The Titanic director, who is planning an adaptation of nonfiction book Ghosts of Hiroshima, says Nolan’s film ‘dodged the subject’ of the atomic bomb’s devastating impact on that city
I don’t understand the west and the comments here. I’m pretty sure a movie would be called anti semetic if it was a Hitler’s Biopic that only focuses on him and not the victims. Somehow killing millions of civilians can be glossed over as long as they are not jews.
Did you watch the movie? He literally had moral qualms about what he ended up doing. There’s a scene where he’s accepting an award or something and all he can see and hear is the screams of the dying civilians his bombs killed. He got called a pussy by Truman because he felt that guilt. It didn’t go into extreme detail, but it 100% covered it… from the perspective of the person the movie was about.
I don’t understand the west and the comments here. I’m pretty sure a movie would be called anti semetic if it was a Hitler’s Biopic that only focuses on him and not the victims. Somehow killing millions of civilians can be glossed over as long as they are not jews.
Did you watch the movie? He literally had moral qualms about what he ended up doing. There’s a scene where he’s accepting an award or something and all he can see and hear is the screams of the dying civilians his bombs killed. He got called a pussy by Truman because he felt that guilt. It didn’t go into extreme detail, but it 100% covered it… from the perspective of the person the movie was about.
Ok? I never said otherwise. I’m talking about the comments saying not everything is about every single thing.
So you’re pissed that it didn’t cover every thing, but you don’t understand why other people don’t think the same way you do, got it.
Not really. I’m just pointing out hypocrisy and double standards held for the US. What exactly are you adding to the conversation?