• qupada@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    8 months ago

    “Surveillance-minded” (hereafter, “Helicopter”) parents were almost certainly already doing that.

    It just required a sharp knife and a tube of contact adhesive previously.

    • Ugurcan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      I was under the impression this is the main selling point of AirTags. Is there a real market for tracking lost luggage? I see AirTags being sold in every Kid’s store around here.

      • Shelbyeileen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        My dog has one on her collar. She got lost once, after chasing a squirrel, so it was a no brainer. The cool thing is that you can make it go off, by pressing a button, and train the dog to come to you when it chirps. I hope I never need to use it in an emergency, but it’s good to know I’m prepared.

      • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        I have one in a very well hidden pocket in my backpack. Because it’s my gig bag, and goes with me when I’m working in the field. If I were just leaving it under my desk all day, I wouldn’t bother. But since it often ends up sitting in the corner of a random room while I run around a building, it has an AirTag buried in it.

  • BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m not concerned with tracking where my kids are with these, but tracking their shoes sounds kinda useful. Average daily conversation in my house:

    "Where are you shoes?"
    "I don't know?"
    "You were just in the middle of putting them on!?!!"
    "Yeah but... I can't find them now."
    "How? You had them in your hands?!?"
    "That was, um, before I got distracted."
    "*sigh* Let's go try and find them."
    
    • Fiery@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      8 months ago

      Young children should absolutely not have a phone, unless I suppose it’s completely locked down to chat apps and the tracking I suppose…

      • KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        8 months ago

        My little sister has a phone I set up for her. It has no internet browser, requires permission to download apps, no voicemail, blocks unknown callers, and turns off at 9pm with the exception of contacting family or emergency services.

        Phones can be safe for kids if parent just put in the time to learn about parental safety systems and implement them.

      • sykaster@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        More and more governments issue warning about the effects of screens on baby, toddler, and child brain development. The age the Netherlands puts forward now is 14 to have a smartphone, and no screens or very limited until 3 years of age.

          • _ffiresticks_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            8 months ago

            They issue is less the screen than it is the lack of long-form entertainment. Kids paying attention to an hour and a half movie plot on the screen isn’t the same problem as scrolling through endless 30 second videos or accessing social media.

          • sykaster@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            The TV is also bad, but smartphones are literally slot machines in the child’s pocket that keep giving them dopamine hits. It’s many times worse for the brain.

            There are parental controls etc. But the nature of the device is addictive with its notifications and the likes.

      • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Learn to use the tools to protect your kids. iPhones and Android can absolutely be locked down for children. Or just get an apple watch or flip phone. All better than a fucking airtag.

        My kids got an apple watch, locked down during school hours, etc.

        • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Better for what purpose? If you’re on holiday in a busy, foreign city, an AirTag for location tracking is much cheaper than this other options.

          • MattTheProgrammer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            AirTags rely on being able to piggyback off of other iPhones to report their location. They are not a self-contained device, merely an appliance. If you give your kid a smartwatch with cellular or a full-fledged phone, you can track where they are but also they have the ability to contact you/be contacted if need be. Sure, there are drawbacks to such choices, but that is what being well-informed as a parent is all about.

      • Bubs@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m pretty sure you can’t track them through the network. You can’t say “track this air tag wherever it goes”.

        But you could use a device to track the signal the air tag emits as long as you’re in range.

          • Bubs@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I don’t know myself, but it probably wouldn’t be too difficult to track the change. Just look at when tracker abc disappears and when tracker xyz takes its place. Unless you’re in an area with lots of trackers, it wouldn’t be too difficult to weed out the target tracker.

            • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              you’re almost always in an area with lots of trackers: every iphone, apple watch, lots of airpods, and macbooks all have UWB-based tracking in them these days

      • AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        If not, then cool, your parents can give that info to your creepy uncle Steve. He’s just gonna pick you up from school one day. Better hope he doesn’t bring his white van.

  • bcgm3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    8 months ago

    Kids have a distinct advantage in this ongoing consumer tech war between parents and kids.

    I don’t use TikTok, but I’d be pretty surprised if this wasn’t already starting to trend there, along with ideas for where to put the airtags to fool parents.

