not_IO to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 days agowhy is this still an issue?external-linkmessage-square96linkfedilinkarrow-up1624file-text
arrow-up1624external-linkwhy is this still an issue?not_IO to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 days agomessage-square96linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareVelma@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·10 days agoThis is a wild idea but hear me out, you could read the other comments here to realize that there’s less options for women to have bigger pockets and that’s the main issue. Not that there are no pants that exist with deep pockets Hope that helps.
minus-squareCypher@aussie.zoneBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 days agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareVelma@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·9 days agoYou’ve completely missed the entire point that’s been talked thoroughly in the comment section already. There’s a dearth of options for women’s pants with big pockets. We’re allowed to complain about it, especially in a place as innocuous as a comment section on a forum. If hearing about small issues that women grapple with bother you, then you can either buck up or get out.
minus-squareCypher@aussie.zoneBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 days agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareVelma@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·9 days agoThe fact that you think the other option is just skinny jeans tells me that you simply don’t want to understand why women have an issue with this. Read through the comments. You might learn something.
minus-squareCypher@aussie.zoneBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 days agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareVelma@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·9 days agoYou’re incredibly fragile if stumbling on women having a discussion about pants options makes you this upset.
minus-squareCypher@aussie.zoneBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 days agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareVelma@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·9 days agoBeing upset about women having a conversation was just a bonus then lol Take care of that fragile ego out there. Wouldn’t want a woman to absolutely destroy it by chatting about something like earrings.
This is a wild idea but hear me out, you could read the other comments here to realize that there’s less options for women to have bigger pockets and that’s the main issue. Not that there are no pants that exist with deep pockets
Hope that helps.
Removed by mod
You’ve completely missed the entire point that’s been talked thoroughly in the comment section already.
There’s a dearth of options for women’s pants with big pockets.
We’re allowed to complain about it, especially in a place as innocuous as a comment section on a forum.
If hearing about small issues that women grapple with bother you, then you can either buck up or get out.
Removed by mod
The fact that you think the other option is just skinny jeans tells me that you simply don’t want to understand why women have an issue with this.
Read through the comments. You might learn something.
Removed by mod
You’re incredibly fragile if stumbling on women having a discussion about pants options makes you this upset.
Removed by mod
Being upset about women having a conversation was just a bonus then lol
Take care of that fragile ego out there. Wouldn’t want a woman to absolutely destroy it by chatting about something like earrings.