• DoubleDongle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    127
    ·
    4 months ago

    Hehehe. It’d be hilarious to see the whole prosecution fail because they were unsustainably aggressive and sloppy.

  • Pogogunner@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    115
    ·
    4 months ago

    It would be amazing if Luigi doesn’t even have to go through a trial because Trump cannot keep his mouth shut about anything.

    • FenrirIII@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 months ago

      Reporters need to start baiting Trump and DOJ shills. Force them to break and ruin any chance of this going to trial

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    113
    ·
    4 months ago

    Well, well, well, if it isn’t the consequences of replacing competent career government officials with stooges.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 months ago

      LOL, as if Democrats wouldn’t have railroaded him too. They 100% support the health care system that is killing people.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Conservative Justification: You have to be patient, and give the process time to gain momentum. If you need to accelerate the process, then more conservative policies need to be implemented, more harshly.

      I’ve been hearing that for literally 40 years. Shouldn’t those policies have kicked in by now?

      Oh, right, they did.

    • phx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Well, that and the murder-friendly administration publicly announcing that you’re going to pursue the death penalty hard probably makes it a whole lot less likely people are gonna try a plea

  • shittydwarf@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    4 months ago

    Hilarious, they were so thirsty to bust someone they fumbled literally everything. Their evidence chain of custody was fucked, no way to prove it’s authentic or untampered

    • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      80
      ·
      4 months ago

      I knew it was horseshit the moment they just found the three things that were impossible to find “from a good Samaritan” all in one neat place. Look at this man right here, he has suspect, motive, and murder weapon on his person’s right now!

      This whole case stinks like shit.

      • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 months ago

        The actual killer was good enough to escape and hide for days. He’s long gone and hiding now. Not in a McD’s with all his evidence.

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          Their facial recognition software gave them some people that vaguely resembled the killer. They dug through their backgrounds and found a queer kid living in a youth hostel, someone estranged from their family. If you were going to pick an innocent person to pin this on, he’s the classic type. Cops have been pinning unsolved crimes on drifters and other undesirables for centuries.

          Want to know what I want to know? Where is Luigi’s workshop? That’s my question. How the hell do you print out, machine, refine, prototype, and build a 3D printed gun while living in homeless shelters and youth hostels?

          Printing a gun is not like printing a page on a laser printer. It can be done, but it requires a long iterative process and a whole workshop worth of tools. If you want to convince me Luigi made a 3D printed gun, then you damn well better be able to show me his workshop.

          So again. Where is Luigi’s workshop?

  • LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    4 months ago

    True americans knew day one that this whole case is botched and ruined since the administration politicized it and the healthcare CEO’s made it to be WAY more than it was.

    Hopefully he is let go and we can start arresting and charge the criminals running our country right now. It’s gonna take years to charge all the people in the white house, so the sooner we start, the better.

      • Cruel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Healthcare businesses will always be responsible for saving and taking life. Are you wanting to dissuade anyone from ever working in healthcare and thus dismantle it entirely?

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          4 months ago

          Bullshit. In sane countries, if a doctor bills a service, the insurance simply has to pay it. In most health systems, if a licensed doc bills what is a normal unexceptional standard procedure for a condition, the insurance simply has to pay it. They’re a licensed doctor. That’s just one of the powers of their position. If an insurance company thinks a doctor is committing fraud, they can haul them in front of the medical licensing board and make them justify their diagnoses and treatments. Sane countries simply do not allow insurance companies to arbitrarily deny coverage for non-experimental, non-cosmetic medical treatment. If a doc sets a broken arm, insurance isn’t even allowed to try and weasel their way out of covering it.

          Most medical systems around the world work like this - by simply trusting the judgement of state licensed physicians. They do this, and the sky doesn’t fall. And we’re the ones stuck with the most expensive medical system on the planet.

          Brian Robert Thompson, the serial killer that murdered 40,000 innocent people, did so by overruling doctors for profit by denying life saving medical care. In most countries his actions would have been a national scandal that would have seen him in a cell for the rest of his life. He was a mass murderer personally responsible for a dozen 9/11s. He literally dwarfed the body count of Osama bin Ladin.

          • Cruel@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            You didn’t disprove my statement.

            To disprove it, you would have to claim that these “sane countries” do not deny any life-saving treatment, thus never taking life. Yet every single one of them has limitations in their services. They’re replacing the insurance denial with a system-level denial by means of a narrow scope of provided services. Insurance can’t deny what’s never provided.

            So, for clarity, are you claiming that these “sane” healthcare systems never let people die due to treatment that is too expensive?

            Brian Robert Thompson, the serial killer that murdered 40,000 innocent people … He was a mass murderer personally responsible for a dozen 9/11s. He literally dwarfed the body count of Osama bin Ladin.

