• lol3droflxp@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 years ago

      Because they co-developed it and it is the better connector if you want to do anything other than charging.

        • mriguy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 years ago

          Because when they switched from the 30 pin connector to lightning, everybody bitched and moaned about it. So they promised they’d keep lightning for a decade. It’s been 11 years.

          But I’m sure if they’d broken their promise and switched earlier, everyone would have been understanding.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      Phones go in pockets. Pockets have lint. Lightning ports are way easier to clean than USB-C.

      iPads and Macbooks mostly stay in the house or get carried in a bag rather than a pocket. Way less lint, so the benefits of USB-C far outweigh the benefits of Lightning here.

      • suction@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        How much more lint do you think will an USB-C port catch than a lightning port? Answer: Insignificantly little. You’r reaching for arguments here.

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 years ago

          I said easier to clean not that it catches less lint. I could even use a toothpick for my iPhone. Nothing thicker than a sim tool worked for my Oneplus and that had trouble getting it all out. Even most NEEDLES I had were too thick.