President Biden vowed on Monday to veto a House Republican bill that would provide $17.6 billion in aid to Israel, calling it a “cynical political maneuver” intended to hurt the chances of passage for broader legislation that would provide money for Israel, Ukraine, Taiwan and the U.S. border.

House Republicans fiercely oppose the larger bill, which was unveiled by a small, bipartisan group of senators over the weekend. It calls for $118.3 billion in spending and would overhaul some of the nation’s immigration laws to deal with recent surges of migrants at the southern border.

Archive

  • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    190
    ·
    2 years ago

    The president hears the people no longer agree with our stance on Israel

    The president changes his policies to reflect the will of the people

    This is how it’s supposed to work!

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 🏆@yiffit.netBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      93
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s unfortunate that I have run into people that don’t believe that. I once got called a flipflopper because I commented one stance based on inaccurate information I had, and was given new accurate information which changed my mind.

      People be treating reality like a high school debate club and just sticking with a position because that’s what they choose at the beginning. You can change your mind. Especially if it’s based on new information you didn’t have before.

      • Chris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 years ago

        Right? I knew that Gaza was bad before this conflict but I didn’t have any real information. I then went and educated myself and I have a pretty firm opinion on the subject now which is different than it used to be.

      • Randelung@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        Highschool debate club has failed if that’s what people compare actual debate to. It’s necessary to take a firm stand in a discussion, even being devil’s advocate is fine, as long as it happens objectively.

        But I guess HS debates just end after three rounds and then no retrospective happens about what stance (not WHO) was right and why.

        TL;DR HS debates were supposed to be better than this.

          • Randelung@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yeah during the debate you defend your position, but the retrospective after is lost. The thing that would connect the whole simulation to reality.

    • Thats not what is happening though is it?

      The republicans want to kill funding for Ukraine, humantiarian aid and better protection of jewish and muslim places of worship against US domestic terrorism.

      So they propose a “fund Israel only” bill, that Biden has to veto on and they can cry out against. He still wants the IDF to receive that money though, so they can continue destroying what is left of Gaza and kill and drive out even more people.

          • GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.caBanned
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            2 years ago

            You realize there are no “good guys” in that war, right? There’s a grey area and a shit ton of nuance to it all. Not to mention a shit ton of history. Only a child sees this as a “which side should I chose be on” situation, and then goes to the intern to beat people over the head with their choice.

            For the record, when I was much younger, I was an idealist also. And like the kids today, I also had no idea what I was taking about.

            • Nowhere did i say that there is a “good guy”.

              Israel can only continue to subjugate the Palestinians in Gaza to these inhumane conditions, if they receive continued support from the US. All public calls for moderation have been ignored or renounced, yet the US continues to increase its military aid to Israel. Israel is not only facing a case of genocide, where the highest court of the world deemed it “plausible” that Israel is committing genocide and also demanded specific actions and omissions to prevent genocide by Israel. High ranking Israeli officials, including the President, the Prime Minister, the minister of Defence and high ranking army officials have been explicitly called out by the ICJ for a rhetoric that is indicative of genocidal intent.

              If a child is told by its parents not to set things on fire, but at the same time is given another lighter and gasoline, it is clear that the parents do want the child to continue. Even more so as many other parents have told the child to stop and the parents defended their child against those people.

              The US has all the means to stop Israel. Instead they are enabling Israel even further. If you want nuance, don’t just look at the words. Look at the actions taken.

            • beardown@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 years ago

              You’re refusing to answer the question:

              What does Biden specifically want re: Gaza?

              • GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.caBanned
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                2 years ago

                I’m not qualified to know- which is why I don’t make assumptions. I cannot begin to understand politics at that level and what happens behind closed doors. And neither do you. I at least know that he doesn’t want genocide.

                But don’t let this stop you from creating a narrative.

                • beardown@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  So your point is that no one should criticize the United State despite the truth being ambiguous. Makes sense.

                  Maybe you should familiarize yourself with why the International Court Justice ruled that Israel was plausibly committing a genocide. Perhaps that would clear some things up for you

                • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  But it’s not just Hamas being slaughtered, all of Palestine is targeted by the IDF. There are other groups besides Hamas fighting. And there is one side who is stealing land and killing record numbers of children and aid workers, and has been for decades.

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 years ago

        Nothing, it’s an alternate usage like greentext from 4chan to show a summarized sequence of events that I’m responding to.

    • EatATaco@lemm.eeBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Superficially this sounded plausible, but then when I thought about it I couldn’t make any sense of it. Do you mind explaining?

  • kttnpunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    2 years ago

    I hate that the two are becoming more and more conflated. Ukraine is fighting off a invasion; Israel is invading and has driven the people of palestine into radical organization and direct action. These funds should go to aid and peace efforts instead.

    • dumpsterlid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Also Gaza is NOT a war while Ukraine is, Gaza is a genocide.

      In Ukraine organized military forces clash over territory with both sides fielding artillery, tanks, aircraft and other sophisticated military systems. Russia is seeking to control Ukraine and annex most of it, but it literally has to roll tanks all the way through contested territory to do this.

