

“dominus est spiritus sanctus” means “the lord is the holy ghost”. “espritu” does not exist as a word in Latin and “dominus sanctum” doesn’t make sense as the former is nominative and the latter accusative. I’m intrigued by the intended phrase though, because usually you’d say “In nomine patris et filii et spiritus sancti” to say “in the name of the father, the son, and the holy ghost”. Maybe that was what they were going for?







Warum zieht man die Hosts nicht zur Rechenschaft? Identifikationspflicht im Internet schränkt die Freiheit der BürgerInnen ein. Aber hey, Hauptsache YouTube, Pornhub und xmCo beschützen.