reuters.com
www.reuters.com
    • merc@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      2·
      2 years ago

      It’s not my reading comprehension that’s at issue here, it’s your abilities with basic logic.

            • merc@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
              2·
              2 years ago

              I avoided logic? Aren’t you the person who claimed “if you didn’t vote then you voted”?

                • merc@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
                  2·
                  2 years ago

                  Your previous comments don’t address your ridiculous assertion that “if you didn’t vote then you voted”.

                  Why don’t you just admit that that was very stupid phrasing and back down? You were wrong. You were emotional. You exaggerated. Why do you insist on doubling down on saying something so stupid?