She sells magical crucifixes and has warned of consequences from God for those who don’t stand with the president.
The president’s spiritual advisor, Florida-based televangelist scammer Paula White-Cain, said at a book-signing event this week that saying no to Donald Trump is the same thing as saying no to the Christian god.
While speaking during the event, White-Cain recounted how the president asked her to join his Evangelical advisory board before his 2016 inauguration, saying, “He’s got a strong persona, don’t get me wrong. Don’t start a fight with him.”
“Why would the evangelicals come out and vote for him?” she asked before saying that “God told me to” join his advisory board.
“Because one thing I said, ‘I’ll never do politics,'” she said. “But when it came down to it, it wasn’t about doing politics. It was about an assignment. To say no to President Trump would be saying no to God. And I won’t do that.
This lady is cancer
She is the Yoko-ono of Journey. As in her husband Jonathan Cain, the lead songwriter for Journey (Don’t Stop Believin’ etc) basically blew up the band by going full maga. They broke up just before I was due to see them in 2024 😭
Because McCain wasn’t good enough
A god that is aligned with Trump, is one that I reject.
Holy shit that is the quintessential Mar-a-Lago face.
The divine right of ……… the president of the USA!!! Please. The entire world is waiting for one of 1) him to die 2) the midterms 3) the Supreme Court to strike down his stupid tarrifs 4) another US-style coup.
deleted by creator
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot! Krasnov has this lunatic while the drunk in charge of the military has the nutter Doug Wilson.
Misread the headline and thought it said trump’s spiteful advisor.
Super mega apostasy
Or Pseudokhristos
Both fit the scheme of the tmnt theme
Isnt this the plot line of the latest series of The Boys?
The Boys writers: “People aren’t grasping the satire, is it still too subtle? Crank it up I guess.”
Reality:
The fact that people think Trump has a soul is alarming. His existence alone should disprove god.
The Christian god, perhaps. There’s also the deistic god, the first cause god, the pantheistic god, … so many gods. Our society kind of sucks at understanding god. There are so many definitions of god that don’t require concessions in science, yet the one that is attacked so often is only the anthropic god. Which is too bad, because it just leaves people feeling like they’re missing something important about community connection. When all we can agree on is that god is bullshit, we don’t have a common value set that helps us organize into larger structures. All we get is fucking Pilates workout groups, coffee shops selling us overpriced fruit bowls, and weird desperate attempts for connection with the gas station clerks.
We never needed a god.
I don’t believe in god. But I do think it’s a valid and possibly necessary part of human history. Hence, it happened and we are here now. That information (even “god”) supported the evolution of our mind.
There are so many definitions of god that don’t require concessions in science,
Name one.
I can name like ten.
But you asked for one, so here you go.
The “First Cause” / “Unmoved Mover” (Classical Theism). Associated with Aristotle and later Thomas Aquinas.
God here is not a being in the universe, nor an interventionist agent tinkering with physics. Simply the necessary grounding of existence or causality itself.
Science describes how events unfold within the universe. This concept addresses why there is a universe at all (or why causal chains exist).
There is no contradiction because they operate at different explanatory levels.
My point stands. The common understanding of god is narrowly scoped to the piss poor anthropic god provided by Christianity and the like. There’s a broader world out there.
This concept addresses why there is a universe at all
Shrugging your shoulders and saying “must be god” is not addressing anything.
Which, coincidentally, is perfectly fitting to describe (make up) a god!
There is no necessary grounding for causality. Insisting there must be one is special pleading. And the prime mover god fails in any eternal universe model because infinite regress isn’t a contradiction or impossibility. You’d also have to explain what created god; failing that, you’d have to special plead that it doesn’t need a creator.
All said, the prime mover argument is one of the five dumbest arguments for a god.
But it isn’t a proof for God, It’s a definition of God. And these definitions of God have existed for a long time, which is why I would argue this isn’t a move of the goal post. These are goal posts that have been ignored. There’s also the idea that God is the totality of the universe, and that doesn’t come with any anthropic claims. In fact, I’d argue God being the totality of the universe is closer to some of the beliefs people have in modern day — loosely in association with Astrology, or the belief in some kind of cosmic energies. They just don’t call it God, But if you can distance yourself from the anthropic claims of God, then you can see they’re quite similar.
They do look quite similar, in that they’re beliefs entirely ungrounded in observable evidence or rationality.
This bitch can suck the hairiest, dirtiest part of my nutsack.
I’d like to know which one of the writers of The Boys has an actual working crystal futuretelling sphere. I have some questions about a lottery.
Kripke ended up doing a whole video saying" i swear to god we didn’t know, we were just trying to come up with the most insane shit possible"
FOR real, although they cleverly write their script and make changes based on current political and global situationts while shooting the show.
Yes.
So people grasp this maybe more tangibly:
Between 25% to 35% of the US population is Y’all Qaeda.
They’re completely delusional, psychotic religious extremists, who literally believe that they speak and act with the authority of God, and thus cannot be wrong.
Oh. Okay.
