• FrankLaskey@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      5 days ago

      And diesel prices (which underpin essentially all industry and production) have gone even more brrrrrrrrrr. Which means just about everything else will be shooting up in price soon if the strait remains closed…

      • Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        5 days ago

        Right its crazy.

        We have diesel for Aud$2.42 a litre where I am.

        A week ago it was $1.84

        I repair the machines that unload boats at the port, some of those hold 12000 litres of diesel and use 3/4 of it unloading a container ship.

        Just that volume alone will effect the cost of shit

            • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              5 days ago

              Reminds me of the first episode of Smiling Friends when one of the main character’s father starts complaining about working in the ‘bloody mines all day’.

              • Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                5 days ago

                In Australia you can make a great living from it if you can handle the sacrifices you make.

                Away from home for 3 to 4 weeks at a time 12 hour shifts with half hour travel each way to and from camp ontop.

                Most places you do your own laundry but meals are provided.

                Most of the jobs are also in the hottest most remote parts of Australia too where temperatures routinely reach the high 40s.

                But you do that and can earn over 200k a year with just an apprenticeship behind you

      • SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 days ago

        And much of the world’s fertilizer is shipped out of the strait of hormuz,and it’s currently spring, when fields would be getting fertilized right now. So food prices will jump too, and crop yields will be Lower

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    140
    ·
    5 days ago

    Wright posted that “the US Navy successfully escorted an oil tanker through the Strait of Hormuz to ensure oil remains flowing to global markets,” crediting President Donald Trump with “maintaining stability of global energy during the military operations against Iran.”

    Within hours, a senior source in the IRGC’s naval force told Iranian outlet Iran Now that the claim “has no basis in truth,” insisting that no US-escorted tanker had transited the strait.

    The source described the announcement as part of a “media war and attempts to mislead public opinion,” adding that the strait remains under “precise surveillance” by Iranian forces and that “any military movement in the area is fully monitored.”

    Wright subsequently deleted the post without public explanation, undermining a week of administration messaging aimed at convincing the world that commercial traffic would soon resume.

    For an administration that relies so heavily on propaganda lies, they are remarkably terrible at lying.

    In any case, even if it were true and not a pathetic lie, Donald Trump would deserve no credit for slightly mitigating the problems Donald Trump caused when Donald Trump decided to start bombing Iran and slaughtering its civilians.

    • evenglow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      5 days ago

      At a certain point the propaganda stops making any sense on purpose. It’s not designed to deceive. It’s used to identify resistance.

    • madde@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 days ago

      the timeline in which the IGRC’s public statement are more trustworthy than US officials…

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      They have always been bad at lying. Every lie this administration tells is obviously transparent, if they were good enough to concoct a reasonable lie they would be intelligent enough to not get involved in a war with an oil producing country without first restocking their oil reserves. No one this administration has any brains at all.

  • apftwb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Oil companies and oil tanker crews are subject to the same fog of war as everyone else. They don’t know if there are mines. They don’t know if they can trust the US government to protect them or pay out the insurance. They have seen US bases get bombed. They don’t know if the US is lying or not because trust in the US is at an all time low.

    It doesn’t matter if the strait is mined or not, because the perception the strait could be mined is enough. It is simply not worth the risk.

    Edit: lmao nevermind. 3 ships just tried running the blockade. Emphasis on tried

    • Paragone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 days ago

      Tanker-insurance is impossible to get, now, therefore there simply won’t be any ships going through, until that gets remedied.

      & it won’t get remedied until MUCH more than “an assertion that it’s clear” is in-place.

      https://shanakaanslemperera.substack.com/p/actuarial-warfare-how-seven-insurance

      It’s going to be 1/4y MINIMUM before ships begin going through, again, from the looks of that…

      maybe closer to a year.

      Dominoes got BIG, thanks to the economic-rules underpinning everything in industry…

      _ /\ _

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        If only this wall could have been prevented. Sadly that was impossible since the US started it for no reason at all, oh wait.

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 days ago

      They don’t know if they can trust the US government to protect them or pay out the insurance.

      With how many of Trump’s lawyers got their bills paid in full and on time, I would be skeptical too.

  • ZMoney@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    4 days ago

    Trump, the climate change denialist, doing his best to speed up the green energy transition.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 days ago

      Its because European countries announced they are going to release strategic reserves.

      I still don’t get it though because that only covers 2 weeks and Iran has already taken down some permanent capacity in the region and a bunch of places had to stop pumping (meaning well mineralization and reopening times of months). I would expect oil to be at $100 even with the strategic reserves announcement.

      • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        In the next couple weeks, demand is going to go down as the weather warms up. After that, they have all summer to to work on shifting production to renewables as much as possible and shifting fossil fuel suppliers to ones that don’t need to use that strait.

        • mirshafie@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          Summer somewhat affects natural gas. Demand for petrol and fertilizer doesn’t go down in the summer. There’s no way renewables are going to have an effect on the demand for those commodities in the next 12 months.

