• T156@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 days ago

    Although they’re falling out of use these days, both because they’re not very environmentally friendly on account of being instant bird death-rays, and also because regular solar panels are cheap enough that it’s not worth it to make a big thermosolar plant.

    • A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      Idk, my country just inaugurated a gigantic one of these.

      Also, fotovoltaic pannels decay with time and have to be replaced, 15 years I think? Their manufacturing isn’t also the greenest thing on earth.

      You build one of these, and you can run it for a long long time.

      • drosophila
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        5 days ago

        15 years I think

        This number gets lower every time I see it.

        First, manufacturers typically guarantee their panels for 25 to 30 years.

        Second, while we can extrapolate from existing data and perform accelerated aging tests, we’re actually not completely sure how long PV panels last in the real world because the oldest ones from 1987 are still going.

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        The usual warranty period is 20 years generating 80% of the nameplate generating Watts

        They keep generating reasonable amounts of power 50 or 100 years later, though they tend to get overtaken by new technology in 10 to 20 years, and since they pay for themselves in about 4 years in my area they get replaced while still working well

        I think we export our obsolete panels to developing nations

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Solar panels are still cheaper and easier. Most spaceships and probes rely on them.

      • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Not a lot of atmosphere on the moon.

        Transmitting heat across distances in effectively a vacuum doesn’t work too well.

        Just look a the size of the radiators the ISS has to have, and they’re not even sending heat anywhere in particular, that’s just getting it off station

        • Doxin@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          You’re getting thermal radiation and convection confused. The ISS has giant radiators because it’s a right pain in the ass to turn heat into thermal radiation, and it cannot rely on convection to cool things like you can here on earth. Turning thermal radiation into heat on the other hand is pretty trivial. Just don’t reflect it and it’ll turn into heat. These things aren’t transporting heat across distances. They are transporting thermal radiation across distances. That works as well in a vacuum – if not better – as it does on earth.

          If thermal radiation doesn’t work in a vacuum, how is the sun heating anything up?

        • A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Or in the Atacama, the Desertiest desert on earth!

          Where the gigantic Cerro Dominador Termosolar Power Plant opened a couple years ago.

        • Riverside@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          The mirrors on Earth don’t transfer the energy using the air between the mirror and the collector, they just bounce the spicy photons which can travel even better in a vacuum.