With a lot of talk from governments around the world trying to either ban or restrict VPNs, I’m curious to know what are our options if they follow through? I know we can use the Tor network, but is there other options? I assume we could self-host our VPN since I don’t think it would be affected by a possible ban. Is there a less tech-savvy option I’m not aware of? I’m just trying to understand all of my options just in case a ban does happen.

  • danh2os@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s all talk. VPN is a critical business security feature. Corporate security would be at risk. Ignore this crap.

    • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      It would be fairly trivial to allow VPNs for businesses and government institutions, but ban them for regular users.

      • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        Hahaha, really? How, pray tell?

        VPN can be run (and is run) such that it can’t be detected (more accurately, is incredibly difficult to detect).

        • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Maybe it’s possible, but it’s a much bigger barrier to entry than it is currently, and it being illegal does have consequences when the cops search your devices.

          Plus e.g. the UK is planning to mandate preinstalled government spyware on phones and AFAIK China already implemented that years ago.

    • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Government security would be too. They would undoubtedly give themselves an exception, but it shows how little the people suggesting it understands how the modern world operates

  • _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 days ago

    The effectively can’t ban VPNs and even if such an absolutely ludicrous law were to be passed, VPN traffic can still be hidden to appear as normal traffic. It’s all bullshit bluster from idiots who have no understanding of how technology works at all. VPNs are absolutely vital to the function of businesses and institutions, banning them would be an absolute disaster for everyone but criminals who make money from stealing data and maybe dictators (though they’d still be screwing themselves over in the long run).

  • golden_zealot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    Socks5 proxying and an international friend group you trust and who trust you with each others internet connections perhaps.

    • ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 days ago

      Also worth noting that traffic obfuscation would become much more important, as a crackdown on VPNs would likely also be accompanied by a crackdown on privacy-oriented tools

  • Inucune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    Businesses use VPNs to secure traffic. I doubt they will just drop them when the risks are assessed.

    • lost_faith@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      Rules for thee. I really do not think a ban on vpns would affect business at all, it would be focused on the general population as we do not deserve privacy where the businesses do.

  • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    The question is kinda “for what purpose”. VPNs are great for accessing content on mainstream websites that are restricted in your country, more niche solutions like self-hosting your own VPN, Tor or I2P don’t really work for that. I suspect those kinds of solutions are more useful for securing your own network, communication with other privacy enthusiasts or piracy.

    • eleitl@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      VPN prevents your ISP/your nation-state from monitoring and/or tampering with your traffic.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    My best guess is to yell at people while hidden behind a car so they can’t see you, then run away.

  • eleijeep@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yeah let’s write down all the available options here before they write the legislation so they have a nice easy reference for how to write the law so it squashes all the workarounds.

    • golden_zealot@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      What is your implication here?

      That no has ever or will ever discuss VPN alternatives outside of this +30 vote thread on lemmy.ca and that the governments of the world will reference this thread to go about determining what to outlaw?

      I’m sorry to tell you, but every single one of these governments is already in some regard aware of everything in this thread and beyond by virtue of it already being public information - and if they weren’t aware of this stuff, don’t you think they would for example, just pay someone to tell them?

      They know Tor exists, they know I2P exists, they know Socks5 Proxies exist, they know meshtastic exists, they know freenet exists, they know Yggdrasil exists, they know mail exists, they know sharing the password to an email account so that people can read each others saved drafts exists, they know carrier pigeons exist, they know SSL/TLS exists, they know telnet exists, they know ssh exists, they know IRC exists, they know matrix chat exists, they know signal exists, they know simplexx exists, they know telegram exists, they know dead drops exists, etc.

      You also realize that if they wanted to cover all of their bases they don’t even have to go that far? They could just pass a law stating “Any product or technology which hides internet bound network traffic from your ISP is now illegal”? They could even say “Attempting to keep any information private from a government entity is illegal”.

      Like unless you secretly wrote your own communications protocol and then never shared it (which kind of defeats the purpose), then if you have access to the knowledge of the protocol existing, so does any government (at least in the case of any widely used communications technology).