• Carvex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    143
    ·
    2 years ago

    How in 2024 do we not have the ability to find and prosecute offenders of false 911 calls like this?

        • zbyte64Banned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          2 years ago

          And that’s how COVID became the #1 cop killer for two years. But to hear my cop brother in law recount it: “COVID doesn’t exist for us.”

          • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            2 years ago

            The right’s pandemic policy ultimately hurt them more, but given the unknown future cost of long COVID, it could be far worse for everyone than we realize.

            • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 years ago

              I’m starting to wonder how many of us have long term issues, or that issues that might get worse because of prior covid infections. I’m not sure if we have ever fully recovered our sense of smell and taste.

              My wife became sensitive/allergic to both dairy and soy since being infected last winter, even fully vaccinated at the time, though likely during the least effective period of our vaccines.

          • MagicShel@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            My father in law, who is a retired state police officer, lost so many friends to COVID. I think at one point he had five straight weekends of funerals.

      • vexikron@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        2 years ago

        Ding Ding Ding!

        I managed to quite royally piss off a paranoid county contracted bounty huntress by showing her Trump’s mugshot.

        Good thing she needed me as a witness.

    • LufyCZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 years ago

      If the caller has more than two braincells, they’ll user a burner phone, rented phone number etc.

      These types of things are next to impossible to trace if done right

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        Ελληνικά
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Nah, they get caught all the time. There is just an endless supply of brain-dead conservative cultist to keep doing it.

        Remember Cesar Sayoc?

        • LufyCZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yep, that’s why I included the two brain cell clause, covers a good 50% of the population, perhaps even more than that

    • xor@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      people who do that are found frequently… but if they’re not completely dumb, they would be untraceable. (basically a burner phone)

      i remember one guy, who eventually got caught anyways, had a swatting service where he used some aol service that would transcribe phone calls for the blind, and contacted them over tor…
      i think it should be hard for cops to track people… it should be possible to defy the gov

      e.g. if drumpf becomes dictator, it’ll be good to have a way to escape…

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Police are only obliged to protect private property. Especially large collections of private property. Not people.

        • Eldritch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I really appreciate all the people responding with valid well thought out counter points and examples. Not simply smashing the download button because they can’t prove otherwise but still don’t like it.

          • Edit I really appreciate all the people responding with valid well thought out counter points and examples. Not simply smashing the down vote button because they can’t prove otherwise but still don’t like it.
    • EatATaco@lemm.eeBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Almost any group is capable of having extremists who are willing to do something stupid. Being stupid as a response to extremists being idiots is exactly how divisions grow.

      • mmagod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        true. but quite frankly, if someone can’t at their very core agree to the ‘golden rule’, what other option is there? a functioning society is better off being divided against people like that.

        • EatATaco@lemm.eeBanned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          You want to be equated to the most extreme people who share your beliefs?

          • mmagod@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            a belief that they should treat others the way they’d want to be treated?

            this is probably a trick question so i don’t think I’d answer it correctly

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    2 years ago

    Why am I not the least bit surprised? The fascist right wing want their orange jesus even if people have to die.

    • zeppo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 years ago

      Their first move when Trumpy is punished somehow is routinely to threaten violence against individuals or just in general.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The incident happened just a day after Bellows, a Democrat, ruled former President Donald Trump is constitutionally ineligible to appear on the state’s primary ballot next year.

    When officers arrived, they found no one at the house, and they checked the exterior of the property as well as the interior at the request of Bellows, who was not at home at the time.

    Bellows’ decision followed a first-of-its-kind ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court last week that the 14th Amendment to the Constitution bars Trump from holding office again because of his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol.

    Bellows’ office said her decision would not be enforced until the courts weigh in, “given the compressed timeframe, the novel constitutional questions involved, the importance of this case, and impending ballot preparation deadlines.”

    He also called Bellows “a former ACLU attorney, a virulent leftist and a hyper-partisan Biden-supporting Democrat who has decided to interfere in the presidential election on behalf of Crooked Joe Biden.”

    Trump had demanded Bellows, a former state senator, recuse herself from the case, arguing she was too partisan and prejudiced because she had called the Jan. 6 attack an “insurrection.”


    The original article contains 539 words, the summary contains 194 words. Saved 64%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • zeppo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 years ago

      Trump had demanded Bellows, a former state senator, recuse herself from the case, arguing she was too partisan and prejudiced because she had called the Jan. 6 attack an “insurrection.”

      That is hilarious. She ruled that way because she thinks the J 6 coup attempt was an insurrection, but she should recuse herself because she said the J 6 coup attempt was an insurrection.

  • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    Thankfully I’m not in her situation, so i can’t judge her actions, but I do wonder whether it would be better not to give the perp the satisfaction of publication.

    I can imagine someone jizzing their pants over this article and their little stunt.

        • Wiz@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Your pea-shooters won’t do much against government attack against you. A drone could kill you, targeting your phone usage and you would never know it.

      • EchoCT@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Liberals and demsocs say guns are the problem. Those of us who know our history, know it always ends in violence.

        Don’t start the fight if you can help it, but damn well be able and ready to end it.

        The state cannot have a monopoly on violence.

    • zbyte64Banned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      People with guns still need a support network. Get connected to your local mutual aide network if you can.

        • zbyte64Banned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Doubt you’ll find something on this site: https://www.mutualaidhub.org/

          Locally for me it has been getting involved in the local community: maker space (we made masks during COVID), bicycle group, and a very radical church with a community pantry. But it sounds like those things might not be available where you are, so it might instead be getting involved in a foraging group or other local activities that make sense. Sharing local knowledge outside the Internet is a good habit in case if shit goes south.

    • stoy@lemmy.zipBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yes! Let’s pour even more petrol on the almost out of control fire, I am sure that will put it out!

    • Signtist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      The only thing a gun will do for you during a swat raid is get you killed faster. Some guy with a pistol doesn’t stand a chance against a team of trained gunmen. They’ll see the weapon, kill you immediately, and use the fact that you were armed as justification that you were guilty.