    Maybe just… talk to your kids?

    • ZeffSyde@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Bonus points if they had the hard plastic instep so you could grind with them like Soaps.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 months ago

    If you need to spy on your kids to keep tabs on them, you’re a shitty parent. You should be able to discuss enabling Find My (assuming they have an iPhone) on their phone and why that’s required (by you) openly.

    Too many inept people have children. That’s a large part of why society is in such decline.

    • wavebeam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      Hey asshole, special needs kids are big and strong and smart enough to get themselves out in the world and need ways to get to them to keep them safe. There are plenty of reasonable reasons for tracking tech for your kid that aren’t helicopter parenting.

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        You don’t need to be a helicopter parent to explain to your kids that you want to be able to find them if needed. And you don’t need to monitor them just because that feature is enabled. A reasonable parent can require the feature be enabled and only use it when there’s cause.

        I maintain that if you need to hide your tracker from your child, you suck as a parent. And if your kid has special needs that make this untenable, that’s obviously different from what I originally said broadly about most parents.

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yes, now more than ever. But inept people had children who they raised to be thoughtless party-followers rather than free-thinkers and that’s why Roe v Wade was overturned.

    • pachrist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I am sure most people are considering doing this have elementary aged children. A $20 tag feels like a better option than a $1000 phone. I’d prefer putting it on a backpack than in a shoe though.

      All parents spy on their children. That doesn’t make you a shitty parent. What you do with that info and how you handle it does.

  • Guidy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 months ago

    Parents worry about their kids. All mammals I’ve ever heard of do this. So when you tell human parents that they can have a better chance of finding their kids if their kids are missing, injured, or abducted, that’s going to appeal.

    I don’t believe it’s about sUrVeIlLaNcE at all.

    • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      Maybe good in a country that has barily any walking or cycling infrastructure, where every idiot has a gun and where all the biggest serial killers originate from. And where recently your kid can be kidnapped by unmarked unrecognizable fake police and sent to a concentration camp in El Salvador without any legal process.

      But when you live in a first world country, your 8 year old should be able to go to school by bike on his own without issues what so ever, would never be kidnapped and would be brought home by a concerned neighbor when he falls and get injured. And would never get lost. You don’t need an air tag for that. I’ve even seen kids go to school on their own in Cambodia without issues. They have over 40 different deadly snakes including 6 types of cobras.

      When you treat a kid as an irresponsible criminal and/or idiot, that’s what they will become.

    • volvoxvsmarla@sopuli.xyzBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      The problem in this thread seems to be that children are seen as one homogenous group of people between ages 0 to 17. And you can either send you 5 year old to NYC without any technology by themselves, or check your 17 year old’s location 24/7. Forget about any kind of in between.

      Like, of course I am “surveilling” my 3 year old, I am literally obligated to. I do this with my own eyes or leave them in the care of a capable person, although depending on the situation (relative, babysitter, daycare) it is still me who is liable when something happens.

      I am happy to leave my 8 year old rumble around freely as long as they return home by a time that we agreed on. We can very well also agree on them calling if they won’t make it home by the agreed time, and if they don’t call or pick up their phone within an additional 30 minutes, I will check their location. This can be a known and agreed upon checking. And it is about mutual trust. I trust my kid at a certain age to be responsible and keep track of time, and be available by phone (unless otherwise agreed or if they don’t have a phone to begin with), as well as be where we agreed they would be, without checking. And I hope my kid will also trust me to keep up my side of the agreement. I won’t check unless it’s past return time and you are not picking up your phone.

      This mutual trust is important in families. You deserve privacy, even if you are a kindergartener. This privacy will expand with age. This is like hiding your locked diary or leaving an open diary on your desk. You should not feel the need to hide it because I for sure won’t look at it. It is yours. Similarly, you can roam around freely even with an airtag. This thing is not for daily use.

      Now, does my 17 year old need an airtag? To me they are basically an adult. Hell knows I had all the freedom in the world at that age. If they feel safer knowing I could check on them when they are on a night out, maybe we can keep a similar agreement as above. But otherwise it doesn’t seem to make a lot of sense to me.

