• ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      5 months ago

      Providing housing and paying them a shit wage is slave labor too but you get the benefit of them paying their money back into the company store so it’s cheaper.

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      5 months ago

      Here’s a reminder that there are nearly 14,000,000 vacant houses in America, and less than 650,000 homeless people. The math comes out to ~22 vacant houses for every single homeless person. I’ll give you one guess which income bracket owns the vast majority of those vacant houses…

        • papalonian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          5 months ago

          Well duh, they’re on the street because they’re experiencing decision paralysis on what house to live in that day.

      • BanMe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        They know goddamn well a big contingent is willing to if they had the opportunity, so they’ve gone to great lengths to avoid such possibilities.

        This should intrigue people who like a challenge idk

  • blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s “expensive” in the “right” way. The costs are paid by taxes, which are largely supplied by the 99%. The revenue, by contrast, is privatized, going to corporations owned by the 1%.

    So it’s only “expensive” for the masses, which lawmakers don’t care about.

    • theparadox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 months ago

      How about house them in a way that take away their voting rights and use them as cheap labor? Member how prisoners were used to fight the Palisades fires in January?

      Don’t forget the expensive housing is provided by a for-profit prison system. It’s expensive for taxpayers, but someone else is getting rich.

  • Xerxos@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s not that expensive if you use them as slave labor and ignore their human rights… Well, still expensive for the tax payers, but who cares for those peasants? /s

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      How about organs? I’m about done with this liver and I could use a bigger penis.

  • Ava
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    Well, there WAS that thing a couple of months ago where Kilmeade said the quiet part out loud, suggesting we should execute them.

    • Eq0@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      In particular if you look at the long term (even just a couple of years): many homeless just need a little help to start climbing the ladder again. So housing and mental care would allow them to quickly become productive members of society. Prisons just lock them into a circle of poverty.

  • Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s an investment by the megacorps (with gov monies) into keeping the plebs in check, to not get any ideas around equity, social reform, tax increases, megacorp regulation (consumer prices/margins cap), higher wages, etc.

    It’s super effective.

    The same infrastructure can also be recycled in event of a full-on fascist gov.

    • seejur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not only that. The housing is then maintained by taxpayers, who are not the rich strata. So it’s another way to funnel money from the poor/middle class to the corporation owned by the rich.

  • Ardens@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    We? How about “we” remove the rich, so that homelessness is only a frie and true choice if you want to be traveling?

    The only people who’d like there to be homeless people are the rich and powerful.