God if he ruins this I would be so upset. I don’t even live in that area but I’m just happy to see an expansion of that sort of infrastructure in Canada
I thought it was basic economics that increasing mobility increases production.
It’s dumbass bullshit like this that proves that modern conservatives are not meant to be taken seriously. They are a party of billionaire donors that are only interested in taxing the ever loving fuck out of regular people to fund tax breaks for their blindingly rich donors.
As gas prices are at record levels, PP tries to keep you dependent on cars and gasoline.
EVERYTHING PP does is an attempt to make you buy oil & gas.
It’s not going to help me whatsoever. It only helps the elites from Ontario and Quebec.
Hello 1 week old account, your username is a little on the nose.
Nice! Thanks!
Elites take planes, not trains you moron. If you think everyone who lives in a big city is an elite you probably need to get off the internet and spend time wirh real people
I live in Ontario and am sure as hell noe elite nor are my neighbours. We all support this as it will help us travel faster without driving. Alberta gas and oil can go get fucked.
So its a liberal “land grab” because some land may be used to build desperately needed infrastructure, something that happens all the time for roadway construction and expansion, yet hes silent on conservative premier Doug Fords Airport BS that somehow isn’t a convervative land grab?
How fortunate for Carney to have this guy as an opponent.
That is literally the only reason he won!
Eat shit, PP.
Conservative leader demands taxpayer money be wasted during an oil crisis.
Meanwhile a $40B (min) pipeline that no private oil&gas company wants is a totally realistic and smart project to spend on. Keep talking PP, it’s working!
Plus the $20-25B we dump into Alberta oil every single year.
“doesn’t make sense” Talk to us at $2L gas l’il PP.
Subsiding Alberta oil at $20B a year really makes no sense.
“This $90-billion Liberal boondoggle doesn’t make sense.”
This isn’t even a boondoggle yet. I mean, of course it’s going to go way over budget and be late, and of course it will eventually be a boondoggle, but you can’t slap that label on it until it is!
Considering the Liberal track record, the final bill would be closer to $300billion.
The joy of using the lowest bidder. Takes longer, costs more, lower quality. Procurement needs to change. Lowest bid always costs more cause they cut corners to be lowest, then the city/province/feds need to pony up more and more in sunk cost bs. Lowest bid and highest bid need to be tossed, requirements to stay on budget/time need to be implemented and used as a metric in future projects. This company always goes over time/budget? They get pushed down the list, only accepted for lower level projects until they prove themselves. Project comes in on time/budget? They get a leg up on next project as they are reliable. Why does every effort of the gov’t to save money cost us more?
How far under budget is Metrolinx under Drug Ford?
He should just shut up and fuck off somewhere. Nothing of value would be lost.
I don’t live there but there’s no way this is not needed.
He should just shut up and fuck off somewhere.
Not a single brain cell in that picture.
It’s going to add $8,000 debt to every family in Canada.
$90B is l’il PP’s number, the actual estimate is $30B less.
This is how cons work, add a fake number to something they want to kill, then kill it.
The long gun registry was $2B/yr under Harper, yet no one could explain why. Quebec had their own registry after that and it cost $5M/yr.
Of course, the economic benefit to this corridor longer term will be a much bigger number.
Do you think we will ever be told what the economic benefit is predicted to be, and then the actual number?
Not how government spending works
Poilievre isn’t against money it just has to spent to benefit those already in power.
I reckon the high speed rail will benefit those in power, but it doesn’t benefit him
What I would like to see is include the ticket price, and then include how many years before the project is paid for. Obviously, also include the savings incurred by less maintenance on roads etc. because of the traffic moved to high speed rail.
We can do this for bridges, why not for high speed rail?
We can do this for bridges, why not for high speed rail?
Because we periodically elect PCs, who will sell this off on 100 year leases.
Not just less maintenance on roads and bridges, but also reduced need for building new and expanded roads and bridges.
Don’t get ahead of your self. This project will never pay for its self. If people used mass transit via would have alot more service. Porter airlines wouldn’t be pushing for turbo jets to go further destinations. You got be realistic about these things.
This project is 1, a wicked subsidy that’s gona create a healthy amount of jobs, good skilled jobs. I can expand on that further. 2 a way to put Canada 🇨🇦 on the map of not being bass akward USA light.
I think a couple of things can be true at the same time. Long term, high speed rail is a good thing. Also true is this project will definitely be vastly over budget. I would just like to see some concrete data to let us know the planners have actually looked at the factors.
PP says a lot of stupid things.
It is kinda his thing.
