She’s rich, so she knows that things are different for Anakin. Several genocides more later, and turns out she was right, he gets completely absolved and becomes a force ghost as a younger version of himself to boot. Something something dark side affluenza. The force is basically just another dimension to wealth inequality.
“Midoclorians” is just another word for inheritance.
We are censoring genocide now?
Is it censorship to have mcdonalds sponsor your genocide?
I’ve seen much milder words being censored. Words that don’t even have any negative connotations.
Maybe it’s to avoid getting buried in the algorithm on mainstream apps that avoid that word. It’s likely just a copy paste from one of those.
“The algorithm” really doesn’t care about font changes.
People’s grasp of modern computing is insanely outdated. Nobody does simple string matching at scale like in the ye olden forums.
Any decently advanced system will “know” the words you black out or write in a weird font or with a modern expression like “unalive”
Even with the consumer accessible multi-modal language models reading AND understanding th context of text in images is fully trivial
Yet publications on TikTok with the word suicide get banned and deleted, while unalived do not.
It’s true that they do know what the content is about, it’s just the politics of online social networks shaping communication.
I can’t tell if it’s censorship or meme spelling
I know I am. So sick of the overuse and devaluation of the word here.
Which genocide shouldn’t be called a genocide? Come on, say it.
I’m not defending them, but arguably neither of the two in Star Wars being referenced here should be called that. Maybe the jedi one is, if we consider them a religious group and not a political one (debatable at the point of the attack), because it was a widespread extermination of them. The sand people one was just a mass murder though. There wasn’t a systemic extermination of the people, only a large retribution killing of a single group.
Still though, they’re close enough that we all know what it’s talking about. It’s fine.
He means Gaza, his comment isnt about star wars.
The meme is.
Seems like a cowardly way of saying you want to ignore all the increasing number of genocides happening in the world.
That’s one interpretation.
Well, considering that you’re refusing to provide any other interpretation, it’s the most probable one.
Come on now, what do people here call a genocide that you think shouldn’t be called a genocide?
Can you give us an example of things you don’t like being referred to as “genocide”?
But c*nsored usage is still usage. Everybody can see the word.
B-based
B*sed.
Vader: I have committed many genocides, you will have to be more specific.
After she dismissed him murdering what was certainly over a dozen children as “everyone is human” i dismissed her as any moral authority on anything,
Remember, the only Sith who is also a human supremacist was from Naboo.
do we even have a full count of all the genocides?
Was Vader involved in the genosian genocide, too?
Are we counting the genocides during the clone wars?
Sure. Edit: the geonosians were genocided after the clone wars when they were used to start construction on the Death Star and genocided to hide it by the empire.
Bet that made it hard to go back to the builder and order a second one.
I will never understand why the empire didn’t use captured b1 units as droid labor.
Yes, they’re totally incompetent. But it’s either incompetence or intentional sabotage.
Its because the best robot they could do in the 1980s was a guy in a gold suit or a wheelie bin.
TPM was the 90’s, they started production in 1997, first in theaters in 99.
and for the record, I was on my third FDM printer. or maybe my second. (depends if you count my dad’s inkjet that I strapped my mom’s hot glue gun to. Just for the record, I did ask if I could have the printer.))
The empire was only in the original trilogy, so for “the empire to use captured B1 battledroids” they would have needed to be on screen in the eighties.
Oh, Im not saying that shouldnt be counted just saying Anakin committed a ton of war crimes during the clone wars, you did ask for the full count of genocides afterall
I get that, I was just adding context for people who haven’t seen Rebels. (if anyone hasn’t seen rebels… you should.)
Like the poisoning of Honoghr?
I imagine one is the sand-people tribe, that is arguably ok, and the other is the younglings murder that is a serious misuse of that word.
well the younglings murder was a genocide of the Jedi people. The rampage on the sandpeople tribe was murderous revenge
I don’t think that’s a genocide though.
Mostly because in the Star Wars universe you can’t really wipe out either the Jedi or the Sith. Both try to wipe the other out but haven’t succeedes whatsoever because they are extremely basic religious/philosophical positions: “The force exists to do ‘good’ (whatever ‘good’ is)” vs. “The force exists to make me strong”. Jedi are Jedi and Sith are Sith only because of those values plus some beaurocracy.
Compare that to human religions where they first construct an extremely elaborate setting with a shitton of incorporated fanfiction to argue why they and only they are right and all others are wrong. That’s so much more complex, you’d have to stop believing in a billion different things if you were to switch religions.
Tl;dr: It’s not genocide if I were to kill all philosophy students at my university because in my point of view their views are evil.
He did at least 2 genocides in the movies before the OT, where he destroyed a planet with tarkin, but didn’t he do some genocidal things in the clone wars shows too?
Well, but those would be genocides against Clankers…so it undoes one of the earlier genocides.
Yoda: “Know of second genocide, she does not.”
Do we have conclusive evidence for his intend?