  • rozodru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    showing my age but when I was a kid during the summer or on weekends I’d be out of the house all day and just where ever in my town. My parents didn’t care as long as I was either home for dinner or by the time the street lights came on. and if I wasn’t home for dinner I had to find a phone and call not because my parents would be worried but so they either wouldn’t have to cook as much or set out a plate for me.

  • oplkill@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 months ago

    For mine kid(if I would have them) I would tell them to have those tracks, but only with a deal to not use it against kid. Like kid skipped a school and I will can’t use that track info as a proof to punish kid. So, only use it as a real safety of kid, not as spying it

  • Constant Pain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    “surveillance-minded parents”… Are they trying to put a negative spin on it?

    Knowing where your underage kid is is a must these days. Lots of crazy people out there.

    • possumparty
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      8 months ago

      uh, statistically there are less crazy mfs than there were 30 years ago. we just weren’t hyper connected. so yes, I would hope they’re putting a negative spin on it. Fuck sake, my sister wouldn’t let her 16 year old boys walk to the end of the cul-de-sac for fear of them being kidnapped. This shit is so god-damned stupid.

      • Constant Pain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        Just because your sister is hyper vigilant, doesn’t mean having the capacity to track your children is wrong. People have different lives and live in different places. Just because this tool has no value to you doesn’t mean it is wrong.

      • OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        My kid is 8. I like to let him roam free in the neighborhood, but I also want to be sure I can keep track of him, or locate him if he disappears. I don’t see how this is a bad thing.

      • j5906@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        wtf at 16 I was doing vacation alone with my then girlfriend in another country were we travelled to by train lol

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think you’re one of those crazy people. Honestly, no one with that level of control obsession should be allowed to have children.

      • Constant Pain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        You’re thinking wrong.

        You guys are confusing safety with surveillance because of the obvious clickbaity title of the article.

        Having the option to know where your children are is not the same as controlling them. Parent intent matters and any tool can be abused, which doesn’t mean the tool is wrong.

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          8 months ago

          You’re teaching your children to accept highly invasive surveillance. And for what? Just so you can surrender to a moral panic about stranger danger, when actual rates of childhood abduction and abuse are at historic lows. You’re failing to properly raise citizens of a healthy democratic society. Instead, you’re raising children to accept living in an authoritarian society. If kids grow up with their own parents spying on them, why would they ever think the government and corporations spying on them is wrong? You surrendered the freedom of your own children, just to give in to your own irrational insecurities. But you tell yourself that your case is different, that you’re violating their privacy for their own good. This is exactly what every authoritarian government tells their citizens. It’s for your own good; that’s what they always say. You are failing to teach your children to have the values necessary to be citizens in a healthy democracy.

          The road to Hell is paved with “for the children.”

          • jfrnz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            They’re AirTags in shoes, dude. Kids aren’t learning to submit to authoritarians because of Sketchers, they’re just finding their shoes faster.

            • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              8 months ago

              And that’s what the proles told each other about telescreens.

              “It’s just a telescreen dood, just chill.”

          • moakley@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            when actual rates of childhood abduction and abuse are at historic lows.

            So you’re saying that parents are more cautious than ever, and childhood abduction rates are at an all time low, and you don’t think maybe those two things are related?

            Do you also think we should stop vaccinations when the diseases they protect against are at historic lows?

            Besides which, the overall rate of child abductions only matters if we’re talking about the measures that society should take.

            On a personal level, if my child got abducted and I didn’t do everything in my power to prevent that, I doubt I’d be comforted by the knowledge that it was extremely unlikely to have happened. I wouldn’t walk into my child’s empty bedroom and say to my grieving wife, “Man, what were the odds?”

            I don’t want to actively track their every move because I’m not a psycho, but there’s no downside to giving myself the ability to find them in an emergency.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      These days they have phones on them. Imagine raising a kid in the 90s or earlier.

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m saying my mom let me go outside and play with friends when there weren’t even phones you could just put in your pocket and be available. Whoever’s yard you were hanging out at, their parents said it was dinner time and that’s how you knew to go home too.

          Ya gotta have SOME level of trust for your kids, otherwise you’ll never have a healthy relationship with them.

    • moakley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      “It says his left shoe is supposed to be here, but all I see is his right shoe! How is this possible!?”