I didn’t even ask it to take her clothes off.
  • panda_abyss@lemmy.caEnglish
    57·
    6 months ago

    That’s satire though.

    Under any reasonable court (big caveat for American courts right now) that’s free speech.

      • 51dusty@lemmy.worldEnglish
        13·
        6 months ago

        how can an ai bot pull a free speech defense? free speech is, ostensibly, reserved for people…?

          • Echo Dot@feddit.ukEnglish
            3·
            6 months ago

            So? The manufacturer of the product is not responsible for how people use the product. Otherwise there would be no gun manufacturers anymore.

            • Ulrich@feddit.orgEnglish
              4·
              6 months ago

              They are, however, responsible if the product they created does illegal things.

        • Ulrich@feddit.orgEnglish
          6·
          6 months ago

          Based on what? Who have you seen be convicted of making deepfake porn? Under what law?

            • Ulrich@feddit.orgEnglish
              5·
              6 months ago

              No one said it was. What I said was that it doesn’t matter if it’s satire or not, it’s still classified as free speech, until a court proves otherwise.

          • SkyeStarfallEnglish
            3·
            6 months ago

            Uhm, there have been plenty of cases of people getting in trouble for sharing deepfake porn yes. It’s sexual harassment.

            Well, at least over here in Europe, and it’s mostly been with teenagers, I don’t know the situation on the US

            But generally, making and sharing porn of real people is… well… that can very easily count as sexual harassement