• scutiger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      3 years ago

      Sure, they’re against it, but if it gets implemented by Chrome and by many major websites, they won’t have a choice but to implement it as well. Otherwise, their browser just won’t work and people will have to use Chromium browsers or nothing at all.

      • empireOfLove@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        3 years ago

        Honestly, they could have good grounds for an antitrust lawsuit if this API comes to pass and everyone uses Google attestation servers. It’s gardenwalling the browser space just like Microsoft was.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          3 years ago

          Honestly, they could have good grounds for an antitrust lawsuit

          And what was the last successful antitrust suit? It wasn’t Microsoft. They just dragged out the trial until they had a favorable administration settle with them.

        • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 years ago

          That would be a great anti trust suit if the US actually enforced anti trust laws, but they don’t. If you’re not already a dominant semi-monopoly, you can buy and do whatever honestly.

        • scutiger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          3 years ago

          The whole point is that non-Chromium browsers might lose functionality on a significant portion of major websites. Imagine if Amazon, Netflix, and Youtube suddenly stopped working in Firefox. How many Firefox users would tolerate that?

            • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 years ago

              Sure, because the average user won’t think his Firefox to be broken and just switch to chrome altogether. Chrome has no issue with that site after all. Once enough pages have it even most technically inclined people will probably not want to constantly juggle between browsers, just to use their banking site or whatever.

            • scutiger@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              20
              ·
              3 years ago

              Ok, but you can see how perhaps other people might care, right? Like you’re not a complete psychopath, right?

            • Rouxibeau@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              3 years ago

              I don’t care about x thing, it doesn’t affect me

              Then next year

              Why are they killing “y thing that affects me”

              Attitudes like that are a big factor in our current culture war.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 years ago

          Your recommendation isn’t wrong, but it’s a mistake to think problems like this can be solved with a mere boycott. This absolutely requires consumer protection legislation.

        • stravanasu@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 years ago

          Funny, note that that website uses DRM content. I have DRM disabled on Firefox and when I visit that site I get two DRM warnings.

      • Maiznieks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 years ago

        I already use ff and if there’s a site that requires drm to work, i don’t care for that site. They need visitors not the other way around.

    • Azula@feddit.rocksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      I don’t understand why others like Brave, Opera, Vivaldi…etc are silent on this big of a threat.