Yeah i got thos feature request multiple times i tried to begin with but it always failed. Wiml have to look further.

Let me know if there is something missing. I am always open for feature requests.

I would not be against merging the projects, and yeah i thought for future releases i would like to integrate rkhunter or similar tools too.

It will be priced as it isnt locking you into a ecosystem like meta, so it will be of course a bit more pricey. ( rumors say roughly 1200$ )

I have recovered it for now. As at least the public accessible informations are only indicating a training facility.

Lemmy moderation tools are of course lacking, but as the lemmy devs once said they arent even touching anything moderation related for “the future”.

You can set it to private so that only lemmy.world users can see and post things there. But “hidding” it for anyone like a unlisted post on mastodon is currently not possible.

Yep the ui uses the api

A brainrot game with ingame purchases won against megacorps, because they didnt allow the brainrot to have their own brainrot in-game purhases.

Depends on the version of the instance you are exporting it.

Lemmy UI:

In your settings and click “Export” on the Import / Export Settings section

Then it downloads a json containing your Blocks. It “should” be importable but i never heard any feedback about it. It can of course not block people that are in not federated instances.

I mean thats semi true they have less things that they sell you after a purchase of a licnese to a game. E.g. dlc’s or similar. Still they can brick your system any second if they thought you inserted anything they dont like. Thats just a huge predatory step against any consumer rights.

(•_•)

I mean yes but sadly this will definitly affect others too as nowadays with globalism other companies see this and say hey people really buy any sh*t if you do it like nintendo, even cashgrabs.

I have lost faith in humanity. When people just keep buying scams like these they are getting just rewarded for such predatory practices.

Ok great!

Hmm thats then a issue with piefed. Is there any message shown?

No the other part the moving of the chat is a little bit controversial too. But that is ok. The other change in that commit

We removed firefox relay for now. You can retry now.

Ahh yes, that is another risk factor of him. He never tests it. I guess he always goes for guts instincts. ( As there is no CI tests or any type hints ).

And again we speak of FORMATTING pr’s those risky formatting pr’s i guess he tested that? and somehow found that it didnt worked?

Just to be clear, i fixed a lot of bugs already too. E.g. Mastodon login never even worked ONCE, i implemented that to the end.
With his merge first fix later attitude, for little bit more established servers its killing argument: Oh yeah feature X broke because no one tested it before.

My PRs were in good faith. I was ok with constructive feedback ( e.g. change this, change that ) but dismissing ones PR MULTIPLE times. With almost none real reason other than “Opiniated Formatting” ( where none exists )

I mean i gave him the changes to his feet and he kicked them away. I know it were small changes but if i have to argue around for 4-5 session to implement basic formatting ( a one and done thing ). I would blick him too.