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      How much sense it makes depends on which markets went up. If, for example, you are an Alberta oil producer, this situation is wonder for the bottom line.

  • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    The convoy idea is so dumb that I can’t believe anyone said it out loud. Effective strategy against commerce raiders, which Iran explicitly does not have. Might as well offer to mount a CIWS on tankers and hope your insurance premiums will see it as a wash (they won’t). Makes as much sense as suggesting you counter drones with cavalry.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 days ago

      If I was one of those oil companies, I’d say sure. You staff the tanker with your people and you insure us for any losses incurred. Also, put an upfront amount of insurance money in escrow.

      But we’re not risking lives, merchandise, and equipment. You want the oil that badly. You move it. We’re just going to raise oil prices to cover our losses in the meantime, so we’re fine.

      • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        5 days ago

        Oh they tried this, admin offered to pay oil companies for damages and move it themselves. Little catch there is tanker ships take half a decade or longer to build. The companies cannot afford to roll the dice on losing one, even if they’ll get reimbursed for the ship. They lose capacity ($$$) waiting for the replacement.

        • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Of course. The US government would have to insure it. No private company is touching that with a 10 foot pole.

          • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            5 days ago

            No company is going to trust insurance from this administration though. That’s the problem with having a Trump who famously never pays his debts.

            • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              5 days ago

              Which is why I said insurance in escrow.

              Trump is famous for stiffing people. I’d want that money paid upfront and held in escrow by an independent financial firm in a neutral nation.

              If a ship gets hit, escrow pays out for the oil, the ship, and the loss of future earnings. If the ships never sink, the money goes back to the US.

      • TehWorld@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        It’s not just normal insurance cost either. These ships take years to replace. They also have to insure against the multiple years worth of profits and loss of market share.

        • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          Exactly. It’s the ship, the goods, the lost earning over many years, severance for staff that won’t be used, etc. It would be mess.

          I also wonder how clean up for a spill would be handled. Currently that’s managed by Iran and the vessel that spilled pays.

        • mirshafie@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          Also, if they sink in a bad spot, they’ll physically block the strait. It’s a narrow corridor that’s navigable.

    • teegus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 days ago

      Makes as much sense as suggesting you counter drones with cavalry.

      Not drones exactly but this is a sound straregy in the early civilization games

      • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        5 days ago

        The Shahed-136 uses a MD550 engine, spec sheet says that’s 50 horsepower. An actual horse has a peak output somewhere between 10 and 15 horsepower[1] so it should only take 4 or 5 horses to match/exceed the Shahed’s strength. Seems reasonable enough to me, it’s simple math.


        1. Stevenson, Robert & Wassersug, Richard. (1993). Horsepower from a horse. Nature. 364. 195. 10.1038/364195a0. ↩︎

    • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      The math on the convoy doesn’t make sense to me.

      The larger the convoy becomes a more attractive target, as a single salvo of missiles has greater chance of bypassing missile defences and hitting any target.

      Plus they have drones or missile boats, which would be harder to defend against. You can do missile defence in a radius around a ship, but now there’s obstacles and small fast moving targets that only need to land 1 hit and can use blind spots.

      So I guess you need 3+ navy ships to form a perimeter and guard a few tankers at once.

      But now there’s mines, so your perimeter becomes another vulnerability, you’ve increased the surface area where mines can be.

      So now you can add more navy ships to get better geometry but it’s a much higher cost.

      • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 days ago

        Also, the US lies about what it is going to do all the time.

        In fact, there is a big fat lie right in this article in which the US claimed to have already escorted a ship through despite the fact that they simply did nothing of the sort.

        Would you be willing to stake the economic future of your company, the lives of your staff, and millions of dollars of equipment and product on the promise and competence of these guys?

  • user28282912@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    5 days ago

    Nice to see the US government still supporting EVs these days.

    I still think that EV rebates and tax credits would be more cost efficient and much less jarring than provoking Iran into destroying 20% of the world’s oil supply… but I guess that I am too simple-minded for politics.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      No joke, electricity is getting so expensive that I was just about break even on running my PHEV on gas vs. electric… Then this happens to make the choice easy again

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 days ago

        Well funding for those data centers are getting blown up… literally in the case of Amazon’s data center. So we might get to see that AI bubble pop that we have all been hearing so much about. That should help a little bit. Too bad Trump is offsetting that by cancelling all renewable projects though.

  • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 days ago

    Please, someone tell me I’m not the only idiot that read this and thought they were trying to do the other type of mining.

    The one that doesn’t make sense at all, but rather than realising that’s not the mining they were doing, because it doesn’t make sense. I just got more confused as to what they possibly could have found there worth mining for in the middle of a war.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    If US politicians ever imposed consequences on rich elites we might have avoided having had to learn the lesson of consequences from Iran.