CNN refused to broadcast President Donald Trump’s White House address on Thursday, July 16, after his “history of false statements.”

After the move, CNN was hit with a wave of backlash from viewers as many found the move to be a form of censorship. On X, one person wrote, “Unbelievable and unacceptable, no more ‘objectivity’ CNN has no credibility……all news outlets should air any President live AND LET THEIR VIEWERS DECIDE THEIR OWN OPINIONS OF LIVE PRESIDENTS NATIONAL ADDRESSES.”

  • Eldritch@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Nothing is ever unbiased. Nobody should ever assume it is. This is what allowed the 4th estate to fail. But yeah their failure was egregious.

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Right, but we used to have this thing called the Ombudsman whose entire job was striving to be unbiased.

      They did away with them years ago.

      • Eldritch@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t disagree, which for us is sometimes ironic. But I would like to emphasize and contrast your own words striving, not being. The sad truth is, even with the best intentions. We can’t avoid or counter what we are unaware of. Even without malice.

        But, everyone should absolutely strive to be as unbiased as they can. And at the same time understand that there is only so much they can. As opposed to what we have now. Which is almost completely sensationalized, poorly framed, and often purposefully incomplete.

      • Eldritch@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Extremely passive aggressive comment. But do what you need to. Outlets have always used things like omission, framing etc to shape opinion. The fact that there are so few now with even fewer owners has only exacerbated the issue. Understanding an outlets bias will help you identify that framing or intuit what was omitted. It should be a basic understanding every person should have. It’s the only real check that would keep the outfits as honest as possible.

          • Eldritch@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            If you want discussion discuss. You are the one lecturing. Do you have an issue with what I’ve said? Please explain it let’s discuss. You don’t have to be passive aggressive lecturing.

            • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.worksOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              You are not a professor. Lemmy is not your classroom. People here are not your students. Not a single one of us is required to read or respond when you bloviate. Nor do we have to entertain your ridiculous attempt to redefine common words like ‘lecture’ for your convenience.

              On Lemmy and nearly everywhere else in life, adults can choose to ignore you completely. Please refer to this message as needed when there is no response to additional comments.

              • Eldritch@piefed.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Yet you don’t. You just keep coming back with projection. Well here let me be the adult. Bye Felicia.