• elephantium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        12 days ago

        I didn’t read it that way. It’s just a fact. If you had enough money saved/invested, you could reasonably retire today. If you don’t have anything saved, you can’t afford to retire at any age.

        As the OP shows, even the pension system in the UK (or social security in the US) amounts to little more than a sick joke in comparison to the actual cost of living.

        I know I’m not saying anything new, I’m just rephrasing the GP’s point in a particularly verbose way.

        • Asetru@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          12 days ago

          If you don’t have anything saved, you can’t afford to retire at any age.

          But it’s not supposed to be that way.

          even the pension system in the UK (or social security in the US) amounts to little more than a sick joke

          BUT IT’S NOT SUPPOSED TO BE THAT WAY!

          People usually don’t retire because they can but because they have to. Because they can’t work anymore. Framing it like retirement based on savings only is just an unchangeable fact of nature is just wrong.

          • elephantium@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            12 days ago

            But it’s not supposed to be that way.

            You’re too focused on this, IMO. I can’t fix the injustice here all by my lonesome. What I can do is live beneath my means, save up the extra (and I’m fortunate to have extra after paying for the bare minimum), and have something beyond social security for my own retirement. That’s all any individual can do.

            In a group? In the US, you can vote according to who you think will run Social Security better. But in practical terms, that’s a choice between bad and worse. I don’t like it any more than you do, but I don’t see a realistic alternative in the near future.

            In the UK (or other countries)? Someone else will have to weigh in there.

            • Asetru@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              12 days ago

              This still refers to this shitty comment:

              Retirement is not an age, it’s a financial status.

              I’m not saying you should overthrow the system tomorrow, but those seemingly witty comments that just normalise how messed up the system is just don’t help.

              Retirement is not a financial status. Stupid teenagers that listen to right wing podcasts may think such a remark seems smart, but it is stupid and wrong. Retirement is a necessity that stems directly from the fact that people just can’t work as well at 90 as they can at 35. It’s not a hard concept to grasp and the fact that society makes it hard to stop working after people worked a lifetime but can’t go on anymore isn’t some wisdom to understand, it’s just a neocon’s wet dream and should be described and treated as such.

              • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 days ago

                It would be nice if everyone could be afforded some kind of retirement when they got older. You are correct, in general a 90 year old will be nowhere near productive as a 35 year old. But it would also be nice if people working full time didn’t need food stamps, and if the tax rates were higher, and a whole bunch of other stuff. But that’s not the world we’re living in.

                I have to agree with OP here, right now it IS a financial status. It’s a luxury only afforded to those who have the wealth. The whole idea of “retirement” is fairly new. Even 100 years ago a 90 year old might move in with their kids, provide childcare for the grandkids, help out around the house, etc.

                Just to reiterate I am on your side, retirement SHOULD be something afforded to everyone. That’s just not the world we’re living in.

        • 🍉 DrRedOctopus 🐙🍉@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          12 days ago

          how?

          when most people live paycheck to paycheck, and their biggest luxury is a bobba tea once a month, how the fuck can you do anything about retirement?

          the system is set up to maximize human suffering for profit.

          • minorkeys@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            12 days ago

            It simply stated the reality that retirement comes from having resource access without requiring employment. That’s what it is. Hearing judgement about what should be is you adding it.

    • JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      12 days ago

      Inspiring?? 😭 AAAGH!!

      Okay but honestly the expression on his face kinda looks like he’s one of those people that chooses to work because he prefers “working” & being out in the world seeing lots of people every day & feeling useful rather than sitting at home doing nothing.

      but 103 years old?! At Walmart?! AAAGH!

    • FosterMolasses@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      Disgusting. Contrast this with a similar story in the news of a 103 year old Italian.

      The US treats its most elderly citizens as meat for the slaughter. In the future, when dystopian fiction writers reach for metaphors about true evil, they won’t write retellings of german nazis or things like the Sith, it’ll all be based on the late American empire.

  • Sarah Valentine (she/her)
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    13 days ago

    The same thing that happens every generation to the god-awful number of people who never had hope of retiring to begin with.

  • Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Bold of you to assume that retirement age means anything or is some fixed time when one has to stop working, working becomes illegal or that the society is even stable enough to allow such a thing.

    We’re all just going to keep on working until death.

  • DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    12 days ago

    I’m 50; when I started my career pretty much everyone a little older than me had pensions and I arrived right as the pensions were being phased out. It was a running joke when they would talk about pensions and I would say “what’s a pension?”

    So my age group will be retiring in 15 years, not 30 years. Almost everyone I know my age has a meager 401k and nothing else.

    The streets are going to be flooded with people too old to work and no retirement income in much less than 30 years…

    • olduffer @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      12 days ago

      56 here, I’m in the UK. I have 4 separate ‘private pensions’, from the four different companies I’ve worked for, adding up to fuck all. Basically I’m going to have to work until I’m 67 in order to collect my state pension of £1,049.22 a month. This will allow me to survive on cold baked beans out of a tin, before I freeze to death because I can’t afford to turn on the heating.

