• Noah@fosscad.ioOPMB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    u/RedBarnRescue · 2024-09-10 12:52:32 UTC · score 22

    The devices “can transform a street corner into a combat zone, devastating entire communities,” Monaco said.

    As we all know, it doesn’t count as a real “combat zone” unless the fire rate is in the 4-digit range. Shot by a semi-auto? Wasn’t real combat, walk it off.

  • Noah@fosscad.ioOPMB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    u/Spoygoe · 2024-09-10 20:09:51 UTC · score 3

    The irony of this decision would be that what they really want to prevent is home manufacture of firearms. This requirement to alter the programming in 3D printers is probably is probably the least effective way you could go about it.

    Also, the cheapest and easiest printers in the hobby are manufactured by the Chinese, and those guys don’t give a single fuck what the US government thinks.

  • Noah@fosscad.ioOPMB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    u/ejwoamwkamdkw998 · 2024-09-10 14:58:40 UTC · score 2

    heavy breathing from REPRAP guys

    id love to see them try to enforce this shit.

    do they think that some fuck in china selling a ramps 1.4 motor controller kit on aliexpress gives a fuck about the laws in the US?

  • Noah@fosscad.ioOPMB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    u/Iwillnotcomply1791 · 2024-09-10 11:06:51 UTC · score 288

    Ever heard of jailbreaking software? Or The Voron Project for that matter. Or just ripping out thw motherboard and replaving it with your own motherboard.

    3D printers are actually mechanically very simple, much simpler than inkjet or laser printers. Just two sets of stepper motors and some bearings on rails and a heated nozzle and a frame to hold everything together.

    They can’t even stop counterfeiting even with patters on all banknotes and software rhat prohibits printing banknotes.

    • Noah@fosscad.ioOPMB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      u/BuckABullet · 2024-09-10 19:59:26 UTC · score 7

      A modest proposal: I would love to see someone develop a homebrew board for the Bambu that eliminates the WiFi “phone home” features. Just a basic controller that sits there mute and runs the printer. Would be a nice safety feature. Unfortunately it’s outside my are of expertise: anybody here that wants to run with that?

      • Noah@fosscad.ioOPMB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        u/they_have_bagels · 2024-09-11 00:14:08 UTC · score 1

        Literally just disconnect it from the network? You have to move your prints by usb but it can’t report anything if it doesn’t have a network connection.

        Plus, I’m pretty sure that there are countless HomeAutomation integrations using the built-in MQTT server and ftp server to upload, start, and monitor prints. You could probably piece something together if you really care that much. X1 series only, as it runs full linux.

        Really, though, a pi + klipper + any supported printer is going to be an easier “off the grid” solution.

        • Noah@fosscad.ioOPMB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          u/BuckABullet · 2024-09-11 20:03:10 UTC · score 1

          I get those options. However, having the software in place to reach out to the server is unsettling. Without reviewing the source code you can never be sure what it gets up to. Having a version that doesn’t want to communicate is better, and having a version that lacks the hardware to communicate is best. Hence my suggestion for a new board.

      • Noah@fosscad.ioOPMB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        u/Iwillnotcomply1791 · 2024-09-10 23:27:47 UTC · score 3

        Good idea, although the Voron project exists, and the Ender printers don’t need to be online to do anything, a retrofit piece of hardware or jailbreak software for Bambus, or HP printers for that matter would be much appreciated.

        • Noah@fosscad.ioOPMB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          u/they_have_bagels · 2024-09-11 00:16:19 UTC · score 2

          There’s X1Plus already, third party software for the X1. You can officially enable your X1 to allow it to run third party software. No need to jailbreak.

          You don’t even need to do anything and can use it as is if you use an sd card or usb drive and walk over to the printer.

          • Noah@fosscad.ioOPMB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            u/Iwillnotcomply1791 · 2024-09-11 08:58:40 UTC · score 3

            The bambu X1 allows support for thord party software? That’s nice. Now we need it for HP printers so we can use third party cartridges. HP does make some good printers, but they are now all software locked and compainies like them are very copyright abuse heavy and jailbreaks don’d have the same demand as pirated movies so jailbreaks are not that wideapread.

    • Noah@fosscad.ioOPMB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      u/One-Chemist-2852 · 2024-09-10 16:49:51 UTC · score 11

      I was just thinking this, I own two vorons, built with my own two hands. If you can print a firearm, you can build a printer.

      • Noah@fosscad.ioOPMB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        u/Iwillnotcomply1791 · 2024-09-10 16:10:12 UTC · score 10

        Yup. Or more charges and more serious charges, even if they most likey won’t stick will encourage you to take a plea deal.

