I want to optimize MR BONES WILD RIDE
It is actually very interesting to see what your code actually causes on the CPU. Nowadays you have quite large instruction sets which help you with many operations what were manual in the past. But even then, you at this point you start counting CPU cycles. Back then, a multiplication by 4, written in C, probably resulted in using 4 CPU cycles of additions, instead of just shifting the bits 2 places left in one cycle. So you just saved 3 cycles. Sounds like nothing, but with only one core at 33MHz and hundreds of such calculations, it will have a much larger impact.
Citation needed! Processors have had multiplication in silicon since forever, and compiler writers aren’t stupid. You can even check on https://godbolt.org/ with old versions. I bet you can’t find a compiler from 1999 that won’t optimize an unsigned integer multiply to a bit shift without turning off optimisations.
C existed for almost a decade, before they added this specific optimization to compilers in late 1970
I was not referencing particularly RCT and was just trying to explain, what optimizations mean on that level, be it automatic or manual.
I started studying “technical IT” for two years before changing to a less technical version that I ended up enjoying more (physics is fun to learn, but I don’t wanna calculate that shit).
One of the most valuable things to come out of it is one class where we worked our way up all the way from logic gates to the functions of an ALU and a rough look at CPUs and memory architecture. Probably would have gone deeper in a follow-up class I never ended up taking.
Point of the course was that one of the focus options for that course featured micro-controllers and embedded systems, including low-level optimisation (the typical memory constraints might be getting more lax, but learning it isn’t a bad idea).I don’t remember most of the details, I’m afraid, but it was an interesting insight into the things I take for granted when working in higher level languages.
Interesting article! You should cross-post to some retro gaming communities, I’m sure they’d love it. I still never okayed this game as it came out when there was too much heat in Sims in the 90s, but probably would have enjoyed it more than some of the sim games I did play.
It’s still fun.
I dunno, I’m sort of underwhelmed.
- use the smallest data type you need for a given purpose (which you don’t really need to worry about on modern hardware for integer types)
- use bitwise arithmetic when possible
- use fake pathfinding when possible (in this case random walk), and when not possible, limit search depth
- don’t do collision detection on thousands of guests; allow them to phase through each other
This is all fairly basic stuff I would hope any game dev would be aware of.
This is all fairly basic stuff I would hope any game dev would be aware of.
The article was written for people who aren’t game devs.
“Allow them to phase through each other” and this is why our IRL simulation has ghosts
reality is also written in c, just a different c
If you are into game optimization tricks you might like this video: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lC4YLMLar5I&pp=ygUhdGhlIGdhbWUgdGhhdCBjb3VsZG4ndCBiZSB3cml0dGVu
It’s about the original Elite, and all tricks needed to create a full virtual galaxy on 8 bit computers
That looks indeed awesome. I didn’t know Elite was developed for the BBC Micro… 22 kB for a 3D open-world fighting/trading/mining flight simulator using only 8-bit integer addition operations. I had no idea…
Link without the pp (ie tracking): https://youtube.com/watch?v=lC4YLMLar5I
RCT made my night classes in 2003 tolerable.
deleted by creator
Oh, well in that case, it should never be shared again. Just delete the article while you’re at it.
The crazy optimisations of RCT pop up all the time.
