• salacious_coaster@infosec.pubBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    120
    ·
    4 months ago

    Might as well. It was originally called that, and the DoD name was always kind of a lame coat of off-white landlord paint.

      • salacious_coaster@infosec.pubBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I’ll bite. How is that?

        Edit: I watched the death of a euphemism video and understand your point now. My original comment was less of a serious assertion and more voicing my general disdain for the idea of crossing out “War,” writing “Defense,” and continuing to invade countries for decades anyway.

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    4 months ago

    Lmfao finally something I’m glad he’s doing!

    The name change was fucking psychological manipulation for the population. You can’t argue against defense department spending as easily as you can argue against war department spending.

    Bring it on! Make our jobs easier you bumbling brainrotted doughnut dictator.

  • MiDaBa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    4 months ago

    If we’re honest, this new name more accurately describes the American military than the word defense does

    • Frezik
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      4 months ago

      It actually used to be called “Department of War”. It changed in 1947, which was actually right around the time when the United States went full worldwide imperialism (though there were signs well before then).

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        4 months ago

        Might as well have been named the “Department of Fighting Communist Insurgencies”. Truman and Eisenhower unleashed wave after wave of US troops on any pre-ww colonial territory that was trying to throw off the yoke of European occupation.

        With Global Communism finally crushed, and ethno-nationalist tin pot plutocrats once again in control of Europe and the Middle East, the US can return to its more McKinley-esque tradition of occupation, enslavement, and extraction. No need to pretend we’re shielding anyone from the villainous Soviet Marxists or the vile and malignant IWW.

      • blackfox@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s always interesting to see how and why we’re living in bizarro world.

        Thumbs up to orange man for correcting this mistake.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      4 months ago

      A 10 year old boy who is also a felon, a rapist, and fucks 10 year old girls, while letting other 10 year old boys dictate policy while he golfs and rapes people.

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        He’s more like a ten year old boy who fucks three-year-old girls who don’t yet have the language to say what happened to them…and when they get snitchy, he threatens them with violence to shut them up, often demonstrating on a small animal.

        I think I’m trying to say he’s not just a precocious kid with anger issues, but a precocious kid with a cruelty streak and symptoms of physical neurological effects and poses a danger to himself and others.

          • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            As in precocious puberty. Kids who are sexually activated (by premature hormone reactions which can be triggered – not always – by sexual abuse) so they get sexually interested before their peers, and ruin recess for everyone else.

            When I was growing up (mind you, I was a late, late bloomer) precocious puberty in girls was punished brutally (say being grounded for life). Precocious puberty in boys was rewarded with early sports careers, unless you sucked, in which case you were punished for being a sex pest. This was a source of bullies that preyed on the rest of us.

            This is to say, the US really doesn’t know how to parent or teach or otherwise administrate children. This is also to say I am way, way bitter about it.

            ETA This is one of the purposes of puberty blockers, when it’s not used to let questioning trans kids decide to deliberate on what they want to be for a while, so I hope things are generally better. But then, considering how puberty blockers are now politicized, precocious puberty is also politicized, which ruins everyone’s Sunday brunch.

          • smeenz@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yeah I think trump is the polar opposite of precocious. He still acts like a spoilt child at 79

    • quick_snail@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      I mean historically the Nobel Peace Prize is given to war criminals, so he deserves it.

      I think you’re thinking of the Right Livelihood award. That’s for people who do actual Peace things.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    4 months ago

    Good.

    It should be. At any point in time the US is involved in 5-10 wars since Obama.

    Calling it the Dept. of War is honest.

    • stringere@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Pretty sure the Carter administration was the last one to have no new wars in over 100 years.

      Edit: I was wrong. The US was still involved in wars during his administration.

      It’s been super easy finding out the USA has only had 8-34 years of peace in it’s history, not so much what those years pg peace were combing lists on wikipedia with my phone.

      • PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Many issues at play:

        1. In the same way that a lot of people with powerful friends in the city depend on new highway projects, new community centers, new programs being set up, so that their friends can get paid, people in the US government with powerful friends depend on new wars so that everyone can sell weapons and continue to have good quarters.
        2. The US military benefits enormously from getting a ton of practice. We’re trying to run an empire, and very often big militaries get lazy because their countries do so well that they don’t really have to be scrappy, and people get complacent. War is so shocking and challenging that the only way to really stay good at it is to be doing it. And so, that’s exactly what the US does.
        3. The US has its fingers in so many pies so to speak that all kinds of shit that happens globally we determine to be our business. Civil war in Syria? Holy shit, better make sure the right people win. Let’s go fuck up some irregular forces that don’t have helicopters or satellite support.
        • stringere@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Oh yeah, the military-industrial complex has been an issue since Eisenhower’s warning was ignored on his way out. Then again, he could have done something more about it while in office. JFK had a speech about it and wanted to curtail it before getting assassinated.

            • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              4 months ago

              Also why Bobby never achieved the presidency, and he had the balls to tell the rich he was going to tax them to pay for a better social safety net.

              • PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                There’s a pretty good book called “Playing With Fire” about the politics of the late 60s and the events of the time. I had to stop reading it, it’s too sad. Bobby Kennedy talking to the crowd after MLK was shot, not knowing that he was going to be dead the same way a short time later, just fucked me up, I put it down.

          • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            It was an issue during his presidency, when he actively participated in (at the time) the largest expansion of our nuclear arsenal in history. Eisenhower. like all American presidents, was a hypocrite.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m so glad President Trump is focused on the important issues, like renaming bodies of water, mountains, schools, and federal institutions. I didn’t need lower grocery prices anyway.

  • seraphine
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    4 months ago

    WAR IS PEACE

    FREEDOM IS SLAVERY

    IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH