• WhiteBurrito@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        Exactly.

        This is why I’m happy I work for a Family owned company. They know some years revenue just won’t be bigger and that’s ok. I’ve only seen like one wave of “layoffs” and even then most of the people that left just took an early retirement deal coz they were going to retire that year anyways, so that basically fixed the re organization that needed to happen

      • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Profit isn’t required to maintain a company. Only enough revenue to cover costs. Everything else is a surplus.

        • Nougat@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          10 months ago

          Profit would be appropriate if it were earmarked to offset difficult future fiscal periods, so that the business could continue to operate in lean times without having to punish employees through layoffs or failure to keep up with cost of living or cutting back on other benefits.

          But we all know that’s not what happens. Owners never have to experience consequences; customers and employees always do, for things that they have no control over.

          • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            Absolutely, but I would even go as far as to say that things like rainy day funds or reinvestment should be considered costs of business not “things we might do with profit”.

            • Nougat@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              10 months ago

              Oh yeah, yeah - from a financial/reporting perspective, such a fund wouldn’t be considered “profit” in the strictest capitalist sense.

              If you consider that kind of fund to be for the benefit of customers and employees, it might be considered “socialist profit.” Capitalist profit serves the ownership class. Socialist profit serves labor and consumers.

  • thedruid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    10 months ago

    Layoffs.

    Otherwise known as “fuck you for working your ass off to make us rich, we’re taking your health care, benefits and retirement. Your rent is now in jeopardy and we recommend potatoes at , or in place of, every meal”.

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    10 months ago

    That July 2024 outage must have hit their forecast pretty hard. Best wishes to those affected :(

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Guess getting p0vvN3d cut their legs out after all. Who’s going to buy them, y’think?

  • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    This headline… Could mean we’re laying off 1 million people and the 500 people left better keep up.