• Kayday@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    I read that it’s largely due to established precedent that in cases where a police officer shoots a driver, (happens enough for there to be precedent) the burden of proof is to show beyond a reasonable doubt that the killer did not have cause to fear for their life. Proving something to not be the case is very difficult.

    • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 months ago

      Lucky for us we have the whole thing from multiple angles, including the murderers POV because he whipped out his phone because he wanted a video of the murder that he premeditated.

      It’s a high bar, but this is one of the most documented murders in history.

    • null@piefed.nullspace.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t think thats true.

      He violated official policy, and it’s obvious to anyone with half a brain that forcing a driver to slam on the accelerator (due to being dead) can only make the situation worse.

      I don’t think he’ll face charges, but I’m wary of what you remember reading somewhere.

      • ToastedRavioli@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        He literally had gotten video of her license plate prior to shooting her. He had no need to put himself in front of her car while other officers were screaming at her to drive away. They could have gone after her later, as is typically done with anyone not considered seriously dangerous that is operating a vehicle, but he chose to get in front of her and start shooting when she complied with the order to drive away