels like for my whole life I have had conversations like this with people and most often people just don’t care, they would rather be under a more convenient and more centralized authority. Regardless it is no less surreal to me than it must be to those people in denial about this that we are seeing the unavoidable consequences of refusing to understand a crisis of centralization rip our societies apart into violence and bigotry.

    • Fmstrat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Thank goodness for before:2023. For instance, this particular search has no requirement for modern answers.

    • Diurnambule@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is why I hasted my self hosted adventure. I have to selfhost before everything go to crap

      • Diurnambule@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        And the craziest thing, is that I got ads in my servers logs. Some company think it is a good thing to advertise in http headers and cookies while scanning all ports

    • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 days ago

      Unfortunately canning and recipes in general are now concerning and I have to worry about food safety so much more!

      • TriangleSpecialist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Can’t speak for canning, but for the recipes in particular, I was really shocked at the state of things the first time I looked at a recipe on an English website (not my first language).

        I only look at recipes in my native language, partly because of the fact that this bullshit is not yet generalised and a fair few website have them still in a good format.

        If that’s not the case for you, maybe translating a foreign recipe would help? Don’t know how long for though…

        • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Canning now boils down to for me, “only use the sites you know are safe” and it’s annoying.

          Maybe it’s just back to physical cookbooks again!

          • TriangleSpecialist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            I went back to my mum’s method of writing down the recipes I like in a dedicated notebook… Does not help with finding new things, but it does with having to skip slop in recipes I want to do again.

  • BurntWits@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 days ago

    As someone who actually knows a thing or two about automatic watches, I decided to give it a read. While the info is actually not as awful as I thought (no hallucinations surprisingly), I still would not recommend it as a guide, even if it were written by a human. Especially this part:

    2.  Demagnetize:
    If your watch suddenly starts running fast, have it demagnetized.

    While, yes, a magnetized movement will cause it to suddenly run fast, demagnetizing a movement isn’t completely harmless. If you’re wrong and the movement isn’t magnetized and instead a different type of damage, attempting to demagnetize it will actually magnetize it, and the combination of a magnetized movement plus whatever other damage caused the movement to run fast suddenly could be far worse. I think an added disclaimer would be helpful here. There are ways to test if a movement is magnetized, that should be mentioned. Blanket recommending demagnetizing a movement without a disclaimer is dangerous. I know this is written by AI and not a human but that part really bugged me.

    • sauerkrautsaul@lemmus.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      well thats the thing, its crap written by an LLM. I read the first paragraph then went and found an article written by a person, but Id say a good percentage of people would read the whole damn thing and take it as fact.

      personally ive always objected to the term hallucination for these LLMs fucking up. its not hallucinating, its shitty computer code outputting shitty output

      for what its worth, I just needed to manually wind my watch a bunch. I just had it bequeathed to me and didnt know anything about them. keeping time now of course

    • Gladaed@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Considering you gave the article a high factuality rating, may it be supervised AI output?

      • BurntWits@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I mean, it’s still missing a bunch of important info, it’s just that it’s not saying anything incorrect necessarily. In general anyway I’d just always steer clear of LLMs though regardless of the situation.

  • RonnyZittledong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    3 days ago

    Between SEO garbage and AI slop the internet is fucked. As a 42 year old dude who fell in love with the internet and programming in the late 90’s and made a good living at making websites up until about 5 years ago it really hurts. Nothing is left of what I loved about it. The giant conglomocorps have taken everything over and turned it all to shit. Oh well… Old man shakes fist at sky I guess…

    • diegantobass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      No no no no. We are legion. You are not alone. Let them have it. Here, have some popcorn while we watch our ship of Theseus go down in flames. Beautiful isn’t it. Now, what would you like to build next? Imagine the possibilities!

      Same age, same story, same feeling. But somehow, I think we should cheer each others up.

    • sauerkrautsaul@lemmus.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      ah, I think we just need to adapt. there has always been counter culture, and every opportunity to suck any culturally relevant thing dry will happen, as you’ve observed. so, new spaces need to be cultivated ya know? I think lemmy is one of em to a certain extent, although it is already a little under siege

  • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 days ago

    As opposed to a manual watch that I have to advance every second?

    (yes yes I’m sure they’re referring to a watch you don’t have to wind but like, who has ever referred to anything as an “automatic watch”?)

    • UselessRN@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      3 days ago

      This is to differentiate watches you have to wind. It’s automatic winding rather than manual winding. It’s lingo that has stuck around since watches became a common item. All watches were manual winding at first. Then the automatic winding watches came out. Then the quartz battery. We still have all these types of watches but to differentiate they’re called quartz, automatic, manual.

    • sauerkrautsaul@lemmus.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      yeah so thats just what they’re called. its the parlance for a watch that winds itself. you used to have to wind them every day of course, then these came along and “automatic winding watch”, shortened to “automatic” has always been the term industry and marketing have used. sometimes they are called self-winding, but Ive heard “automatic” nearly every time. there’s also quartz movement, which uses a battery

  • AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 days ago

    We may need a whole ass new internet.

    I’d be down if we left the clearweb to the corpos and moved all the human interaction to maybe something like Usenet or I2P.

    I would say I’d even be down to learn Gopher protocol, but I looked up their website and they have their own memecoin, so I’m hesitant based off that alone. Even if they say it has no intrinsic value.

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      You don’t think they wouldn’t ruin that too if that was by some miracle where all the human capital went?

      Their plan is to make your internet useless and your PC unaffordable so you have to subscribe to their AI and ask it everything; so they can know everything about you and get ahead of stories that make them look bad, from time to time maybe even kill people.

      You will own nothing, and they will force you to like it.

    • bravesirrbn ☑️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      https://geminiprotocol.net/ (has nothing to do whatsoever, and predates, the Google AI product with the same name)

      Gemini is a new internet technology supporting an electronic library of interconnected text documents. That’s not a new idea, but it’s not old fashioned either. It’s timeless, and deserves tools which treat it as a first class concept, not a vestigial corner case. Gemini isn’t about innovation or disruption, it’s about providing some respite for those who feel the internet has been disrupted enough already. We’re not out to change the world or destroy other technologies. We are out to build a lightweight online space where documents are just documents, in the interests of every reader’s privacy, attention and bandwidth.

  • quick_snail@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Super ironic how unaware you are.

    You’re ruining lemmy by posting screenshots of headlines. GET OUT.

    • sauerkrautsaul@lemmus.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      l linked to the article. I also copied some of the copy as well. I posed a screen shot of the part that I wanted to share, meaning the visual bit that I intended other people to see as part of my post.

      I looked at your comments, and not all, but in many of them you just kinda insult people and insinuate that you’re smarter than everyone else. If you want to spend your time doing that, thats your prerogative and everything of course, but I’d ask you to ask yourself if anyone is going to take the points you’re making when you come off like a prick

      • quick_snail@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m doing my part to make this a better place.

        If you’re going to be posting images of headlines, you’re doing the opposite. Stop.

        • sauerkrautsaul@lemmus.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          you have made 0 posts and about 1500 comments. you wander around lemmy saying snarky things and criticizing something. you’ve decided on your own that you know what is right and wrong and you go around telling people your opinion and coming off like a bossy self righteous little shit. I do believe you think youre a force for good … or something, but I encourage you to think about how you talk to people cause mostly you’re just pissing people off.

    • Gladaed@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because it unnecessarily increases hosting costs which may put the community in peril?