US forces have seized an oil tanker off the coast of Venezuela, in a major escalation of Donald Trump’s four-month pressure campaign against the South American country’s dictator, Nicolás Maduro.

  • Mk23simp
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    209
    ·
    2 months ago

    Huh, I wonder why they seized it instead of shooting it like the others? It couldn’t possibly be for the oil, right?

  • SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    173
    ·
    2 months ago

    Starting a nonsense war under the guise of “spreading democracy” just to take their oil reserves so that rednecks back home can pollute the air and warm the earth with their oversized trucks. Can it get any more American this?

  • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    ·
    2 months ago

    Let me guess… It was carrying drugs? Just packed full of cocaine? Can’t wait to hear the justification for this one.

        • FatVegan@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          He reminds me so much of my little nephew sometimes. He’s obsessed with trophies and medals. When we’re in a store where they sell trophies, he asks me if they are “real” and i try to explain to him that trophies aren’t “real” they are just a symbol. Sometimes for nothing. And he tries to understand. And then when i ask him if i should buy him a meaningless trophy, he goes yes pleeeease, a big one.

  • Arancello@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    2 months ago

    Welcome to the sixteenth century! When Queen Elizabeth couldn’t afford to go to war against Spain so created ‘letters of marque’ which legalised piracy against Spain and its empire. Single handedly created the pirate economy.

    Then, welcome to the eighteenth century, when america created the fiction of the Barbary Corsairs to legalise american piracy of the atlantic trade.

    Isnt it Mark Twain who states that history rhymes?

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      2 months ago

      Vietnam lost over a million of its people during the US invasion and occupation. It’s all cutesy and smug to tally this as a Big L for Team USA. But I don’t think anyone in that country values the W/L record over the hundreds of thousands of family members, friends, and other loved ones who died to feed the American war machine’s rapacious appetite.

      That’s before we even talk about the ecological damage that haunts Vietnam to this day. Or the deaths in Laos and Cambodia racked up in collateral. Or the tenuous diplomatic relationships between the various South Pacific neighbors based on Cold War grudges, which have re-emerged as a shooting war between Thailand and Cambodia just last month.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          2 months ago

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenix_Program#Torture

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Lai_massacre#Killings

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_Orange#Use_in_the_Vietnam_War

          Read through that and tell me what we missed.

          The American military tried everything just shy of nuking Hanoi. Anyone who tells you otherwise is ignorant or trying to sell you something.

          Soviet-sponsored air and naval defenses prevent North Vietnam from being saturation bombarded at the scale we inflicted on North Korea a decade earlier. Americans were largely confined to combat against insurgencies in the South. So much of the war was fought against the civilian population that the Americans were ostensibly there to protect from the villainous Communists.

          But the idea that we simply didn’t use enough troops or sufficiently advanced weaponry or brutal tactics… that’s all reactionary mythology. If skinning half the population alive would have won the war, we’d have done it. A far more compelling argument is that Americans alienated the entire peninsula with our “all out” invasion (not unlike how we ended up alienating the bulk of the Afghan population following our '02 invasion). A subtler and more strategic approach - like our efforts to stand up anti-communist governments in The Philippines and Indonesia - seemed to have far better results in hindsight.

          • dellish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            Are we talking about the same Indonesia where the USA funded and installed a Pro-US puppet government who basically sold out the country to US property development?

            I guess that’s better than the country being torn apart by war, but it got torn apart none-the-less.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              Are we talking about the same Indonesia where the USA funded and installed a Pro-US puppet government who basically sold out the country to US property development?

              The Very Same!

              I guess that’s better than the country being torn apart by war, but it got torn apart none-the-less.

              It is nearly non-existent in US History textbooks, which is a big fat “W” from the perspective of the capitalist-friendly intelligence services.

    • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 months ago

      Actually the US has a shockingly short list of wars they have outright won where they were NOT part of an international coalition.

  • itisileclerk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    2 months ago

    USA turns into Taliban country. Taliban originaly is “political and militant organization with an ideology comprising elements of the Deobandi movement of Islamic fundamentalism and Pashtun nationalism”, now is just “political and militant organization with an ideology comprising elements of the MAGA movement of Evangelical fundamentalism and WASP nationalism”

    • Digit@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      Taliban

      Remember when the CIA funded and armed what became the Taliban?

      Remember when the CIA had their guy running the Taliban?

        • Digit@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oh, maybe I’m conflating the Taliban with Al-Qaeda a bit (and [for the next part of this] maybe even ISIS too a bit? idk) ~ I’m no Whitney Webb for this stuff, so do use several websearch engines likely to be honest about this stuff for yourself, but…

          Tim Osman? (Whom you may know by another name.)

          Then after that there was that guy they once called a terrorist, then put a suit on and invited to the white house… I’m terrible with names… was it… Ahmed al-Sharaa/Abu Mohammad al-Julani?

          Hard to keep track if not paying close attention.

          Hard to keep paying close attention after seeing the same old ploys and fakery played out over and over.

          “Pick up the gun”

          “You all saw him. He had a gun.”

  • Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 months ago

    Well at least we know the real reason for the murders now. Why it it always the most greedy, predictable cause?

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 months ago

      Dude has been saying for 20 years that we should’ve stolen Iraq’s oil. Yet somehow everyone acts surprised when he does pretty predictable things like this.