• steventhedev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 years ago

    The actual auction site: https://360assetadvisors.com/events/fssmh/

    Looks like they’re only breaking it down into three parts: Infowars the media company, Infowars the supplement store, and a pile of domain names. Production equipment might get sold as part of a separate auction.

    I’m not loving the NDA though - open auctions should get more value.

  • Sir Arthur V Quackington@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 years ago

    Some jackass like Musk is gonna buy it at auction for the minimum they can get away with, and turn it into XInfoWars or something, and rehire Alex Jones because “truth is free” or some shit.

    There is 0 value in this as a media company, but it’s always been a conspiracy theorist grift. It being resold that’s really all it could be. Sadly, many in MAGA hats would love to keep the grift going.

    • Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      IIRC homes are protected in bankruptcy, because someone decided it would be unfair to inflict homelessness on someone for committing the crime of being broke (irony very intended).

  • PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 years ago

    If Elon Musk was a good person, he would buy the site and turn it into a memorial page for the victims at Sandy Hook.

    But he is not a good person.

  • john89@lemmy.caBannedBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think that money could be used for better things by people who actually need it.

    Edit: Or it can be used to buy these people new SUVs, yeah.

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 years ago

      Fuck off.

      You have no idea what these families have been through to even make an attempt to decide whether they deserve it.

  • hate2bme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    So I am ignorant of how he couldn’t just envoke his first amendment rights on this case. I believe he is an asshole but I don’t understand how he can be sued for talking in America. Downvoted for asking a question? I thought I was on Reddit for a second.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 years ago

      The case was about the slander and libel, and inciting harassment. People were calling the families and telling them that were going to piss on their graves, dig up the bodies, etc. Alex Jones basically called the dad of one of the victims retarded on air.

      Alex Jones featured several guests who were involved in actively harassing the family, eg Wolfgang Howiztzer.

      Beyond that, he could have tried to use a first amendment defense, if he had complied with discovery. He lost the case on default, because he was withholding information and not complying with discovery. There were many, many issues where InfoWars representatives were not providing the information that they were legally required to provide. They were given many, many opportunities to correct this, and refused to do so.

        • andros_rex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          I think the downvotes were assuming you “sealioning.” Alex Jones did a lot of bad faith yelling during the trial to try to falsely present it as a freedom of speech issue, so it does come across as you promoting his talking point. He really is an “info warrior” - his weapon is spewing so much shit that some of his talking points will stick.

          • hate2bme@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            No, I just believe in our rights. I can’t stand the dude and even said so in my first comment. I honestly have only heard a couple things the guys has said and that was more than enough. Thanks again for answering and explaining.

    • SparrowRanjitScaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      You’re protected from government persecution for the things you say by the first amendment. It doesn’t protect you from being sued for harassment or slander by other citizens.