• PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    You misspelled “put their heads in a basket”

    It’s too late for them to apologize with paying their fair share.

    Unless that share is sanguine in nature.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The issue I have with this sentiment is that some percentage of the rich made active pursuits to deny our freedoms and destroy democracy; while others were…just quiet and uninvolved in politics.

      What’s more, much as it makes sense to change our hyper-capitalistic society, this is the society we’re working within in order to make change. Even printing a poster that explains why capitalism is bad costs money. By that token, we will likely need some support from some wealthy people to make change. And yes, that support exists to some degree, and no, we don’t literally need to have “more money” than the opposition.

      So maybe you were just shortening sentiments for the sake of a snarky post, which is fine. We can pursue better tax rates for wealthier people, while also pursuing criminal investigations and metaphorical guillotines for the Heritage Foundation. Literally seize all their money. If I’m to make one point though, you don’t want those quiet wealthy people to feel that the Heritage Foundation are their only friends.

      I know, man. There’s lots of people I dream about taking a crowbar to. But when I’m done with the violent rhetoric in my head, I think of the most practical actions.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would say that fixing the taxes that the rich are (not) paying, would be more… Prevention for the future.

      Heads in baskets is more, paying for the sins of the past.