        • olduffer @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          12 days ago

          I didn’t get the benefit of a final salary pension. I have also not worked long enough at any particular company to really benefit from a big pot. The longest I’ve worked for one company is ten years, I think the company was paying in as little as possible. When I looked at a forecast for the pay out from that one, it was about £100 a month.

          • Kushan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            12 days ago

            You should consolidate those 4 pensions into one pot and take more control of it. There’s an extremely high chance that the employer provided pension is performing poorly and not growing as fast as it could be. They pick the lowest risk by default so growth is massively stunted.

            It’s pretty easy to open an account on something like vanguard and transfer those pensions in, you can then have control over how that money is invested - usually they make you pick a “risk factor” where highest risk has highest potential growth and lowest has lowest potential for crashing, but the TL;DR is over a 15 year period even if there’s a crash you’ll come out on top because it averages out.

            Essentially what I’m saying is pool your pensions together and pick the highest risk factor for the next 8-10 years, it’s a bit of a gamble but it’s a better chance of that pot growing into something actually useful than you have right now.

        • freebee@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          12 days ago

          Because a lot of pension plans are very disappointing. They for example offer a ‘guaranteed’ minimum intrest of up to 2 % per year, but don’t forget the ‘management costs’ they charge. That’s very very low compared to regular inflation. Pension funds exist to make pension fund managers, traders and banks rich (now, not later) and so that the government can point at them and say “it was your own responsibility!” instead of offering ALL weak and old people enough to cover basic needs. And that’s to “motivate” as many people as possible to work as much as possible. If relatively young right now: you’re probably better off putting money away in time deposits with higher guaranteed intrest than putting it in pension funds. Or ETF/random stock picking for those who feel lucky. The state subsidies to choose pension fund instead of time deposit or direct market investments is in many cases also misleading: you get tax cuts when depositing into the pension funds, but you get taxed when you get paid out at pension age. All differs a lot in different countries, but the core of it is pretty similar all over I think.

      • DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 days ago

        The pensions in the US for the generation before me were “Defined Benefit” pensions. What that meant typically is that if you worked X number of years you could retire with Y percentage of your salary. Both my grandfather and father retired that way.

        Private corporations all switched to 401ks and colluded with all kinds of propagandists to convince the workers that they would be better at investing their own retirement money themselves, ya know, because they were all savvy investors.

        Just based on the Google search I just did 15 seconds ago a “private pension” in the UK is the same tax-sheltered retirement savings account that gets funneled to the markets as a 401k is here in The States.

        So yup, you got screwed too.

  • D_C@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    12 days ago

    It’ll look like a lot of old people working themselves to death, or dying on the street AND future conservative politicians pointing backwards and saying “This is all because you voted for {insert socialist or left leading etc government here} but if we had have conserved X, Y, and Z like we said back then this wouldn’t have happened. Only my conservative/far right or variant of nazi party can get us out of this trouble.”

    It’s what they’ve been doing for decades, and the fucking idiots keep on believing that bullshit decade after decade.

    • 0x0@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      12 days ago

      The media isn’t innocent and destruction of culture and education doesn’t help either.

  • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    12 days ago

    Don’t worry, climate collapse will render industrial agriculture extremely difficult in the current form and society will collapse from there. It’s really a tossup as to who gets it worse, but the whole world will be thrown into chaos and any retirement plan that you DO have will be obliterated and stolen by technocrats and before they too crash and burn.

    I wish that it were any other way but every single time I see something about the climate, it is scientists discovering that things are actually happening sooner and worse than they thought. This has been happening for at least 15 years. What was once “2100 or beyond” became “by 2100” became “by the end of the century” became “around mid century” became “by 2050” became “it could happen any day. It may have already tipped over the edge”

    I’m tired.

    • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      12 days ago

      I expected more wetbulb temperatures happening everywhere by now. I no longer expect climate change alone to wipe us out.

    • Blurntout@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      12 days ago

      Bold of you to assume capitalism survives the Gen X retirement 😅 when you go from families of 8+ children to 2 in one generation your existing pension mechanism and markets that require net contribution to function don’t compute.

      Just keep an eye on the median age of most advanced populations that’s the clock lol

    • HawtP0tat0@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      Curious because as gen z the climate change end of the world has been moving back consistently for me until about covid. My first memories was 2010 then it got pushed to 2012 then 2016, 2018, 2025, 2030, to 2040 and last I heard right before covid it back down to 2035. Could just be I was surrounded by propaganda though.

      • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        Idk what you are referring to but maybe it is the point of no return that people have been talking about? Like we have until such time to act? But they also were trying to stay below 1.5°C but now it’s a pretty foregone conclusion that we will hit that this century. So now it’s 2°C.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 days ago

        You’re looking at cultural hysteria 'end if the world’s, not the very real oncoming collapse of our biosphere.

