Only catch, you can’t use your wealth to fix th system, donate it or give it away. It’d only be for yourself.

    • LadyMeow
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      26 days ago

      Yeah, that was my second thought after ‘hell yeah, I’d have the means to maybe make a big difference!’ But the rules don’t allow that. :( so same as now, only rich af then

      • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        26 days ago

        We can’t use our hundreds of millions to fix the system, but we can use them to create a new competing system founded on the principles of mutual aid. I’m gonna do that.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        26 days ago

        Who knows.
        Maybe all the current rich people already got this deal.
        So if they can’t impeove anything, why not improve their own situation? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    • ramble81@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      27 days ago

      Sadly aren’t most of us. I’m curious if people would rather be rich and burdened, or poor and blissfully unaware.

      • femtek
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        27 days ago

        Rich and can do something about it with the money and power it brings.

  • gustofwind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    27 days ago

    Sounds like a consequence free hundred million dollars since you should already be acutely informed as to the horrible happenings of the world

      • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        27 days ago

        There is no true “ignorant but happy” in this scenario because your life is still affected by society and the world even if you aren’t aware of it directly.

      • gustofwind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        27 days ago

        I can go buy myself plenty of happiness and it’s not like being ignorant automatically means you’re gonna be happy

        Being ignorant won’t protect you from the world knocking on your door and tossing you in a van for deportation or worse

        I’ll take the money every time

  • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    What’s even the point of option 1 if you can’t do anything with the money to make the world a better place? I mean, you could be aware and still be amorally, sociopathically self-interested like many rich and influential people from policy makers to asset fund managers and CEOs and simply give no fucks, but it’s rare to be such a monster and I hope there are none on my Lemmy, lol. Between ignorance and complete awareness but being unable to help whilst being capable of doing so and willing too because you’re not a monster, the choice is obvious.

    • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      26 days ago

      I’ll take the money and use it to make things easier for My loved ones. Then I’ll start making as many new loved ones as I can and helping those people. I’m not allowed to use My wealth to fix the system, but I can make a new system based on mutual aid. I can make things a little easier for people.

  • ButteryMonkey@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    27 days ago

    I’d have to go with the money because I can’t see myself remaining blissfully unaware for very long. I’d like to, certainly, but it would require a level of isolation or willful ignoring of things to sustain. Or be literally incapable of noticing things happening around you. And I just don’t see any of that as a long term option without some sort of brain damage.

    But I could use my wealth to create things, ostensibly for myself, that benefit other people. Perhaps buy land and make educational farms for the surrounding communities, complete with paid educators leading gardening and cooking classes. Perhaps build and maintain libraries of various sorts or museums or parks for the public to use freely. That’s not giving it away or donating it, because I’d still own all of it, nor is it actively spent to fix the system (unless you count a lack of third spaces as part of the system, which it is technically) but it is using it for social good, which is something I want to do which means I’d be spending it on myself, technically.

  • remon@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    26 days ago

    I’ll take the hundreds of millions of dollars … seems there is not much of a catch.

  • P1nkman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    27 days ago

    Money. Easy. I’d give away most of the money to charity or something, and keep $10 million and invest it properly. I could happily live off the interest, and it would not change the system at all.

    • ramble81@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      Amended to note you can’t give it away. It all can only be used for your own selfish gain.

      • phonics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        26 days ago

        Could buy crypto. Then sell the crypto for money again. And it’d be different money. And you are being selfish because your will is trying to do things that are not allowed.

  • Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    26 days ago

    Define donate or give away.

    I’ve mentioned before that I help run a small music festival, and that it’s to help my local area. Raising money for that is a lot of work and takes a lot of energy. Pumping some money in would massively help the festival, which would help me. Would that count as donating, or would it be selfish because it helps me?

    On a similar note, my area is quite poor. If I set up a factory with offices and other facilities that employed the low and unskilled workers at decent living wages, and included child care and employee training and education, would it still count as giving the money away if I made a profit, even if a small one?

    I would be a bit selfish though, I’d build a house and some outbuildings on a large plot of land and soundproof everything completely. I function better at night, but still want to fix up my motorbike and do some woodworking, and I don’t want to wake the neighbours.

  • untorquer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    26 days ago

    I don’t get the stipulation. Using it to help community and fix the system would be using it for my own interest. I would be doing that for myself because i selfishly want to live in a better world. Furthermore, that would require i don’t pay taxes so it’s kind of a liability unless it’s permanently locked away in investments.

    Maybe i keep that money invested to back debt so i can borrow and give the banks money away. 🤷

    • IronBird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      you can tell all these “would you rather be poor or rich with a minor inconvenience”-questions come from rich people, fucking give me the $ asshole. being poor fucking sucks, living 1 paycheck away from destitution literally warps your mind. your in survival mode barely capable of looking into/considering the future