“It didn’t go unnoticed in Frankfurt that Visa and Mastercard suspended operations in Russia in March 2022 after the invasion of Ukraine……Thirteen of the 20 countries in the euro have no domestic card scheme. You use an international operator, or you pay in cash.”

It hasn’t gone unnoticed that the US is threatening to invade an EU country’s (Denmark) territory, either. Would a future President Trump or President Vance threaten to shut down European financial infrastructure if it opposes an annexation of Greenland? Who knows, but better to take away that opportunity for leverage.

The plan is that you can link it to your bank account or open a special account at post offices throughout the EU. There will be phone apps for payments and digital Euro debit cards. Visa/Mastercard & Apple/Google Pay typically charge 3% fees; the digital Euro will have none. That will ensure it is speedily adopted by retailers and quickly supplants the US providers. Also worth noting its technology will be 100% European only, leaving zero vulnerability/leverage to non-Europeans.

Digital euro: what it is and how we will use the new form of cash - The European Central Bank is determined to break the US grip on card payments

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      1 month ago

      I mean, it’s gonna ultimately have to work everywhere

      People don’t like having cards they can’t use when they travel

      It’s not gonna happen right away, but I don’t see how it doesn’t end up that way

      Edit: although reading more it might not be equivalent to the existing kinds of cards as it seems to be a debit only provision (i.e. potentially lacking a lot of the protection you get from using a credit card as your main purchasing card). Will be interesting to see how this evolves

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        1 month ago

        A lot of people don’t even own credit cards here, so that isn’t really a massive problem.

      • kunaltyagi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 month ago

        A credit card that only works domestically is not a deal breaker. Most of the time, people don’t travel abroad. So, using a more advantageous card (more perks, less fees, etc.) domestically makes sense.

        Domestic providers are a thing in several countries which are smaller than EU. Some of them don’t operate internationally so this news isn’t that weird

      • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s a public service for people in the EU and businesses operating in the EU paid for by EU taxpayers. So I doubt it will be rolled out outside of the EU. It still cost money to operate the service eventhough it is provided for free. If it ever gets to work outside the EU it will probably only be for people that have EU residency. No way they want to subsidize the transactions for people from outside of the EU with EU tax money.

    • Caveman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I mean, you absolutely could make a till but you still have to hook it up to a payment provider like Adyen, Stripe or a terminal that handles the payment.

  • elgordino@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    1 month ago

    Visa/Mastercard & Apple/Google Pay typically charge 3% fees

    Not in the EU. Visa and Mastercard have been capped to 0.5% for years.

    Apple / Google pay take a small cut from the 0.5%

    Diversity in payment methods would be no bad thing though. It’s amazing how Visa/Mastercard have managed to insert themselves into almost ever transaction, particularly since contactless became so prevalent.

      • grandma@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        I am completely uninformed on card payment fees but l imagine some if this is because it’s easier to underreport cash revenue to tax authorities

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        The merchant will often take a larger amount. For example Square charge 1.75% fees.

        The 0.5% is the bit that goes to Mastercard/Visa iirc.

        It’s never an enormous amount, and if they don’t have to let Mr Tax Man know then some small businesses won’t.

  • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 month ago

    I hope Americans are allowed to use it. I want to support hentai and to enjoy it without prudes getting in the way.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      It comes to America
      A bunch of Americans start using it
      The provider sees a growing market and likes money.
      Some pastor from Iowa sees tits on the Internet and gets offended.
      Religious network of nutnobs pays for boycott ad campaign.
      Provider silently or not so silently bans everything that can possibly offend christian pastors from the US.
      We still need a sane payment provider

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        Boycotting a service that has no fees doesn’t do much.

        It reminds me of when I worked in a call center. Asshole, screaming callers would demand to speak to someone else and expect me to be somehow upset that I got to get them off my line.

        • Nalivai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          They still benefit from having volumes of money flowing through them, or at least can bendfit if we allow them to be a for profit business.

        • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          right? like oh you don’t want to use this service that only costs us money? so sad… NEXT!

      • Nikelui@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Pastors from Iowa and like-minded censorship lovers from the US are probably not the target customers, so I doubt the efficacy of an eventual boycott.

          • Nikelui@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            Steam was pressured by the payment processors, this is supposed to be a solution to the censorship due to the Visa / Mastercard monopoly.

