Blåhaj Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Flying Squid@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 years ago

X (Twitter) Failed to Act on 86% of Hate Speech Posts, Researchers Say

gizmodo.com

external-link
message-square
41
link
fedilink
574
external-link

X (Twitter) Failed to Act on 86% of Hate Speech Posts, Researchers Say

gizmodo.com

Flying Squid@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 years ago
message-square
41
link
fedilink
The reported posts included content that denied the Holocaust and promoted white supremacy. In response, Musk called the researchers a "bronze tier psy ops."
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    2 years ago

    Wait, I’m shocked Xitter had numbers as high as 14% when it comes to dealing with hate speech…

    • FailBait@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 years ago

      Once reported an obvious anti-Semitic post that I found (was curious if they actually would). Took them a week or two but they actually took it down. I was shocked.

      • EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        2 years ago

        One engagement dies down around a post they can take it down and just pretend they’re oh so backlogged to save face.

        Everyone saw it already, the damage was done.

        • TechyDad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 years ago

          Of course, they might actually be backlogged because Musk fired almost everyone who dealt with that stuff. When you hamstring a department, they can quickly fall behind on their work.

  • snipgan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    2 years ago

    Twitter, as far as I have recalled, has almost always been a cesspool for hot takes and hate. Just with Elon in charge the flood gates have really opened and has acquired a particular flavor mimicking his own tastes.

    The real question now is if this will ultimately lead to the ban or slow death of Twitter. People really can only put up with so much vitriol.

    Many countries are lining up with laws and bill coming after social media, usually under the goal or “goal” of protecting kids, so we will see how things turn out. Might even be a quicker death/change then.

    • Lord_McAlister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      Actually they’ll use anything they can to get that same fix twitter delivered before. The quality doesn’t matter if it’s their only outlet. Until a new app arrives to replace it, nothing will kill it. It’s like Davy Jones’ heart.

      • Sanity_in_Moderation@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        There are alternatives on the horizon. But they always seem to be on the horizon. Bluesky?

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.worldBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yeah, Jack Dorsey should not get a second chance. Twitter was already shit before Elon made it worse.

        • Lord_McAlister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          No idea, I really don’t use Twitter.

        • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          deleted by creator

          • Sanity_in_Moderation@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            I put in for an invite months ago. They were at 50k users. I just checked and they’re at 1 million. Seems to be growing fast.

    • Rubanski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

  • zcd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    Working as intended apparently, what a dumpster fire

  • xc2215x@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Removed by mod

  • Maya_Weiss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    Hey, they did managed to react on my hate speech posts… against v.putin. Rather quickly too. So yeah, if you are a dictator, its all Gucci.

  • Cheers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    “We don’t want to be the ones policing forums.”

    At the same time

    Elon aids the enemy in the Ukraine and Russia conflict.

  • UnD3Rgr0uNDCL0wN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    deleted by creator

  • IHaveTwoCows@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    deleted by creator

  • spacecadet@lemm.eeBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Removed by mod

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      66
      ·
      2 years ago

      What is “left wing hate speech?”

      • Wet Noodle@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        2 years ago

        “Fascists should k*ll themselves” got me banned from xitter so that’s the kinda ‘hate speech’ they care about

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          42
          ·
          2 years ago

          Ah, the old paradox of tolerance.

          It’s not hate speech to say anything bad about fascists.

          • agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 years ago

            in DnD it would probably be neutral good at the spiciest, possibly even lawful good.

      • Delusional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        2 years ago

        Those billionaires have too much money and people should be able to afford a one bedroom apartment on a full time minimum wage job!

        /Hatespeech

      • spacecadet@lemm.eeBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Removed by mod

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          53
          ·
          2 years ago

          Who is calling for such things?

          And as for banning books, are you sure it’s the left that’s doing that? Because I can share some links with you…

          • meco03211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 years ago

            https://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2014/03/a-twitter-hashtag-probably-doesnt-prove-feminists-want-to-kill-all-men/359493/

            Almost every extreme view will likely have someone pushing those ideals through xitter at some point. Whether or not those posts gain any sort of traction or represent a greater movement could still be up for debate.

