A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 days agoWell...lemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square21linkfedilinkarrow-up1179
arrow-up1179imageWell...lemmy.dbzer0.comA404@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 days agomessage-square21linkfedilink
minus-squarelurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 days agorights imply laws. laws aren’t anarchist.
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up6·7 days agoYou should probably understand the concept behind human rights before you talk about either anarchism or liberalism, both of which accept the idea.
minus-squaregurty@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·6 days agoThat implies that you can’t have any rights unless the government says you can have them.
minus-squaretoo_high_for_this@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·6 days agoNo rulers is not the same as no rules.
rights imply laws. laws aren’t anarchist.
You should probably understand the concept behind human rights before you talk about either anarchism or liberalism, both of which accept the idea.
That implies that you can’t have any rights unless the government says you can have them.
No rulers is not the same as no rules.