            • Jhex@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              yes but the point OP is making is that, if it comes to America, this third payment processor will be corrupted by making more money and wind up in the same boat as MC and Visa

      • faintwhenfree@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 month ago

        Sorry to be an ass and english is a weird language but it’s spelled as unifier, unify doesn’t become unifyer. Why? Because it’s a piece of shit language that’s why.

        • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 month ago

          Unifyer: Portmanteau of Groyper and Unifier. Invented at the end of 2025 CE, it came to represent the abhorrent character of Fascist leaders like Donald Trump uniting opposing political powers that would normally bicker.

          • The Devil’s Dictionary, the most honest provider of words among the literary arts.
            • SkyeStarfall
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 month ago

              Eh, it pretty much is. Language is fluid and constantly changing, there isn’t really anything “right” or “wrong”. What’s “correct” in a language is essentially what people speak and write

              Sure, you have dictionaries and grammar rules and such, but they’re not prescriptive, they’re descriptive

              • nomy@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 month ago

                there isn’t really anything “right” or “wrong”.

                I’m familiar with the argument but I disagree with it. Every person learning a language disagrees with it. And every instructor I’ve had disagrees with it. The only people who seem to agree are the same people who misuse the language.

                • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Do you always use literally literally, and are you careful not to talk about the enormity of perfectly innocent large things?

                  Language changes. People make mistakes. Neither is worth getting too upset about.

                • SkyeStarfall
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  That’s a very strong use of “every”. English isn’t my primarily language either, you know

                  And no, in fact, I’ve heard most people who have a degree en english, linguistics, whatever, to disagree with your position. Language is how it’s used, not what it’s supposed to be. Otherwise we would always have had one singular language, forever, and no dialects either

                • SkyeStarfall
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Depends on your definition, but so long as it’s understandable, yeah

                  I mean, what are dialects, for example?

        • nimpnin@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’ll be the enlightened centrist here: yes, let’s all try to spell words correctly, and no, do not unpromptedly correct other people’s spelling if you understood what they meant

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 month ago

      The US-based financial sector fights it tooth-and-claw at every opportunity. I suspect this kind of legislation is an absolute cash-cow for lobbyists across the continent, in the same way the PPACA made a bunch of influential DC firms incredibly rich.

      But can the ECB actually deliver on a useful and efficient method of continent-wide banking in practice? Fingers crossed, I guess. I just wouldn’t hold my breath.

  • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’ll be interesting to see how they’ll handle steamy steam games. The whole steam and itch deplatforming saga was kicked off by Visa, Mastercard and Paypal.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 month ago

      Won’t have any effect as long as they need to have Visa and Mastercard for other territories. In Europe you can already pay with European payment systems on Steam like iDeal (Dutch) and Trustly (Swedish) and those porn games still got removed in the territories that have those payment options.

    • Dagnet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Brazil has PIX and steam accepts it, no problems. (pix is a government created payment method that has 0 fees and is basically instant, you never wait for confirmation)

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Considering the push for stuff like chat control and the increasingly global lock down on “obscenity”:

      They’ll handle it according to plan.

      Like, good. Hurt the US’s soft power. But people really should be looking even a foot in front of their faces on this.

    • phx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      That was my first thought. I like every part of the article except the “European only” bit

      • MisterD@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Canada is supposedly in talks with the EU for some kind of association so we might get it too

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    Wow, very cool! Absolute poggers.

    “It’s an end-to-European solution,” says Alessandro Giovannini, an ECB official. “All the engineering will be 100pc European, and it will be distributed by euro banks.”

    Hmm, I should open a European bank account. It could help if I’m every visiting family out there, anyway.

    • Derpgon@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Revolut should work, ask around friends because they give about 80$ bonus if you sign up via referral (to the person you referred, after 3 payments IIRC, but they can send half to you, or all of it).

    • Damage@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      Downloading a standalone digital-euro app on your phone will be another option. Or using a special digital-euro card, which the ECB will also issue.

      Read the article before spreading disinformation.

      • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Read the article before spreading disinformation.

        I don’t think you know how a “digital-euro card” is going to be implemented. Are you really so naive to believe it will work without a non-free application running from either your phone or your computer?

        • Damage@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          I don’t think you know how a “digital-euro card” is going to be implemented.

          And you do?

      • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s not an improvement. An improvement would be to offer EU-wide exactly what iDEAL was in the Netherlands. There was no need to change anything about the iDEAL system, no need for an extra app, no need for another card, just your regular bank account and any web browser + whatever transaction number solution you had.

        This proposal is not an improvement, it’s another step into a totalitarian regime where every single transaction is tracked by the war criminal and pedo-criminal monsters in our governments.

        • Randelung@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          The wallet is supposed to be tracking free and offline, without an account at a bank. That’s an improvement.

            • Randelung@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Yes, and cash online is famously difficult.
              If you don’t want to lose the digital cash, use the anonymous card they propose.

    • starchylemming@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      lmao back to square one with extra steps ?

      well its still a win if visa and mastercard lose just a little money

      • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        From the article:

        “We have to see off the naysayers who tell people this is about government control, or monitoring, or trying to replace cash,” says Regina Doherty. “None of these things are true. We have to prove that to people.”

        This lady is either completely shameless in lying to people’s faces, or she is very, very stupid.

    • RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Seems everything these days are tied to a phone. Even when there is no need for it or convenient.The day we loose wide access to smartphones, society is fucked.

      • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The day we loose wide access to smartphones, society is fucked.

        If that ever happened, I think the opposite would be true. We would have a chance to heal, and all those morons thriving on mobile applications would hopefully go bankrupt and become meaningless.

  • Randelung@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 month ago

    Holy shit, this is exactly what I was talking to my parents about over Christmas. A wallet in your phone, money lost when stolen, no tracking. This is potentially big.

    • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s not what this is. It’s not a digital wallet: it’s a transfer method. It’s essentially the direct equivalent of the virtual debit cards most banks are offering these days.

      • Randelung@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s a wallet, it literally said so in the article. A proposed max of 3000 Euros, with the explicit drawback of losing the money when you lose the phone.

        • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          That’s for people who for whatever reason don’t use a bank. If you have a bank, it’s with your bank.

    • RobotsLeftHand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      The article explicitly states that that might be one option, to have a separate, offline fund that is tied directly to the phone, but it isn’t the default and, again, optional. It would help during outages and also have a privacy element for those concerned.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      But I don’t want my money to be lost when stolen. If I wanted that, I’d carry cash.

  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    I cannot wait for this to come to fruition. Let’s hope that it isn’t a privacy cess pit though.

    • BoycottTwitter@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      This article claims there are very initial signs that you might get your wish: https://inews.co.uk/opinion/process-trying-undo-brexit-begun-4106581

      I personally can’t get over the fact that a 50% majority was all that was needed for such a drastic change. The US despite all its flaws requires more than 50% for certain major things like amending the constitution. Hopefully you can one day rejoin and then make it so it would require a higher threshold like 2/3 majority before another brexit would be possible.

      • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Thank you.

        The UK has more of a set of conventions and principles than a constitution. We found out how weak that is when Boris Johnson broke the rules of Parliament to avoid losing a vote on Brexit, and made the Queen lie about it publicly in the formal announcement of the proroguement.

        One of the principles is that no Parliament can bind its successor. For example, there was a fixed term parliaments law from 2010 or so that said that you need a two thirds majority to call an election before five years is up (rather than at whatever time suits the incumbent prime minister); when a new Parliament was elected in 2015, one of the first things they did was rescind that law, with a simple majority.

        I worry that Farage, friend to trump and follower of Bannon, will become prime minister and lead us to such destruction that we will write an actual constitution, but that didn’t do America any good once the supreme court was stuffed with Republicans loyal to trump.

        I think the trick is to not elect tyrants, but Putin’s propaganda reaches worldwide and the far right is rising everywhere. Perhaps it really will be global thermonuclear war this time.

  • skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve noticed a few retailers in Canada charging more for credit cards - debit, cash and cheque are all no extra fee’s. The only reason I have a credit card is for the rewards and the necessity for things like hotels and car rentals.

    If society could work in our favor and not try to force easy credit on us then we would all be better off.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      The CC merchant agreements used to prohibit charging the customer for the charges.

      Friend of mine that worked at a bank had a furniture store try to do that, she got hold of some muckity-muck at the CC company while the salesperson watched (after warning them that this wasn’t how any of that worked), the furniture store had their credit card machines suspended before she left the building. There was copious wailing and gnashing of teeth that she watched with a smile. She refused their offers of a heavy discount to make a phone call again and walked out.

      They removed that part a couple years ago from many of the merchant agreements.