It’s impossible to competently read those screenshots and come away with the idea that, say, kittenz is “denying genocide” re: Pinochet. The others are similarly ridiculous, they just don’t mean thst at all.
Instead of gesturing to a post with like 10 screenshots of text, why not quote kittenz and say what you think is genocide denial.
Sure, I can transcribe the exact excerpts I read above:
Apologia A:
For example we objectively know that most of the claims against Stalin were falsified. Not to say he was perfect but even the CIA admits they falsefied it.
Apologia B:
Salvador Allende was a great democratic socialist who supposedly did everything right and look what happened to him
Apologia C:
[Captain AmericaCX image captioned with “No, I don’t think I will.”]
For example we objectively know that most of the claims against Stalin were falsified. Not to say he was perfect but even the CIA admits they falsefied it.
Literally nothing about genocide.
Salvador Allende was a great democratic socialist who supposedly did everything right and look what happened to him
Literally nothing about genocide and you seem to completely misunderstand kittenz orientation to Allende.
[Captain AmericaCX image captioned with “No, I don’t think I will.”]
Obviously a reply to someone telling them to stop talking.
So you have nothing. I think you should take some time to ask why you are so confident even though it really seems that you are having difficulty reading and understanding what’s in front of you. I don’t mean the latter as an insult, it is perfectly fine to not immediately understand something. The issue is that you act very certain about a topic where you are actually uncertain.
Removed by mod
What genocide are they allegedly excusing?
Removed by mod
The kulaks were not a people but an economic class, and a famine is not a genocide[1].
Where are they apologizing for Pinochet or the US? That doesn’t even make sense.
Both. Which is why I want kittenzrulez123 to counter log.
It’s impossible to competently read those screenshots and come away with the idea that, say, kittenz is “denying genocide” re: Pinochet. The others are similarly ridiculous, they just don’t mean thst at all.
Instead of gesturing to a post with like 10 screenshots of text, why not quote kittenz and say what you think is genocide denial.
Sure, I can transcribe the exact excerpts I read above:
Apologia A:
Literally nothing about genocide.
Literally nothing about genocide and you seem to completely misunderstand kittenz orientation to Allende.
Obviously a reply to someone telling them to stop talking.
So you have nothing. I think you should take some time to ask why you are so confident even though it really seems that you are having difficulty reading and understanding what’s in front of you. I don’t mean the latter as an insult, it is perfectly fine to not immediately understand something. The issue is that you act very certain about a topic where you are actually uncertain.
That’s not biden. That’s captain america.
oh thanks!
That makes the denials worse.
You haven’t listed a single genocide denial. None of these are genocide denial.
Are you doing a bit? A joke?
You see, genocide good when “socialist” states do it