Should all monopolies be split into different companies which would be given to the workers who would collectivize them?

  • Just_Lyin@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    26 days ago

    A consolidation of power in the media sector. Good for those who want to control narratives. Bad for the dissemination of opposing viewpoints, and thus bad for regular people. Same as it ever was.

  • birdwing
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    26 days ago

    Terrible, it should never be allowed that companies can grow this large.

  • deltapi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    26 days ago

    I think that mergers like this only ever benefit those who are responsible for taking the money out of the companies beforehand.
    I believe that there has never been a merger of two near equally terrible companies that has ever benefited the consumers or the general public. It is almost always geared to getting a small number of investors paid.

  • Shotgun_Alice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    26 days ago

    This is the Orbanization of media, in Hungary Orban gave broadcasting licenses to only those who supported him. Here in America instead of using licenses as the mechanism they’re just using money to do the same thing. America needs a serious discussion on trust busting to start breaking up big businesses. Be ready for CNN to become Fox News light.

  • credo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    26 days ago

    I’m going to drop my HBO sub and hope others do the same. The right is buying all the truth-telling media and shareholders need to feel this one deeply.

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    26 days ago

    Monopolies should be treated with a heavier hand than what they are in the US currently.

    I don’t agree with just confiscating property without due process and I definitely don’t agree with using tax payer money to buy out the current owners just to give it to the workers.

  • DomeGuy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    26 days ago

    This is a billionaire buying the good name of trusted companies so he can have a propaganda house that isn’t obviously such.

  • whaleross@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    26 days ago

    I think that the top tier actors that are making statements on social media or when accepting their awards should put their money where their mouth is and work with smaller independent companies that can make this an opportunity to grow.

  • makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    26 days ago

    I have mixed thoughts. Overall I anticipate it being a net negative. Mergers like this result in fewer jobs, lower quality products and less competition. However I love movies (check my profile if you want proof) and specifically I love going to the movie theater. Paramount has continued supporting movie theaters which is more than you can say about Netflix and Sarandos. Likewise Zaslav was just making anti-consuner decisions left and right. I can count on more than one hand the amount of times I’ve called that man a piece of shit. Not to mention Netflix’s slavish attachment to “the algorithm” just churns out a lot of slop

    So while the merger is bad it’s probably the better of the two options and anything that reduces David Zaslav’s power is a net positive in my book, even if he makes a small country’s worth of money doing it

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      26 days ago

      However I love movies

      if you love movies, you should hate every merger… ALL mergers are about buying market share and eliminating competition, with no competition you will get whatever slop they think will be commercially successful and call it a day (just look at all the great IP domain Disney has ruined via acquisitions)

      • makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        26 days ago

        Overall I anticipate it being a net negative. Mergers like this result in fewer jobs, lower quality products and less competition

        I mean… I led with that. I don’t like the merger, but I like it more than Netflix acquiring them. There are takes beyond black and white

        • Jhex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          26 days ago

          hmmmm I don’t see there is much room here beyond black and white…

          As is, the industry would compare to 2 fairly ill individuals that still manage… after the merger it would be like having one terminal patient, one with terminal brain cancer or the other with advance Alzheimer; a difference with no distinction at that point

  • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    26 days ago

    Brought to you by Bill Clinton’s Telecom Reform Act. Something like this would have been illegal before then.

  • yogurt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    25 days ago

    It’s the same thing Discovery did in the first place. This is the last moment of TV having value before the boomers are dead so Discovery merged with Warner to make a big ball of shit that Netflix would have to buy if they wanted Game of Thrones and Superman. Paramount doesn’t want to be left out so they’re adding all their shit to the ball and they’ll try to sell it to Netflix again in 2 years.