• snooggums@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    2 months ago

    The vast, vast majority of people are forgotten within 100 years. Pretty much need to be in an extremely high position where records are kept, like presidents, or do something extraordinarily positive or negative.

    I strongly doubt anyone reading this post will be remembered after the people they met or interacted with directly have died.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Yeah, weird random chance makes a huge difference. Otzi was probably well known, but only hyper-regionally. Lucy was basically just an unusually smart animal, and that was millions of years ago.

        And just because you’re forgotten for a bit doesn’t mean you won’t come back into style.

        Hmm. So if you want 15 minutes of fame a long time from now, what’s some weird easter egg you can leave?

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Archeologists actually dig up a lot of sex toys, believe it or not. That won’t get you noticed.

            A time capsule with something that nobody else will think to preserve might do it. Way too many preserve things the future is actually meh about. I wonder if a weird data footprint might be even better at this point. Like, if you filled out some official form thousands of times just for fun, and someone a long time from now is doing analysis and turns it into a meme.

    • I actually have a geneology book (族谱) from my paternal lineage (everybody does this in China). Its just a bunch of names, and some history of the village summarized. I hate tradition and I’m already in the US right now, I dont give a shit about the stupid geneology book anymore, my ancesters will probably be so pisses to find out that I totally ignored all the hard efforts lol. (My village still has a copy, but I’m not adding more name to the stupid thing, a waste of time, its also misogynistic AF, if there’s a daugher, then the lineage doesn’t record their decendents. So dumb, as I guy, I hate this patriarchal bullshit)

      • crank0271@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Some aspects of that tradition are commendable, though. It would be neat to see this updated in a less male-centric fashion.

          • Mac@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Tradition is just narcissists convincing you to do things their way because change is ✨scary✨

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Sure, but what if the dead people are right? Statistically, they will be some share of the time.

            The catch is that that goes for all the various disagreeing traditions. Putting priority on your own is sus.

      • thisorthatorwhatever@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think the opposite with happen with the same results. Everyone’s DNA will be on the books. It’ll be revealed that we’re all related somehow. You’ll be able to orient the database any way that you want to see how you’re related.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      With the U.S. only being 250 years old, I can’t say anyone would remember presidents in 600 years. If the U.S. is gone there will likely be mention of 1 president that was in power when whatever came and took/changed it. During the planetary destruction revolution there was a plethora of wasteful greed. They called it an industrial revolution that ran rampant with greed and wastefulness.

      • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 months ago

        History preserved the names of heads of state from countries that had a much shorter existence or impact. 600 years might seem a long time to Americans but it’s not that long for historical memory.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Sure, then everything in history would be “remembered” forever… Except no one would know or care. To me, that is not remembered.

          I would say Jesus is forgotten completely at this point even though he is written/read everywhere

      • snooggums@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        We record these kinds of things in archives as they go along. Hell, we have records of Egyptian and Roman leadership going back centuries.

    • Lena@gregtech.eu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s quite sad tbh, we’re all just tiny specks on the timeline of humans

      • Marshezezz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s your’s to make of it what you will. It doesn’t have to be sad. It’s pretty incredible any of us are here in the first place with how many conditions had to be present for life to even be on earth. And then we evolved from single cell organisms into these complex beings that we are today. It’s pretty fucking nuts and fascinating.

      • snooggums@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I am 100% in favor of being forgotten, because trying to stand out in the sea of billions of people is a ridiculous expectation.

    • Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      While that’s true, we have much more extensive record keeping these days. I’ve been researching my family tree, and 100 years ago there were still a decent number of people who were mostly illiterate. Add to that documents like the census being handwritten in cursive on paper, and you get lots of errors being recorded, and the records themselves being damaged by age.

      Unless something drastic happens, a lot of our records will still exist in the centuries to come. It will mostly be our official records, but they should still be there :)

        • Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s not just names in lists though. Using my mother’s grandparents as examples, I know where they were born and grew up, I know who they lived with at multiple points in their lives, and I know a few of the places where they lived.

          I know where and when they got married, and some of the guests, and I know what children they had and when. As they were adults at the time, I know some of what my great grandfather was doing during the first World War and how he died.

          I haven’t done a deep dive into their lives yet as I’ve been working backwards, but I’ve already got a decent idea about who they were and what they were like. I know a fair bit about his parents and family too, as I checked that side first.

          The biggest issues are finding photos, and the cost and availability of records. There are not many photos due to them not being as pervasive at the time, and there are not many records because a lot of things either weren’t recorded or weren’t saved. Both of those can be solved with the technology we have now. Lots of people have their own information saved, separate to the official sources, and it’s easier to have multiple copies of everything, so they won’t get lost or destroyed as easily.

          Hopefully this means that we’ll remember more of the past going forwards :)

  • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 months ago

    “It’s my estimation that every man ever got a statue made of him was one kind of sommbitch or another.”

    No one needs to remember me except my kids. Maybe my grandkids.

  • Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    I imagine some archivists might find the lost fragments of this server is some ruins and by some miracle, maybe extract this very thread.

  • palordrolap@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Brave of you to assume that humanity will exist in 600 years.

    Actually, we might be, but the better-off ones will be back at sticks and stones and huddling around wood fires and the like.

  • thatradomguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    There’s a running phrase that gets’ mentioned a lot in the Peanuts comic strip: “500 years from now, who’ll know the difference?”

    Just wanted to mention that. Peace ✌️

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    No, but AIs will be able to generate a statistically accurate simulacrum of a set of people like us.

      • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I find it odd that natural disaster isn’t on your list considering it’s by far the most realistic scenario. Hell, it’s already happening.

        I guess the word “natural” isn’t very accurate for a climate disaster, but still, it’s not on your list.

        • Technically, climate change by itself isn’t what will destroy civilization, its the aftermath, mainly, the crops wouldn’t be able to grow properly in a fucked up temperaure, weather, ecosystem…

          Similar to “old age” in humans, nobody “dies of old age” in of itself, rather, its the complications that result from old age.

      • Marshezezz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        We sure are a dumb species. We’re able to construct all this stuff using the world around us but we can’t seems to figure out working together instead of constantly competing

  • Fyrnyx@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    No.

    Because history remembers people or groups who have made astounding and monumental moments that change the course of history.

    They aren’t going to remember a dude who spent most of their time jerking off and doing the average lifestyle.

    And why 600 years?

  • GrayBackgroundMusic@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Doesn’t even take that long. My parent passed away and left boxes of pictures from 50 to 75 years ago and no one recognizes. Why did they have these pictures and boxes of them? No notes. Nothing.