Do we have concrete incriminating evidence of wrongdoing? Like, even if you have written extensively with Jeffrey and visited his Island, that still doesn’t prove that you’re guilty of anything. I think probably you are, but it’s very difficult to prove.
Sure, you might even admit that you slept with women on the island - but again, how to prove that these women were not of consenting age, or that they were not on the island by their own free will?
https://www.epsteinexposed.com/
I’ve read more of the files than I would like to admit. Yes, we do.
Be a good boi and bend over like a lil 9-5 that takes orders from their master and obeys it.
I really couldn’t care less for evidence right now. If someone was there, fucking hang them, because nobody goes on a fucking sex trafficing torture island unless they’re either being taken advantage of or taking advantage of others. Considering Musk wasn’t let kn board there’s no way someone that’s unaware of things could have got on the island.
Well again probably but not verifiable without a reasonable doubt. If you wanna institutionalise your association bias and kill them all anyways, I’ve heard North Korea has great frameworks for this sort of thing
just my random opinion here…i have a feeling a lot of people out there probably feel the same way, but (the ones actually capable of carrying this kind of stuff out, atleast) they’re just waiting for this upcoming midterms to play out, see if dems/progressives really do sweep it then they get 1 more chance to actually hold these animals accountabile…and if they don’t, then people start getting executed in their beds/out on the streets
Arrested? We should stand up and kill these people. Did you read what was in those files?
Yes and its horrific what they did to little kids. I have posted a page to make the public especially 9-5s aware that if you dont stand up now tomorrow they will come after your kids while you’re slaving at work.
Does your CEO know about these anti capitalist rhetoric. Laws were made for the lower classes.
I’m sure MINE would be shocked. He’s one of the good ones.
I hope everyone hears the sarcasm.
The CEO of our company is also a stupid 9-5. He doesn’t own the company so gotta slave for 10 years. He’s lucky as he won’t be slaving for 30 years just to pay of a mortgage on 1 home.
Always have been
You knew ? I see you enjoy bending over. You must be a good obedient boy
Yes.
Are those rhetorical questions?
Not that I’m aware of and duh
In Capitalism Capital is the suveren. Law and Order institutions always protect the suveren.
Yea…do something about it then.
You’re literally doing the same thing they are.
Hope they increase your countrys retirement age.
Maybe the courts are too backed up with habeus cases from citizens jailed by ICE
I thought the supreme court overturned the Constitution…
Not one person has been arrested yet after the Epstein files were released?
That’s why the Biden admin didn’t want to release the files. Public scrutiny isn’t helpful to determining whether a charge is legally feasible or not. The government had the files the whole time. Of course, current Trump DOJ is filled with a bunch of new hires with zero training slaving over bogus immigration detainments.
During Biden the investigation was still ongoing, Maxwell was sentenced and was appealing.
SCOTUS for some “strange reason” extended her appeal time until 2025, essentially putting seal on the files.
I can’t say what Biden was or wasn’t planning to do, but releasing files was not an option because of SCOTUS.
To be frank as long as the investigation was ongoing there was a chance that charges would be pressed (you might argue that would never happen, but that’s a speculation)
What trump did though is when he took office he shut down the investigation, said there’s nothing to investigate, no charges to being and basically portrayed that Epstein was just that guy living in basement and downloaded tons of CP.
This is why people demand files released. If there is no investigation ongoing and no charges were placed, let us see them and decide ourselves if that conclusion is reasonable.
let us see them and decide ourselves if that conclusion is reasonable.
Non-lawyers have zero capacity to do that, though. There’s a big difference between what any one person wants the law to be and what it actually is.
True, true. Child fucking is tricky legal territory.
I’m sure we can find few lawyers outside of DOJ.
Besides, lawyers exist because courts have strict requirements regarding interpretation of a law in order to sentence someone.
You don’t need to study law to be able to tell that somebody did something heinous or not.
You don’t need to study law to be able to tell that somebody did something heinous or not.
A lot of heinous things aren’t necessarily against the law. For example, there’s an email in the file from a law professor advising him on legally trafficking minors to states with lower ages of consent.
IS it Illegal to Rape and Traffick Kids? What a TOUGH question to Answer!
Turns out if you’re careful about the specific kids and you have enough money then yes it is de facto legal.
Take some time and seriously reflect on the difference between how you think legality works and what you’re witnessing.
