

- cross-posted to:
- politicalmemes@lemmy.world
- communism@lemmy.ml




cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/23431138
Crossposted from https://lemmy.world/post/40642280
all […] religions
dunno about that one rads. Some religions are more genocidal than others.
Religion isn’t genocidal, people who intend to commit genocide use religion, they also use science and sophistery and whatever else they can use to manipulate people towards their cause.
Blaming religion, like blaming any ideas, is idealist nonsense.
wait, what is your definition of religion?
Like I am pretty sure Zionists claim Israel is solely theirs, and they are succeeding in their claim.
I have faith some ideas praxied are more genocidal than others, if I am contextualizing your definition from your reply correctly.
You can find voices within any religion to justify anything. The ones who are amplified are the ones who benefit existing power structures.
Meanwhile groups like Jewish Voice for Peace use their religion to justify antizionism.
So are you for or against stochastic genocide?
Are you saying genocide is inherent to Judaism? Because thats antisemitic af.
Negative. I am trying to comprehend at what point do you believe ideasreligions are stochastic or hearsays.
In Zionism, as praxied, it’s genocide.
In Buddhism, as stochastic, is it genocide?
You’re operating off an idealist perspective; as if theres some platonic idea of each religion, instead of understanding religious practice within the context of society.
Remove the tankie watermark and this is pretty good
It’s absolutely not owned by Tankies. It’s been used for communism before the USSR. It represents unity in workers.
I have no dog in this fight but it raises an interesting thought about certain other symbols that have been tainted by authoritarian governments
Devil’s Advocate here: the Swastika also had a different meaning before being taken over by Nazis. I’m not necessarily saying that the hammer and sickle means one thing or another, but after the USSR used it people (mainly non-communists) see it in a very specific light. Once people correlate a symbol with a certain movement or point of view, it will be difficult to change that. A large part of the Pagan community is still fighting to take back smaller and lesser known symbols that have been used by the Nazi party, but the “big one” is lost forever.
The Buddhist swastika is still used to denote temples across Asia. It depends on the context.
people (mainly non-communists) see it in a very specific light
Anticommunists who would label anything left of liberalism communism see it in that light. They label any symbol you use that way, they don’t actually care about any association with the claimed evils, its just a pretense to oppose the left.
Look at the way the US’s left fell over itself to decry the evils of communism over the last century and even the most tepid social democrat gets labeled communist today.
I’m sure that within those regions and communities, the use of that version of the sunwheel has a strong, long-standing association with Buddhism. Unfortunately the rest of the world did not, and most of us will instantly associate it with Nazi history. Some of us know about the Buddhist history of the symbol, but I’m not gonna be the one to wear a swastika and explain how it’s not a Nazi symbol to every person that I see.
I know that the symbol has a historical meaning, and in Europe it was used as a sunwheel. I know that the Hammer and Sickle is a symbol of the working class. The problem is the propaganda against the Hammer and Sickle as a symbol of the people.
TLDR: propaganda and history has changed the meaning of these symbols to the view of the average person.
No, it represents oppression, suffering, imperialism, torture, famine, etc.
Because those are the contexts it’s been proudly sported. For half of the Europe, it’s as bad as a swastika. And it’s use is often forbidden by law outside historical contexts.
tecnically, that’s just the symbol for communism, which doesn’t need to be authoritarian. ancoms, for example.