• zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    2 months ago

    Roughly 20 something times your annual expenses.

    There is a whole movement on the Internet called FIRE (financial independence, retire early) if you want to go down that rabbit hole

  • Whiskey_iicarus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    Your question is too vague. It all depends on what you consider an acceptable lifestyle and also what area of the world plays a huge part.

  • karpintero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    As others have mentioned, the common guidance is to figure out your annual expenses, i.e how much you need to live off of, and divide that by safe withdrawal rate (typically ~4% based on the Trinity study) to come up with a total amount needed to retire early. So for example, if you determine you need $60k/year, the formula would suggest saving $1.5M (60,000 ÷ 0.04 = 1.5M).

    The basic idea is save a big enough nest egg so that you can live solely off interest, meaning you never touch the principal and your account grows in perpetuity.

    The hard part is two-fold IMO:

    1. Estimating your average annual expenses is difficult due to lots of variables, e.g.
    • Health care costs vary greatly (if you don’t have access to public healthcare depending on your country) and tend to increase with age

    • Housing costs are situational and can either decrease (if you own your own home and payoff your mortgage) or increase if you rent or have to move/refinance/etc.

    • Your family size may change. Kids can greatly throw off projections. Taking care of elderly parents. Having a partner start or stop working. All these things can impact your assumptions. Therefore, it’s usually good to add some buffer.

    • Inflation should also be accounted for. This can be difficult to project for the remainder of your life, so some tend to just look at historical inflation, but there’s no guarantee the future will follow the same trend. Same for lifestyle creep, but that’s (usually) more controllable.

    1. How to choose what investments will allow you to earn a return in excess of your withdrawal rate. For example, if you’re withdrawing 4%, you need your investments to earn a higher rate than that to avoid having to dip into your principal.
    • The common guidance (from say Buffet, Bolgeheads, etc.) for most people is to invest in low-cost index funds (availability depends on your country). I emphasize “low-cost” because there was another study that showed the only sure-fire predictor of alpha (performance above a certain benchmark, like the S&P 500 if you’re in the US) is the having low management fees. Historically, this should return anywhere from 5-10% but again past performance is not indicative of future returns.

    • While you’re young and have more time in the market, you genreally want to invest in higher risk/higher reward type investments. Idea being you benefit from higher returns while having more time to weather downturns. Then as you age, you can shift towards lower risk/lower reward investments, like bonds, so you’re not as exposed to market fluctuations.

    One last thought, there are also variations of FIRE, like Barista FiRE, Coast FIRE, where you don’t have to completely stop working but are financially independent so you can choose where/how hard to work.

    Good luck,

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Onless you will die in a few years growth should be where most of your retire early money comes from. As you get older you need less growth though.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    You could make an argument that’s a big gamble if you’re expecting to use up the principal at all. So, 10x what you use in a typical year would be an absolute minimum, and that would involve an aggressive portfolio that you run down when the market is bad and earn back later. 20x or 30x would be more comfortable, especially if there’s a chance you’re going to spend more than you did when working.

    A bit of a hack people do make work is moving to a poor country where costs of living are lower. Then the question is how much lower can you actually get it, which is both about your personality and interests and how poor a place you’re willing to consider. Obviously, you can make $2 a day work, if you eat only corn and squat all day under a piece of aluminum. On the other hand, if you want to live the exact same way as at home down to brands, far afield can end up more expensive.

  • Berttheduck@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    It really depends on the lifestyle you want and what “retirement” means to you. Do you want to never work again or work part time? So you want to live in a home with no mortgage and minimal bills or travel the world for 6 months of every year. Your best bet is to talk to a financial advisor.

    • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      A financial advisor you pay is working for you

      One who is “free” is a salesperson.

      There’s good and bad advisors on both sides, but it’s important to know. There’s people out there paying over 5% management fees.

  • Perspectivist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    One million invested to the stock market gives you roughly 70k 40k returns yearly and you get to keep the million.

  • Nachtara@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Use your favorite search engine to look for the trinity study and safe withdrawal rates. as a rough number: your yearly spending x 24.

  • dan1101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    All depends on how long you’ll live, your health, and your lifestyle. Big big variables.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Generally it never was.

      (Or even late or never, globally. The ancient system involves your kids paying for your way)

  • Hapankaali@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Depending on where you intend to retire and your intended expenses during retirement, anywhere from 0 to billions.