            Quick note: this isn’t meant to support or oppose any side or position. Just putting information out there addressing the question that was posed.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              25
              ·
              2 years ago

              I can’t read past the paywall, but it looks like that hashtag was meant to be sarcastic. Denying the Holocaust, praising Hitler, saying racist things… those are not done with sarcasm.

              • meco03211@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 years ago

                Would you accept other hate speech provided it’s qualified as “sarcastic”? How should xitter determine sarcastic messages vs serious ones?

                And saying the entirety of that hashtag was used sarcastically is incredibly presumptuous. How would someone prove to you that it was used at least once seriously?

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  17
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  I would say that entirely depends on how it’s worded. This was a parody of another hashtag that was being used sarcastically. I would not call that hate speech in any way. I’m sorry, but “killallmen” is clearly not meant the way the hate speech being allowed on Twitter is meant now. There’s a world of difference. It’s not even comparable.

        • Telorand@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          33
          ·
          2 years ago

          Wow, a whole list of “things that never happened.”

          Please, get help to escape the conspiracy feedback loop you’re obviously in.

        • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          2 years ago

          Dude, your mind has been totally fucked, come back to reality please.

          • don@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            2 years ago

            come back to reality please.

            I admire your optimism.

        • muse@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          2 years ago

          Would you like to show us on doll where your imaginary evil strawman touched you?

          • pivot_root@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 years ago

            Nowhere. I was nowhere near it, and it made false allegations that I sexually assaulted it. Now my life is ruined over lies and cancel culture. —that guy, probably

        • TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yea nooo. No one ever said that.

          On another note, you must really love being a living puppet.

          • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 years ago

            No one ever said that.

            The hell they didn’t! I’m not the person who made the claim nor am I a Conservative but you don’t get to make up your own reality.

            Calling for the genocide of whites.

            It’s STILL THERE NOW - https://twitter.com/hashtag/antiwhite?src=hashtag_click

            men

            certain political ideologies

            I mean this is as blatant as it can possibly be.

            praising the appropriation of Western European culture to “subvert” it and rewrite it

            banning books

            See that book on the table in front of Gov Newsom? It’s banned in California.

            It isn’t just the old literary classics either.

            https://www.vulture.com/2017/08/the-toxic-drama-of-ya-twitter.html

            https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/how-a-twitter-mob-destroyed-a-young-immigrant-female-authors-budding-career

            So what reality are you living in that this stuff doesn’t exist? It’s been blatantly all over Twitter and Tumblr for at least a decade.

            It doesn’t mean that Elon is great (he isn’t) or that Republicans are good (they aren’t) but denying reality isn’t good either.

            • TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              You’re tripping over edgelords on twitter?! Lmfao. I think that might be stupider than your favorite news outlet.

              Are you angry about the right banning books or are you only angry at unverified trolls on twitter and other non issues?

              Unhinged af. Dance puppet, dance.

              • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 years ago

                How about you knock off the ad hominems and admit that there are extremists on the left, although they do not represent the majority of their political group like right wing extremists now do. You’re moving the goalposts so hard right now, and I say this as someone pretty far left myself. We don’t need to deny reality to prove that we’re right.

            • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              I’m with you on this, we can have a couple of crazies on the left and still be correct. No need to deny that they exist.

        • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          deleted by creator

    • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      deleted by creator

  • danikpapas@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    That’s good isn’t it? That only means that Elon decensored that platform

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      2 years ago

      Do explain how more Nazis is a good thing.

      • flipht@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        2 years ago

        Check their post history. Next most recent comment is calling Lyft sexist for letting women select the gender of their driver, and the one after that is saying that there should be no limits on landlord’s ability to evict.

        This is not someone operating in good faith.

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          I think their opinions are just bad

    • maeries@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 years ago

      Except when elon doesn’t like what you write. Then the free speech isn’t that free any more

    • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      deleted by creator

  • Octavio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    deleted by creator

  • blady_blah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    According to Elon musk, it’s a feature, not a bug.

politics @lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@lemmy.world

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.14K users / day
  • 6.04K users / week
  • 9.29K users / month
  • 18.9K users / 6 months
  • 276 local subscribers
  • 27.2K subscribers
  • 27.4K Posts
  • 587K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
  • aidan@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
  • JuBe@lemmy.world
  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
  • UI: 0.19.13
  • BE: 0.19.13-modified
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org