Great timing and phrasing. “Be slow about slop development ooor… Burn everyone and everything!”
Easiest choice of my life
Don’t threaten me with a good time.
Right? Talk about not being able to read the room.
Lol easy choice
What I find interesting is that a lot of these changes which are attributed to the purportedly “inevitable” changes associated with AI (or partly with its not-adoption), are real consequences of climate change.
- loss of employment? Check.
- profound change to living conditions? Check.
- loss of labour productivity - including knowledge work? Check.
- threathening the stability of the world-wide financial system? Check.
- increasing likelihood of war? Check.
- threathening even the continuity of human civilization? Check.
- threathening the capability to compete on national scales if the change is not reponded to swiftly by governments? Check.
- Correlated with obscene amounts of wealth concentration, impoverishing the huge majority of people, and disintegrating societies? Check.
It’s as if AI is used as a distraction. Like the “accusation in a mirror” pattern.
How else do you think they will get a one world government? Cause the problems, depopulate the “undesirables”, cause conflict, and offer a solution to fix what you have created. Not a hard concept. The only way people will accept a totalitarian techno-fascist one world government is with an overwhelming catastrophe.
So no AI then, eh! Eh?
I’d pay good money to rid the world of AI
Damn I don’t know, let me ask chatgpt.
They said they’d love me more if I syntax error input new token so that’s what I live by
Hmmmmm lower electric bills for our countries electorate OR giant buildings they hate that pollute their water, give them ill health from noise pollution, and take their jobs?
Not true at all. AI can and should be running on renewables alone.
Yes, Euria and many others in Europa are already doing it.
The Problem is not AI but how Datacenters are used in USA.
And closed-loop cooling. But then it will still emit heat, which should be captured in a downstream process.
False dichotomy
Yeah we can have a global climate disaster without AI too dudes. We have options [jazz hands emoji dot png]
Cool, fuck off then.
I mean that’s an easy choice, but also no fucking way. Rich pricks would pay for data centers even if they had to run them exclusively off renewables. This is a bluff.
They just say it. 🫴
I want newer, cleaner, superior technology made with the help of AI to lessen, stop or even reverse Climate Change.
Also my Room is to damn hot! XD
How is a token predictor that can only regurgitate old ideas going to invent something new?
I asked ai to refute this argument, but if you say these false things today, more than 4 year after the chatgpt moment then im probably wasting our time anyway.
politico
ewww
I’ve started playing around with ollama on my PC. The models I’ve tried so far are hardly comparable to Claude but also aren’t completely useless. If performance keeps improving, and hardware does as well, why rush it? We could accomplish similar results while spending a fractions of what others are spending.
The work I need AI to do is not on my computer. It’s my dishes.
Hey, so, I have great news for you about washing dishes…
That computer picking them off the table, washing them, abs putting them away?
Brain drain and Jobs. China and USA are already releasing less open models and now with fable5 ban for forwign nationals including green card workers a new escalation tier is reached.