    • Noah@fosscad.ioOPMB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      u/2Drogdar2Furious · 2024-09-10 12:14:46 UTC · score 190

      The point isnt that work arounds aren’t possible it’s that you shouldn’t have to work around infringement to exercise your rights.

      • Noah@fosscad.ioOPMB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        u/Iwillnotcomply1791 · 2024-09-10 15:59:38 UTC · score 58

        I know, however as a person from the Asia-Pacific region who does 3D guns (I think you can guess how legal my 3D2A thing is, myy IP is a TOR exit node for a reason), we need to think pragmatically on how to resust the inevtiable 3D2A crackdown.

        • Noah@fosscad.ioOPMB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          u/lordofmmo · 2024-09-10 16:17:29 UTC · score 20

          I admire your dedication by running a tor exit node, but it’s basically a bat-signal for your country’s feds

          • Noah@fosscad.ioOPMB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            u/Iwillnotcomply1791 · 2024-09-10 16:25:54 UTC · score 23

            Sorry, I don’t actually run a TOR exit node (though if I can immgrate to the USA or become a dictator or something that will change), I just only use the TOR network to access this online profile or anything else that is legall questionable where I am.

            • Noah@fosscad.ioOPMB
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              u/Applejaxc · 2024-09-10 17:32:21 UTC · score 9

              If you have any non illicit activities you also access on the same computer, sometimes with TOR on and sometimes with TOR off, you’re creating a breadcrumb trail

                • Noah@fosscad.ioOPMB
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  u/Applejaxc · 2024-09-10 20:40:55 UTC · score 9

                  Let’s say for example that you use the same PC to do something illegal, like look up anti Russian government info while living in Russia. You also use the same PC for your email, which is never used for anything illegal.

                  You turn your VPN on and look up Russian government news. You also check your email. There is a record of the same IP/computer/digital fingerprint for your searches as there is for accessing your email.

                  You are done committing crimes and turn your PC off.

                  Later you want to check your email, so you turn your PC on. You aren’t planning to do any crimes, so you leave your VPN off. You sign into your email. Now you have an unmasked digital finger print tied to that email account.

                  Now we assume the Russian government is suddenly very competent. They discover some TOR IP keeps looking up anti government stuff, but if ALSO uses a certain Gmail account. Russia can’t break the TOR network and can’t get your info, but it can figure out what email account was used. Now they don’t need to beat TOR, they just have to get your email provider to share the IP addresses that have been used to sign into your account. One address is your legal unmasked activity, one address is your masked illegal activity. Which means the authorities can prove the TOR traffic is yours. Which makes the TOR/VPN protection meaningless.

                  It’s like using a condom with 99 hookers and rolling the dice on #100. And it’s like a criminal who visits the same business every day for months, and then drives the same car when they decide to break in after hours. Their ski mask doesn’t help hide their identity if everyone recognizes their car. Your digital traffic can be very similar.

  • Noah@fosscad.ioOPMB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    u/Sarge013 · 2024-09-10 13:15:11 UTC · score 10

    *Laughs in Voron* Good luck with that.

    Even if they were able to somehow put it into law, there is absolutely no way you could actually enforce it.

  • Noah@fosscad.ioOPMB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    u/Gaydolf-Litler · 2024-09-10 15:05:11 UTC · score 10

    Can’t take the FOSS out of FOSSCAD.

    Free, open source software is huge with 3d printing. We can build marlin and klipper from source. If something gets added to the source to prevent guns…

    spams backspace

    • Noah@fosscad.ioOPMB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      u/Dubaku · 2024-09-10 21:16:55 UTC · score 1

      I would put money on them not even knowing what a firmware is

  • Noah@fosscad.ioOPMB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    u/Snowdeo720 · 2024-09-10 12:34:38 UTC · score 19

    They also wanted to make vendors provide back doors to their disk encryption processes.

    Idiots.

  • Noah@fosscad.ioOPMB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    u/Impossible_Pizza_948 · 2024-09-11 18:37:11 UTC · score 1

    They don’t like the fact that they’re losing control, so they’re doing anything they can to regain that lost power

  • Noah@fosscad.ioOPMB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    u/hatsofftoeverything · 2024-09-10 12:23:29 UTC · score 24

    Oh boy here we go again XD it’s like every fuckin election cycle now they talk about this and we remind them it’s firing impossible to do that

  • Noah@fosscad.ioOPMB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    u/TerrorBytesx · 2024-09-11 12:16:49 UTC · score 1

    It’s impossible to enforce, they do this and then people will just run custom firmware