1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards

https://lemmy.ml/u/davel

2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?

Community Ban

3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).

image

4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).

image
(I have not posted there)

Likewise the community has no rules listed, so I’m not sure how I’ve broken rule 4

image


Davel is probably going to try to claim me downvoting a post or comment of his that popped up on my feed or something as me breaking the entire instances rule 4 (no spam?) - which is why I need to be banned only from one community I don’t engage in.

Lemmy.ml admin Davel has been rage downvoting my posts a lot lately, even going so far as to downvote me telling real legitimate antisemites to ‘fuck off’.

image

Even CowBee had the decency to admit they were in the wrong and change their ragevote to an upvote.

Davel however seems to especially thinskinned even for the typical .ML’er and would rather double down and engage in poorly disguised retaliation bans for criticisms of a political ideology.

This thought terminating behaviour on display by one of the admins of such a reputable and outstanding instance as Lemmy.ml was not at all warranted and I hereby call on the leadership at lemmy.ML to unban me so that I may continue to not post in their community.

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    4 months ago

    Getting banned from communities you don’t even post on, Lemmy really is a full featured Reddit replacement.

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    PTB, it was probably because you keep triggering them in /c/leftymemes. Also lol at the hexbears in here calling YDI because their feelings are constantly being hurt.

    EDIT: Omegalul at all the salt below.

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Weird how they came in here suddenly.

      B-but it was on all of our front pages! Ignore when we post it, link it, screenshot everyone, on our Slop community! Then talk about how much we hate them but don’t do anything to stop getting angry about it on the same community!

      Edit: it keeps happening, wow I’m so shocked.

      Edit 2: on the front page of Slop, users from Hexbear commented and then went to the post being discussed https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/59235577?scrollToComments=true

      “But we don’t do that! Lemme just prove we do!”

    • lumpenproletariat@quokk.auOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      Thanks. I don’t mean to rock the boat so often in your house, it’s just where all the good comms are. Let me know if it’s ever too much and I’ll stop.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.mlBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      Jesus Christ, you’re really going to look at their behavior and praise it for, essential, “triggering the libs”? You are basically just a right wing chud so long as it’s attacking communists

    • Nima@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      I normally agree with most of your sentiments, but not this one. if anything it seems the most sodium is coming from you and a couple other commenters in this thread. I hope you know I mean no disrespect.

      I’m not one to defend hexbears. in fact most of the time I’m wary of anyone with that instance username, but in this case I think you’re being a bit unfair.

      I have OP labeled as a troublemaker as I’ve seen him behaving poorly in a few places. swearing at people and calling them tankies just for disagreeing with him, etc.

      I don’t think this is a left/right/hexbear/instance war- thing. it may just plainly be a “not nice” thing.

        • Nima@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 months ago

          nothing, I just don’t think many of the hex commenters in this thread are being all that salty (which nobody finds more surprising than myself). most seem to have found the thread through normal channels.

          maybe there’s stuff going on behind the scenes that I am not aware of, and I’m wrong. its entirely possible.

          but just from an outsider perspective, it seems most are behaving fairly decently.

      • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        It totally isn’t because you’re a serial ragebaiter or anything, or your foul attitude. No, it’s totally because of thought crimes. LMAO

  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mlBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    YDI.

    You’ve equated communists to Nazis and said “tankie fucks deserve to get their heads bashed in.” Extremely aggressive 100% of the time whenever you encounter a Marxist of any sort. With that context, it isn’t unreasonable to ban you when it would already be a clear misfit for you to participate in a Marxist community, be it via voting or otherwise. It wasn’t an instance ban, you’re still free to comment on the socialist comm, anarchist comm, etc as far as I can tell, just not on the communist comm.

    As for the bit on antisemitism, the comment was removed and all you said was “fuck off,” so myself and presumably others made rash assumptions. This isn’t ill-founded though, you had posted Nazi apologia for Nazi collaborators released from prison that went on to lynch Jewish people and communists on the very same thread simply because they opposed the soviets. This is well and truly beyond the standard left-punching the post was for. I feel that this context is necessary because your post directly calls my reputation into question in the post body.

    • ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      4 months ago

      saying that you’re wrong and your grokepedia sources are bullshit is not nazi apologia.
      people can disagree with the factual content of what you’re saying without being a nazi.
      stupid tankie trolls.

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        It implies they could go outside, but they would rather be in the bubble in their room than actually go outside and be productive to their causes.

        Not like any of them actually could fight for something they believe in. They read theory but don’t apply it.

  • Grainne@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    4 months ago

    PTB.

    I am so sorry you’ve had to go through this awful experience. It is entirely unsurprising for that mod in particular. Extremely defensive 100% of the time whenever they encounter an Anarchist.

    • lumpenproletariat@quokk.auOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      4 months ago

      Thank you for your continued support, I am considering legal action to recover the monetary damages for how distressed I am by this unprovoked rageban.