            I know you’re trying to cope with your bloodlust by dehumanizing him as much as possible. But this sort of logic makes anyone with a dollar in their pocket into a murderer. It’s insane, and you know it.

            • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              You’re just classist when it comes to your views on violence. You don’t actually care about human death and suffering; you only care about optics. You’re perfectly happy with someone murdering tens of thousands of people as long as they wear a suit and use a pen as their murder weapon. Sorry, but if you concoct an insurance system that is deliberately designed to remove people from the life-saving care that they are legally entitled to receive as part of their insurance plan? If you deliberately design a Kafkaesque nightmare literally designed to make people die of their conditions before they’re able to navigate through all the hurdles you place in their path? If you do all of this just to drive your stock price higher? You are every bit as much a murderer as any psychopath that carves people apart with a knife.

              And no, this scarcity mentality is bullshit. Yes, there are always some novel, experimental, and ridiculously expensive treatments that need to be denied for cost reasons. But no system, private or public, covers those, so there’s no point considering them for this discussion. But bog-standard well-established treatment do not need to be rationed. No one is going on chemotherapy just for fun. You absolutely can have a system where no one dies from lack of affording standard well-established medical treatments. The US is the outlier here. The rest of the developed world doesn’t have this problem; only us. Yet you’re here, having gouged your own eyes out to willfully blind yourself, saying that you simply cannot see a way how this can be done!

        • kreskin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          United health cares experiments with randomly denying care falls under “saving life” to you? Seems like capitlist excess and murder to me. They have the highest denial of claims rate by far of any insurer. And they trusted claim denials to AI in order to save money, which they knew for a fact had a 90% error rate, such that 9 of 10 claims it denied were reversed on appeal. Only some people did not appeal, they just died having not appealed, or died waiting for the appeal process. Appeals take 60 days. During that 60 days people simply are denied the care their doctors are shouting that they need. Does being made to just sit and wait 60 days for your first appeal while a treatable cancer eats your insides sound ethical to you? You might get pissed during that wait period eh? Might start doing some target practice. If you did I wouldn’t blame you one little bit. Self defense is what that is.

          https://www.cbsnews.com/news/unitedhealth-lawsuit-ai-deny-claims-medicare-advantage-health-insurance-denials/

          "The lawsuit, filed last Tuesday in federal court in Minnesota, claims UnitedHealth illegally denied “elderly patients care owed to them under Medicare Advantage Plans” by deploying an AI model known by the company to have a 90% error rate, overriding determinations made by the patients’ physicians that the expenses were medically necessary.

          There IS such a thing as criminal mismanagement of a corporate entity, and I think united health care corporation deserves the corporate death penalty for this, and their executives who green lit this program should be imprisoned to the fullest penalty the law can provide for criminal negligence. THIS is exactly why everyone celebrates Mangione. And if laws dont exist to hold these people to account, we need politicians who will make some.

          • Cruel@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Nothing has to be run for profit.

            And it’s an irrelevant statement. A non-profit healthcare outfit would still be responsible for saving and taking life.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    4 months ago

    I keep saying it: The one thing that may still save us, is their virtuosic incompetence. All we have to do is give these apes enough rope, and they will eventually hang themselves.

    The problem is all the damage they’ll do before then.

  • anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    4 months ago

    Did anyone actually think he’s gonna get a fair trial? He’s obviously a patsy set up because they couldn’t find the real guy anyway. Who actually carries the weapon on the bus with them? The real one is probably at the bottom of the East River.

    • Cruel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Pretty sure they didn’t commit a crime. And it’s not uncommon for these things to happen in high profile cases. A “fair trial” is very difficult.

  • CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s funny that of all the alleged murderers that end up in court, The put a ballistic vest on Luigi we certainly ain’t gonna shoot him) just to make him look more dangerous.

    • Ordinary_Person@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 months ago

      “we” aren’t. But the Bootlickers might try to. But I agree that it’s to make him look more dangerous. Because they certainly wouldn’t give a shit if a red hat shot him.

  • brem@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 months ago

    Forcing that handsome man into a bullet proof vest in an attempt to make him look like a Batman villain should be enough evidence on its own for this to be thrown out.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      it being inferred he was a left wing extremist like some others in the news right now was so stupid… dummies…

      I have to disagree because I think this conclusion is a trap.

      The people listening to that stuff and eating it up? Yeah, dummies.

      The people SAYING that stuff though? It feels very intentional because it’s a win-win for them. At the beginning they get the base riled up, donating, and engaging with the propaganda machine. Then later on when Luigi suddenly gets off on a technicality, the outrage over that fuels even more furor, donating, and posting/watching.

      Conservatives live on outrage. It is irresistible to them. Especially to the white persecution complex ones like my extended family, god damn.