        Nutters always think the world is ending, and they e always got to push it back when their mental illness doesn’t come through.

        But in this case, we have models that, as they are refined, show us just how hopeful the previous “worst case” projections were.

    • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      So am I dude… so am i…

      Just learned there’s some island town in Virginia(?) that lost like 55% of its land mass to climate change and they voted 88% republican in the last election. Seems like most people will simply not understand, even after it’s too late they’ll blame the wrong thing.

      Kinda blackpilling but it really does seem like a large swath of the population are more akin to cattle than actual humans.

  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    13 days ago

    Same thing that happens to the people who have no savings now when they reach state retirement age. They simply can’t afford to, and have to continue working.

    Unfortunately retirement is as much a financial state as it is an age.

  • febra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    12 days ago

    That’s why the western world is racing towards fascism.

    It’s either socialism or barbarism, as Rosa Luxemburg put it.

    The less sustainable this economic model becomes, especially now that the overexploited nations of the Global South start emancipating themselves and the fruits of imperialism become fewer and fewer, the more state mandated violence will have to be exerted upon us by the capitalist class to keep us from organizing against them.

    There will be no retirement plans for most of us. We will die working. Those that will refuse to work themselves to death will be criminalized or slowly killed by the powers that be (existing as homeless is already virtually illegal). Those that are caught living in illegality will be put in prisons and will be loaned out to companies as prison labour (already legal in the US).

    That is if we don’t die in another Great War just to resuscitate the powers of the empire over the Global South.

  • SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    12 days ago

    A lot of them will work shit jobs until they keel over delivering Doordash or shouting “welcome to Walmart.”

    Exactly the way the system was designed.

  • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    12 days ago

    oh it’s gonna be a lot sooner than 30 years.

    The vast majority of genx have had their retirement savings raided over and over again. 2000, 2009, covid, now - each saw people raiding their retirement to make ends meet short term. It used to work in a 'well, we pull funds out of this now but we’ll be more diligent saving when times are good - "

    the good times for most folks rarely came back. I know people in their late 40s and 50s who have basically nothing, and with little hope to keep their head above water, much less pour massive amounts of their income into making up for lost savings.

  • isleepinahammock
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    12 days ago

    Long term, I predict a violent revolution of the young overthrowing the tyranny of the old.

    Aging societies tend to divert resources from the young to the old. People vote for their own interests. When retirees outnumber parents, more money goes to retirees and less to kids. This lowers the birth rate even more and continues the spiral. In increasingly aging societies, young people face the prospect of having to pay a lifetime of ruinously high taxes (far higher than their elders did) to pay for the retirements of the old that outnumber them. And they’ll do this knowing that they themselves will never have a retirement of anywhere near the quality of the retirements they’re being taxed to death to fund.

    Long term, we’re entering a very dangerous situation in developed countries. We have a trifecta of three dangerous conditions:

    1. The young will be ruinously taxed to fund retirements of existing elderly, a retirement far more generous than they will ever receive.
    2. The young will be completely shut out of political power due to being outnumbered by the old.
    3. The young are the only ones actually capable of fighting in a war.

    These are the conditions that historically brew revolutions. People take up arms typically when they see no hope for the future or feel they have nothing to lose. The young may not be able to outvote the old. But they certainly can outshoot the old.

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 days ago

      As someone on the downswing of this seesaw, I welcome a rebalancing.

      I think a big issue for working class folks who can even afford to prep for retirement is we don’t know how much we’ll need. And basically the fewer rights and social safety nets you have, the more money you need to attempt to insulate yourself from the ravages of capitalism.

      If we had more socialist policies to keep everyone relatively comfortable even the poor, then working people wouldn’t have to be so mercenary about building their nest egg (which will never be big enough to be totally safe anyway).

  • NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    13 days ago

    Hahahahahahahahahaha

    Do you think we’re actually going to survive the next 30 years?

    We are putting as much energy as 13 fatman bombs into the planet’s environment EVERY SECOND.

    The only time in the past 25 years we weren’t putting energy into the system, and the earth could radiate out more energy than we put into it, was summer 2002.

  • SuiXi3D@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    12 days ago

    I truly don’t know what my wife and I are going to do. I can’t seem to hold down a job for more than a year at a time, and when I do have work there is nothing left beyond bills, food, and car. It’s just too much.

    • FosterMolasses@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      Just cause no one else has said it yet, that sounds really rough and hang in there.

      I’ve heard too many stories of dual-income households that still can’t seem to make ends meet inspite of everything. I wish there were some answer beyond “just move” I could offer, especially when there’s nothing left after bills in the first place to contribute towards an immigration plan. Take care of yourselves and I hope something manages to turn out.