• scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Reading this, I was reminded of how Nicolas Cage is part of the Coppola family but changed his name, I was told, so that he could “make it on his own.”

    I looked that up and it turns out to be a complete lie. He actually changed his name to conceal the fact that he was not making it on his own.

    EDIT to clarify if this was confusing: he was given roles by his uncle Francis Ford Coppola. This is nepotism aka “not making it on his own,” but with special help from family. To conceal the nepotism, his name was changed.

    From Wikipedia:

    At age 15, he tried to convince his uncle, Francis Ford Coppola, to give him a screen test, telling him “I’ll show you acting.” His outburst was met with “silence in the car.”[20] By this stage of his career, Coppola had already directed Marlon BrandoAl PacinoGene Hackman and Robert De Niro. Although early in his career Cage appeared in some of his uncle’s films, he changed his name to Nicolas Cage to avoid the appearance of nepotism as Coppola’s nephew. His choice of name was inspired by the Marvel Comicssuperhero Luke Cage and composer John Cage.[21][22]

    • texture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      how does changing his famous last name conceal that he was not making it on his own? what?

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 months ago

        He was given roles in his uncles film because he was his nephew. The name change just swept this under the rug. He wanted to get the roles but not let anyone know he got them through favoritism.

        • texture@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          this comment makes sense, but your original comment said something else that was genuinely confusing.

          • scarabic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            I guess it could be interpreted ways other than I intended, but since I know how it was intended, it’s kind of hard for my brain to successfully see how.

            • texture@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              somehow it seemed like you were saying that he was trying to hide that he was failing at making it on his own, which is confusing in a couple directions. anwyay sorry for taking up your time. i meant well and wish you the best. :)

    • Godric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I miss when actors used to be some random boxer a director met in a Cuban bar or the drunk tank, instead of the executive producer’s nibling or some fucking baronet.

        • Godric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          True lol, it’s never not been, it’s hardwired into humans, but it was nice when certain industries were new and there wasn’t so much buildup for the enthrenchment

          • scarabic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yes I think when an industry is new is about the only time that existing power structures don’t dominate, albeit briefly. I saw this up close with the advent of the WWW. In the early days, coding HTML was like working magic, and there were no established players who had a lock on how to do it better than what any enterprising young person could teach themselves through tinkering.