• coyotino [he/him]@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can someone explain this a bit better? I’m not exactly getting what these are. So they are nanogenerators, which coulkd be used as a component of all electricity-generating technologies? The article specifically talks about them converting kinetic energy into electrical, but i’m confused by the solar cell comparison. Wouldn’t these be implemented into new solar panels to increase their efficiency? It seems like these still need a “fuel”, like all energy-generation methods?

    • Powderhorn@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s an apples-to-oranges comparison. The idea here is replacing solar usage with kinetic energy in certain applications so fewer devices need an external power source and therefore wiring. It would also reduce grid use (by a minuscule amount), but I’m assuming the solar comparison is solely because both produce a DC current.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      It could potentially go on a device that could have been solar powered. That’s the only connection. This is only the beginning of how this article is clickbaity crap.

    • Fermion@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It would be nice for car keys and other remotes to never run out of battery. This seems like a good convenience technology, assuming it can be brought to market at comparable prices to li ion cells.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Big, big if. It says nothing about the actual manufacturing process. Also, the kind of movements smart watches make are large enough I’m guessing a balance of some kind already can capture a lot of it, if you don’t mind the feeling of having weights on your wrist.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No and no. Electrical generators/motors are already nearly perfect. The difference here it that these ones are really tiny. Oh, and it says nothing about if they can build them any way except manually one at a time.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, self-replicating machines could be cool. Not necessarily dangerous, too, depending on exactly how robust and good at using a variety of materials they are. If we just make a slightly different version of delicate seafloor bacteria that’s not very scary.

          That being said, you could 3D print most of a normal electric motor. I’d have to actually read the research to know how this triboelectric design compares.