Whether to fix the old one or build a new one, we should have an official residence for the country’s grand poohbah. I like that Carney is seeking design suggestions from the populace.
He’s a prime minister, not a king. He should have a more humble housing imo.
It’s not “his”, it’s the People’s house. While I want a shining jewel of architecture to show the world I find it hard to disagree with you.
I don’t disagree with you either. I want Canada to shine on the world stage as well. It’s nice to show off our architectural prowess and how we can achieve great things. But they’re just monuments.
But I’d rather it shone like the Scandinavian countries and their socialist policies and how they treat the roles of government representatives as actual civil workers than some kind of elite position of power and control.
agreed
It would make a nice museum, and they could have regular tours.
That’s how it used to be, I believe. I mean it was the resident of the PM but there were also tours. Though I doubt now with all the fear of terrorism that they would allow visits again.
The headline made me hope for a minute we were turning it into a museum, affordable housing, gifting it to a local housing co-op, or shelter program or something.
At least it’s a fundraiser. Good move in that regard, and very smart to make the donor list public.
For anyone scrolling by curious about the history of 24 Sussex:
The 34-room mansion was built on a cliff overlooking the Ottawa River in the mid-19th century by a lumber baron as a wedding gift for his third wife. The government expropriated the property in the 1940s to consolidate Crown ownership of the lands along the river, but then spent several years unsure what to do with it.
[…] The first prime minister to move in, Louis St. Laurent, did so reluctantly in 1951. Before then, Canadian leaders did not have any fixed address in Ottawa.
[…]
A rapid succession of prime ministers and opposition leaders in the late 1970s and early 1980s caused public outcry for repeatedly redecorating their official residences to suit their tastes using public funds. Mulroney, elected in 1984, tried to cool the controversy by establishing a council to advise on future changes to the houses (the NCC took on the responsibility in 1988).
But soon enough Mulroney was caught up in the so-called Gucci-gate scandal, when it was revealed in 1987 that the Progressive Conservative Party paid C$308,000 to refurbish 24 Sussex and Harrington Lake, the prime minister’s country home outside Ottawa.
[…]
It was labeled a classified heritage building in 1986, but some argue its historical value was lost when it was gutted in 1950.
In the meantime, ironically, 24 Sussex continues to cost taxpayers money. One news report from 2016 pegged the maintenance costs at C$180,000 over five months, including for electricity and snow removal. - 2023 politico
i didn’t know it existed until yesterday, I live thousands of kilometers away, I’ve never seen it, and I never plan to see it.
this house definitely does not belong to me and I’m definitely not donating money to renovate our millionaire PM’s house.
so stupid
“The federal government should only pay for things in my immediate proximity” is one hell of an opening statement.
I didn’t say that
i didn’t know it existed until yesterday, I live thousands of kilometers away, I’ve never seen it, and I never plan to see it.
Pretty much your thesis statement. In order for it to be worthwhile, you have to be familiar with it, and it has to be close to you.
Truly the centre of Canadian society.
deleted by creator
What do you envision as the alternative?
The renovations are for the next prime Minister. Whoever that may be.
You don’t think the leader of Canada should have an official residence? Like they should just be in a bungalow in the suburbs?
It is Canada’s house, doesn’t belong to the PM, but when they reside there it’s a daily reminder that while PM they serve Canada.
There are practical reasons as well, not all houses are suitable from a security perspective, so… do we spend to renovate or relocate every PMs personal property?
>You don’t think the leader of Canada should have an official residence? Like they should just be in a bungalow in the suburbs?
Yes.
Yes you are, every April