          • cuckmaster69@lemmy.billiam.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            lol where’s the troll besides someone “seeking legal action” against an online community that has apparently caused them sufficient distress to merit damages, whilst they’ve self-admitted they’ve never participated in said community? what a victim mentality.nobody is owed participation in an online community, and if someone has predetermined that you aren’t allowed in their communities, you should call them an asshole and move on with your life if you even care that much. jfc what delusions are people under that they think there’s any actionably legal consequences to something like this?

            • BurgerBaron@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              4 months ago

              Okay so you’ve either proven you can’t parse obvious sarcasm or you’re still an unimpressive troll. Congrats.

              • cuckmaster69@lemmy.billiam.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 months ago

                honestly, given the rest of his comments, i’m not giving the benefit of the doubt on sarcasm anymore. if you’re this upset about a ban from a community you’ve never interacted with, then it seems odd to be upset enough to document things this thoroughly and make a drama based post about it. you can’t drop sarcasm like that whilst ostensibly acting genuinely in a manner befitting that which you’re professing to mock via sarcasm.

                Edit to add: the reason sarcasm works is because people are supposed to be on the same page about things. reputation matters in interpersonal sarcasm, e.g. i can make much more sarcastic deadpan jokes in a group of friends whilst i wouldn’t do the same when i’m talking to a random person in public. on the internet, and especially on a federated network, it is difficult to assume a reputation when many instances interact. thus it seems reasonable to assume that, given what i’ve seen on this thread, he’s not being sarcastic.

      • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        4 months ago

        considering their immediate reaction to me complaining about their misogynistic post title was to perm ban me for ‘homophobia’ I’m pretty comfortable saying that they’re the thin skinned one

  • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 months ago

    Amazing display of left unity today by Hexbear.

    We can’t call out bad faith actions and active spamming to tire people out, but they will gladly jump down your throat.

    They can ban people for asking too many questions but if we ban them we aren’t leftists.

    You call them out it’s a tirade and a rant. You give them links to show they have a bias, you’re the bad guy.

    Rules for thee not for me is what Stalin wanted after all, it’s just praxis for them. Can’t wait to see how many are angry at us for not obeying their rules on another instance.

    Blah blah “but muh all” blah blah “post hog” blah blah “you just hate us for causing a mess and cleaning it up”. Hope you guys have jobs and interact with real humans and stop LARPing as the revolutionaries Stalin would have shot when they stopped being useful.

    Amazing how to some we’re the Tankies when we didn’t say Stalin wasnt Christ reborn and we get spammed with it. I come back from work and I have more messages than when I upset someone with a bot farm.

    Left unity my ass. We can’t criticize you but you’ll kill Makhno and say you did us a favor. Can’t wait until Hexbear circlejerks about this and swear this time for real they’ll defed from us.

  • ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    Lemmy.ml admin Davel has been rage downvoting my posts a lot lately

    the lack of effective blocking is what really kills Lemmy….
    it’s like it was custom made for harassment and brigading.

    • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      If I block someone - I never see their content, posts, or messages to me again.

      What aspect is ineffective?

      • ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        Lemmy.ml admin Davel has been rage downvoting my posts a lot lately

        this someone can still follow you and downvote everything you post, and comment on everything you post, and all you’ve done is make it so you can’t tell.

        • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I mean… I guess that’s not ideal? On the other hand, they keep wasting their time, and I get on with my life. So I’m OK with it this way.

            • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Well now I’m not sure what you’re after. If it turns into brigading that’s a separate issue, and blocking one or two users from seeing your post won’t fix that, right?

      • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        In most cases, you’d want a block to go both directions. Imagine you’re being stalked by a user. In its current implementation, blocking that user won’t stop the stalking, because they can still see and interact with your posts. You simply won’t be able to see their interactions. If they comment on your post, you won’t see it because you have them blocked. But your block does not prevent them from seeing, voting on, or commenting on your post.

        Essentially, lemmy’s current block function works more like a mute. When you “block” someone, you’re just muting their interactions so you don’t see the harassment. But it doesn’t actually stop them from harassing you. It just ensures you can’t see it to stay on top of it. To use the earlier stalker example, what if they’re amping up their stalking and have started doxxing you, and you’re completely oblivious because you’re not seeing their responses to your posts?

      • The D Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        most other fediverse softwares have blocks run two ways to reduce risk of harm via stalking, brigading, and dogpiling. there’s a difference between muting someone and blocking them on things like mastodon. on lemmy blocks are equivalent to mutes on mastodon

    • Eldritch@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s one thing when some random unknown person does it with their own personal communities. It’s a bit different when it’s an instance administrator. I think you will at least acknowledge that.

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        They won’t acknowledge shit.

        Edit: using gender neutral terms when you don’t know the person’s gender isn’t misgendering, it’s common sense and respectful. Going back to my original words. If she has a problem with it, she can get on her real account.

        Hi Hexbear! You’re so mad at me documenting the actions of users and alt accounts. I’m sure that’s not related to the fact I pinged the account at all.

        Is it really “kicking someone off” when she herself admitted that she doesn’t use this site anymore? Sorry I called out someone’s bad faith actions. I’ll make sure to do it next time on a new alt, like y’all do.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Is… is there a rule anywhere that says thats how the comm operates?

      Or are we just all supposed to assume potentially any comm is run by the invisible and artibrary whims and unstated rulesets of mods?

