Hello new Lemmy friends!

Word on the street tells us our community is regularly making it the all page. While this is very cool news to hear, we can see how the sudden emergence of our posts in your feed might feel jarring and probably raises some questions. And also how, without knowing the backstory, our community might appear less than virtuous, so here’s a very brief introduction which hopefully will clear a few things up.

The woman we’re discussing is a body positive influencer and media personality who has gained fame and wealth by lying, manipulating, exploiting her children for content, plagiarizing BIPOC creators and blaming her BIPOC content editor for it (thereby ruining her career), among other things. Her fraudulent behavior is no different (I’d argue worse) from the likes of Jay Shetty (google him if you don’t know who he is or what he did). She’s the latest in a long line of grifting influencers who are abusing their power, taking advantage of their position and exploiting their followers. The difference is that she’s Canadian. Our laws around social media and advertising aren’t as clear (and where they are she’s disobeyed them), add to that, our mainstream media has protected her from those who’ve tried to expose her grift and silenced/intimidated anyone who’s tried to speak out.

Our Reddit sub was taken down due to reports of copyright infringement, which is unfounded and categorically untrue as no one ever tried to steal her work and pass it off as their own. The mods have made an appeal. While at first glance it may seem like we’re just “shitting on her” the sub has been more devoted to investigation and posting proof of her lies than just bitching for the sake of bitching. The reality is that she’s hurt, manipulated and let down a lot of people. She stole intellectual property and employment, caused mental distress and has repeatedly told lies to boost engagement and profit off her audience, so people are understandably upset that their voices are being silenced.

We’re grateful to have been welcomed so kindly by so many of you, and to those sticking around to watch the drama unfold, we’re glad to have you!

  • MoonChild@lemmy.caM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 years ago

    She has a lot of gall to claim copyright infringement to take down the subreddit when her blog was a textbook example of copyright infringement. Reddit was fair use and if you need a lawyer I know quite a few who specialize in copyright

      • MoonChild@lemmy.caM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m sorry to comment on this one again but my brain keeps going back to it. Was this during the Knix trip? It sounds a lot like Alicia. She and Bri had that sunrise chat and they are both rabid for their Princess and would do anything to protect her. Sarah is very good at having her flying monkeys do the dirty work and she pretends she’s above it. The mask slipped a little last week with her story about the person saying they we’re unfollowing because she was droning on about SI.

      • MoonChild@lemmy.caM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 years ago

        If you look up the word hypocrite in the dictionary her picture is right there beside the definition so maybe she doesn’t see how ridiculous she’s being

      • MoonChild@lemmy.caM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s flimsy but a lot of these platforms will just take things down rather than fight. She can only claim copyright for the pics and videos she’s taken herself. Maybe buddy Briony claimed her copyright for the pics she had taken - was this soon after the podcast photoshoot?

        • ladybonerforjustice@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 years ago

          You’re probably right re: Briony. She’s clearly obsessed with Sarah as she scours comment sections so she can block people. Who even has the time?

          Still, the subreddit mods said they never even got a warning. It doesn’t sit well with me that Reddit allows misogyny, underage porn and outright violence but not this. Talk about inconsistent.

          • olivesandpoppies@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            2 years ago

            Briony who went in full designer clothes with friends during covid restrictions to a low price grocery store (as a joke) and was kicked out for making fun of the store and people while filming content? Sounds about white.

              • olivesandpoppies@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                2 years ago

                The Instagram post that featured the photo by B, is still active, and the caption has changed, and many influencers who commented on the original photo after it was called out for being insensitive, are no longer there. I found this out from a fellow friend, who also is calling out, influencers, because I had no idea about this. I will say though, because the photo is of B and by her, it would maybe be seen as copyright for you to post? But lesbest on IG has the pics still up (minus a few comments that used to be there including one from a former joefresh influencer ). And the pics don’t discus the anger that was brought up due to it (locals were upset). I remember seeing the snapshot on the old Snark on Reddit.

          • MoonChild@lemmy.caM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 years ago

            The whole thing smells funny - no warning is unusual and it happened after the rules were tightened up. I thought it was all very well run so they had to try for the copyright infringement. The question is why not just remove the pics deemed to be in violation? It’s really heavy-handed

            • ladybonerforjustice@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 years ago

              Exactly, it could very easily have been remedied. I really hope mods win their appeal as they/we didn’t do anything wrong or unusual.

        • Spicykitty@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          I know that there is also the fair use act, so using the photos for educational purposes and not claiming them as your own is supposed to be protected. But a lot of platforms just take the stuff down and give you a hard time proving it, from what I’ve seen.

          • bunniculamonroe@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yep, it’s bullshit. The onus is actually on the person who claims copyright to prove it, so if you appeal a copyright claim then the person who reported it has to show how it is copyrighted in a certain amount of time or it will get reinstated. From my experience though, the pulling it immediately already does the damage and people don’t want to bother fighting it. I don’t know if counterclaims would help the sub get reinstated though.

            • ladybonerforjustice@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 years ago

              Wonder if Reddit has similar rules because they’d be in violation themselves for removing the sub based on bs copyright claims.

  • johan@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 years ago

    Hello and a warm welcome from this random lemmy user! Good luck with everything, hope you stick around

    • Joiyfulgrrrrl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      While someone is messaging Jannette can they let her know the plagiarized was used in blogs before the cloud tailor?

