• Damage@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Nevermind users, at least the can choose to get rid of those, what about random people passing by?

  • dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    5 months ago

    A video doorbell sales dude tried giving me one for free. I said “I don’t want your company to spy on my neighbors so they can hand it off to the cops without my say-so” and he looked at me like I’m stupid.

  • MoonMelon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    Every town around me have installed these fucking things, covering every major route. In order to get out of my local area without being tracked I have to drive on some serious hillbilly roads. It’s exhausting.

    • Policeshootout@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      I use reolink cameras isolated to their own VLAN and strictly controlled. NVR is an Intel NUC with Coral running Frigate. It was the cheapest/best solution for me. Tough to find things that aren’t insanely expensive.

    • Sarcasmo220@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      I found the Lorex brand of products that stores footage locally. Internet connection is not required either, as it is either hardwired or paired directly with the NVR wirelessly.

  • SecurityPro@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    Key point: "Flock users can request that Ring doorbell users share footage to help with “evidence collection and investigative work.”

    This is not any kind of live link. It is just another way to request a specific video recording be shared by the user. The user has full control. Ring already has the same system in place on their “neighborhood” platform.