      They’re not… I don’t think they are upset they cannot participate in a comm they did not participate in. That’s not the point.

      The point is the the princple, or lack thereof.

      If you want to have an instance wide rule that actually codifies, in some way, the ability of admins/powermods to ban anyone, from anywhere, for any reason… then that would be shitty, but at least openly and transparently shitty.

      Then at least Dictatorship of the Daveletariat would at least be, you know, explicitly stated policy?

      … does such a public facing rule or ruleset already exist, and I just missed it?

      • SoftQuartz [She/Her]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I was just pointing out that there are multiple communities on the threadiverse that do the same thing, including some hosted on this very instance! A community moderator’s job is to grow a community and if a person isn’t a right fit for the community why would a moderator want to keep them around, especially if they are disruptive to the community

        • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Ok, so they deserve being banned for … breaking an undefined rule.

          That’s your position?

          EDIT: the whole problem here is this person got banned from a comm they’d never been to… for spamming.

          That doesn’t make sense.

          You saying them being banned from a comm they’d never been to… for disrupting that comm… also does not make any sense.

          The other element of this problem is powermods (by which I mean people who mod multiple comms) and admins banning people from one place for infractions committed in another, and then potentially daisy chaining through private convos between mods… when said banned person isn’t really clearly violating stated rules that have that stated penalty outcome.

          That is exactly the kind of hivemind/culty bullshit that is what people hate about reddit, that there’s basically just a cool kids club that doesn’t actually follow any rules with any consistency, and just acts as a kind of Mean Girls squad, exiling and censoring people … basically for annoying them or making fools of them.

          Its middle school mentality. Vibes based moderation. Censorship by popularity contest, where only the cool kids get to vote on that.

          • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            That is exactly the kind of hivemind/culty bullshit that is what people hate about reddit, that there’s basically just a cool kids club that doesn’t actually follow any rules with any consistency, and just acts as a kind of Mean Girls squad, exiling and censoring people … basically for annoying them or making fools of them.

            Its middle school mentality. Vibes based moderation. Censorship by popularity contest, where only the cool kids get to vote on that.

            You could easily be referring to all the people raging about ‘the tankie triad’ with this.

            The vast majority of the time I look at someone complaining about getting censored on .ml they were either being bigoted or insulting people.

            As for vibes based moderation and censoring people for actions in other places, I got banned from quokk.au by their admin for ‘brigading’ because I cross-linked to a db0 thread complaining about the OPs mod actions. ‘brigading’ is nowhere in the site rules for quokk.au as far as I’m aware. I am also the only person to have ever been banned by quokk.au in this way so far.

            I was banned for ‘homophobia’ by OP because I complained about his post having a misogynistic title.

            You are literally the one defending a powermod who bans people in retaliation, because they got banned from one comm that they clearly despise for being a toxic asshole.

          • SoftQuartz [She/Her]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            My position is that if you don’t like a community then you should not go there to be disruptive. When someone continues to disrupt a community that they dislike it is within the moderators duties to stop that. I support the moderators on divisionbyzero who use that to curate positive communities, just the other day another moderator made a now locked post saying they do the exact same thing complained about by the OP. I also have a reply from Diva saying that the OP has done this same action so I stand by my PTB statement.

            • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              3 months ago

              Ok so you’re missing the entire basis point of why this is absurd.

              They got banned from a comm they’d never been to, never posted in… because they were apparently ‘spamming’.

              You… can’t have spammed a community that you’ve never made a post or comment in.

              … Also, you say you stand by your PTB statement?

              Your original statement, the inciting thing for this whole comment chain… is you issuing a YDI verdict.

              Not a PTB verdict.

              Those two are basically total opposites.

              … Are you confused?

              Like, just generally?

              • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Ok so you’re missing the entire basis point of why this is absurd.

                a basis point is a finance unit for 1/100th of a percent, you could just drop the ‘basis’ and your sentence would make sense.

                really funny that you started your whole diatribe about her being confused by botching your own word usage. congratulations

                I don’t really care about butchering the english language, so don’t come at me. usually I treat it with the respect it deserves, which is none. the irony, however, was excellent

                I got banned from 27 communities on quokk.au for something which is not in their rules, because they were simply justifying retaliation against me for calling the OP out.

                I don’t think this is a principled complaint that you have.

                • Grainne@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Stop acting like you’re innocent.

                  They banned you for brigading after you posted links on hexbear directing users to a post you had made about OP.

    • The D Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      i’ve been actively avoiding hexbear but i had nothing to do but laugh looking at their slop community misrepresenting an anarchist saying that anarchists don’t just engage in critical class analysis but in other forms of hierarchical exploitation. like. the context was so completely obviously saying that anarchists engage in multiple forms of anti-authoritarianism, and class is one of them

      i guess marxist can only be marxist? they can’t ever apply critical analysis to anything else?

        • The D Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          i don’t know what you mean. anarchism is an extremely leftist position and the poster in question wasn’t on hexbear. the post that made it onto hexbear was a marxist-leninist effectively ignoring what the anarchist was saying critical analysis means to anarchists.