      I know she’s an investigative journalist working so hard for us. Surely she’s aware but she keeps saying it was stolen from someone but someone else had already shared it ! She would have asked the person she said it’s stolen from , right ? I was googling because I couldn’t find the plagiarism stuff with the subreddit gone and it came right up.

      It can’t be private label content, Janette would know for sure how often that it used. Especially in fashion and lifestyle content. It has all the tell tale signs of being that but Janette would know she’s the real deal.

      Please tell me this isn’t going to fall apart for us once Janette starts digging deeper!

        • Anniegobel@lemmy.caBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Janette. This copy was used on a blog called Boss Babe Chronicles in 2020. Link—> https://www.bossbabechroniclesblog.com/10-easy-ways-to-elevate-your-style/

          So cloud tailor stole it as well. The narrative you have created that Birdie stole from a WOC entrepreneur is false! You’ve claimed many times that you’re a reporter. You are not the only one that keeps receipts. But ok, you want to claim you are just now trying a “new hat” of reporting? So tip 1 if you’re just starting out in journalism—Dig a bit deeper!

          Some of us are making fun of you! You see it comes with the territory of being a public figure with 185000 followers! People have opinions on you girl! And we get to express them too!

            • ladybonerforjustice@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              You’re amazing, Janette!

              This question is not necessarily for you but anyone reading. Was the infamous Michael Jackson picture for the same Dyson partnership? I’m sure Dyson would like to know that someone they paid to represent them both plagiarized and filtered her image into something unrecognizable. How are people supposed to take that seriously and find her remotely credible?

            • Tinaceraldi@lemmy.caBanned from community
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              My cat is great thanks for asking Jan!

              How would you know if I’m in a tizzy or panicked though? That’s a manipulation tactic Jan! Acting as if I’m unstable and “crazy”. Back to the old misogynist handbook! Don’t stray from your roots right Jan!

              Well since you can’t see it’s copied word for word, I’ll prepare some examples for you! Maybe your expert will be able to see it!

              Lmao I don’t know Sarah. AJ, I haven’t hitched my wagon to anyone! This is about Jan! I know it’s more comforting for you to imagine that the only people who dislike you and see through your manipulation are Birdie and her flock. Too bad as a public figure you’ve opened yourself up to criticism! Deflect and dismiss the criticism Jan Jan but it’s not a good look!

                • ladybonerforjustice@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  They stalk us across all social media platforms and have said things that make us think it’s one or two individuals in particular. It’s pretty amusing especially as the person in question is not actually friends with the person/s defending them (they just think they are). It’s kind of sad.

                • Tinaceraldi@lemmy.caBanned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  So don’t ban people. I thought this group and platform was about free speech?

              • ladybonerforjustice@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                2 years ago

                Why don’t you just use her name? She goes by Janette on her socials and professionally. You seem incredibly immature and petty by that alone.

          • MoonChild@lemmy.caM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            You’re just full of straw man arguments that aren’t going to hold up. I suggest educating yourself before posting since you end up looking foolish.

      • Spicykitty@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 years ago

        I will tell her to check out this post. She knows this community exists but isn’t snarking here with us.

          • Spicykitty@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 years ago

            Glad to see you here and of course don’t mind! Definitely more efficient way to handle it.

          • Anniegobel@lemmy.caBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Oh! Since you’re here Jan Jan, can you tell us when you’ll be posting about the genocide in Palestine?

              • MoonChild@lemmy.caM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                14
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                You don’t need to answer to that poster. Some people hitch their star to the wrong wagon and don’t know when to let go. Perhaps they would like to tell us why there’s been a bot buying soree going on the last few days. It’s not a good look to boast about having more than 2.3 M followers when so many are ‘bot and paid for’ I’ve noticed they’re going top tier now and getting the ones that engage.

                • Tinaceraldi@lemmy.caBanned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  You should ask Jan about bot and bought followers. She doesn’t seem popular or interesting enough for 185000 followers. Ask her about Tina and Anne Marie. And all the other fake accounts following her. Then maybe you 2 can film people at the mall together! It’s totally legal and not creepy and gross at all!

              • Tinaceraldi@lemmy.caBanned from community
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                That’s nice. You still didn’t answer the question! Will you openly condemn the genocide in Palestine and post helpful links on your insta?

                It’s a manipulation tactic to answer simple questions with a long-winded reply that evades the actual question Jan!

                No one wants to cancel you Jan. But some people don’t care for you. It’s ok, we’re still allowed to voice our dislike in Canada! Freedom of speech and all that jazz

            • MoonChild@lemmy.caM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 years ago

              Jan Jan? Did you just leave the playground? I think it’s time you gave up and let the grown ups handle things

              • Tinaceraldi@lemmy.caBanned from community
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Lmao the grownups can’t even do a simple google search to find out if their plagiarism theories are correct! Yes Jan it did come up in a Google search! That’s how I found it girl! I’m not investigative reporter

          • Tinaceraldi@lemmy.caBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I know you said you won’t be back Jan, but I have so many questions! Why did you or your friends “Tina” and “Anne Marie” write a fake threat to you on Reddit? Why did the mods there cover it up? Are all the “threats” against you made up for attention?

  • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sounds good though I could have sworn I already saw some papaya instance awhile back. Maybe it’s just my long-covid addled brain fucking with me.

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Thanks for this! Honestly I just came across a video today and was so confused. I had no idea what I stumbled into lol