Transcription

A series of Tweets by @Foone, each replying to the last:

Here’s the question I always have with universal translators in sci-fi: how do they know when to stop translation? Like say an alien asks about deserts on earth, and the human lists “the sahara desert, gobi desert and kalahari desert” Alien: You just said “desert” six times.

(“Sahara” is Arabic for “desert”. “Gobi” is Mongolian for “desert”, and “Kalahari” is Tswana for “desert”)

Man, the aliens are going to think we’re so bad at naming. Cause really, aren’t we?
Brit: Behold, the beautiful River Avon!
Alien: Ahh, the River River. You humans have such a knack for naming things.

“Here we are in Chad, looking upon the mighty Lake Chad!”
"Ahh yes, the land of Lake, bordering the Lake Lake. Another fine human name. "

“And here’s Nyanza Lac, in Burundi. As you can tell by the fact that it’s named Lake Lake in Bantu & French, it’s a la… actually this one’s a city. A city named Lake Lake”

    • bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 months ago

      You find Novi Grad, Nowgorod, and variations all over Slavic Europe, which also means new city.

      Nouvelle Village in France. Novaci in Romania as well.

      Probably exists in many languages and regions.

    • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      Same in France with “neuve”, also “franche” which indicated a special tax exempt status.
      So those usually have something to distinguish them from the others.
      Like a river they are sat on or some mountain nearby. One of my favourite such name is Laneuveville-devant-Nancy : TheNewTown-Infrontof-Nancy (Nancy being a bigger city nearby). It has a strong named-by-modern-programmers energy…

  • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    5 months ago

    First of all you don’t need aliens for this, all you need is different languages and we already have those, we even have something close to universal translators, so much for sci-fi. Any decent universal translator would know that for example Sahara is a name in English and would try to either translate the name to the corresponding name in the target language if it has one or just as a name. It doesn’t matter what the origin of the word is, it’s a name. Sticking with Sahara as an example, you can translate “Sahara desert” to Arabic and back and you wouldn’t get “desert desert”. It actually has a name in Arabic that is something like “the greatest desert” and I assume that for most of those places there exist other names.

    • Leonixster
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      What did you just say? Chai tea?! ‘Chai’ means tea, bro! You’re saying ‘tea tea!’ Would I ask you for a ‘coffee coffee’ with room for ‘cream cream?’

  • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    One of the many reasons why the only universal translator that makes sense is the Babel Fish

  • WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    There’s a book called my buddy have be a starship that actually deals with this sort of. Translator keeps calling earth “dirt” to an alien that has only one word for dirt. Many jokes about that sort of thing throughout.

  • omega_x3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    What do you call this planet? Earth And what do you call the ground that you dig up? Earth but it is only capital because it is at the beginning of the sentence otherwise it is earth. Do you pronounce Earth and earth differently? No Ok what do you call the big rocks that orbit planets? Moons And let me guess you call your moon, Moon? Some people prefer Lunar Isn’t that just moon in a different language? Yes

    • lordnikon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well, nobody who’s ever lived on the moon calls it Luna, either. That’s just something they say on Earth.

  • asg101
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    They also named a city in California “Lake Forest” while having neither a lake nor a forest.

  • Ethalis@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    Not sure if that’s specifically an English issue or if other language work the same way, but I do know that, in French, I would just say “le Sahara” and would only say “le désert du Sahara” if I’m talking to someone who really sucks at geography.

    Same for rivers, I would just say “l’Avon” unless I suspect my interlocutor doesn’t know it’s a river, in which case I would probably simply add “you know, the river in Great Britain”

    • Zagorath@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      Without actually doing any research or analysis, I feel like in English we’d say “the Sahara” slightly more often than “the Sahara desert”, but both are pretty common. I don’t think I would ever just say “the Avon”, but I would just say “the Thames”. So I think it comes down to how large the object looms in my mind, whether it feels acceptable not to include the descriptor.

      • Ethalis@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Oh we definitely have tons of tautological names for places, France has a big history of different cultures mixing and old languages merging together. What I meant is we don’t tend to add nouns to describe things, like in “X river”, “Y mountain” or even “Z fruit”.

  • lumpenproletariat@quokk.auM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think we need to look at how the universal translator works to answer this. Does it listen to the sounds and guess the meaning from a limited sample of words, does it scan your mind/network for information?

    • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      They can just distinguish between sounds better than us. What sounds to you like “Arrgh-rrrrr-wwwww” is actually 444hz (0.1 sec), 446hz (0.2 sec), 440 hz (0.1 sec), 339hz (0.4 sec), 338.5 hz (0.2 sec), 110 hz (0.05 sec), 194hz (0.04 sec), 889hz (0.2 sec), 105hz (0.1 sec), 110hz (0.14 sec). It translates to “tree on the wind of summer, with red moss,” if I remember my wookie correctly.*

      spoiler

      *this is totally made up. It’s actually wookie for chewing tobacco dog. **

      **This is also totally made up, though chewbacca does come from a russian word for dog, and in the french translation it sounds like the word for tobacco.