      Israel already controls and surrounds all of Gaza, it controls all administrative and infrastructural aspects of Gaza so much so that Israel was able to build a wall straight through the heart of Gaza just to fuck with Palestinians. There is no ground war in Gaza with infantry divisions fighting over territory, there is just Israel repeatedly dropping an absolutely absurd amount of bombs (dropping in several weeks on the tiny footprint of Gaza what the bomb happy US only managed to drop in a year in the Iraq War) on a civilian population that has no means to leave even if they wanted to.

      You don’t need to fight a war when you can just shut the water, lights and internet off to an entire city, you can shutter the hospitals with a lift of a finger. If there was a war, it was over long ago and what people call a “war” now is mere symbolic violent resistance meant to attract the attention of someone powerful enough to help (or stop). The thing that should make every one of us want to scream is the only problems the Israeli government sees with cut off water and let ‘em starve solution is that 1. it doesn’t kill Palestinians fast enough to sweep under the rug out of international scrutiny and 2. it doesn’t magically bulldoze the houses of the Palestinians killed and erased like a bomb does all in one go.

      Hamas is not a terrorist organization because it chose to be one instead of a traditional army, it is a terrorist organization because a war with large armies is simply impossible for Hamas to even begin to fight against the combined military industrial complex of the U.S. and Israel. I say “begin” specifically because in order to fight a war with a military you have to first bring together all your soldiers and the minute Hamas did that Israel would carpet bomb the map square of that gathering place out of existence. War over before it even started.

      I am not defending Hamas (I am so tired of saying this, of course they are awful) but simply pointing out Israel’s main justification for their genocide is that Hamas chooses to be a terrorist organization because they are evil and not because it is an organization of people who feel armed resistance is necessary (a sentiment Israeli’s should understand) and terrorism is literally the only armed resistance option on the table. It’s not like Hamas makes tunnels because they love digging and just don’t feel like fielding columns upon columns of 120mm main battle tanks they have in storage…

      What is happening in Gaza is collective punishment for the actions of a few, it is genocide, it is horrific slaughter and land theft, it is a disgusting rightwing fantasy of violence but It is NOT a war that makes the IDF look way too honorable here. Gaza is what happens after a war ends and one side has complete power over the other. It is closer to soldiers raping and pillaging a civilian population en masse in the wake of an invasion than a war.

    • CylonBunny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 years ago

      Also Gaza is the size of basically just one neighborhood inside of Kiev alone. The scale of two the conflicts are so massively different. Many Americans I’ve discussed this with have no idea how much bigger Ukraine is.

      • kttnpunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah that’s definately another great point. Ukraine and Palestine are both threatened by colonialist erasure, that’s the parallel I’d like to see drawn- they absolutely have that in common. Would love to see Israel and it’s nationalist government compared to Russia more often- there’s so much misinformation and misdirection in the news nowadays.

    • CptEnder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      The more I think about it, we should just airstrike all the Christian, Muslim, and Jewish holy sites in Israel. There now there’s no reason to fight over your space wizards. Problem solved.

  • Melkath@kbin.socialBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    2 years ago

    Ah, so he wants to make sure that everyone gets funding, not just Israel.

    How about NO MONEY TO THE MOTHER FUCKING GENOCIDE?

    • ra1d3n@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      2 years ago

      He is not a dictator, you know? The other side argues for only genocide.

          • Melkath@kbin.socialBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            The mental gymnastics.

            They clearly dropped the “the only good thing about Biden is that he isnt Trump, which is why you must vote for him” logic.

            You dipshits are just getting categorically rejected on that logic so you are getting more vague about it so you can keep trolling.

            • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              You are acccusing them of invoking a thing that only you invoked and when you’re called out on it, you accuse everyone else of “mental gymnastics”?

      • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yes, the lack of civic knowledge is sometimes frightening. I’m not one to say “both sides!”, but in this case, I see it on both the left and right: people who don’t seem to understand that most major bills in the US pass through compromise. This is true even when one party has a majority, because the US has some of the weakest party discipline of any system (eg people can vote against their party).

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah, what we need is the opposite bill: the one that helps Ukraine but not Israel.

  • GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.caBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    2 years ago

    Outrage should be reserved until it’s known what’s on the bill. It was drawn up by conservatives- I’d wager its purpose is to disenfranchise far left voters.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      2 years ago

      Anything drawn up by conservatives will be worthy of outrage. They’re not going to magically stop being monsters.

      • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’ll also be pork barreled up the ying yang.

        And America wonders why it’s debt is so high. :(

      • EatATaco@lemm.eeBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        This is a straight up admission of being close minded. don’t get me wrong, one should be highly suspicious for the reason you state, but rejecting something you don’t even know about yet is the exact opposite of being a critical thinker.

        • uienia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 years ago

          Being gullible is also the exact opposite of being a critical thinker. And it is being very gullible to somehow still let the Republicans benefit from your doubt, despite knowing exactly why they are why they are and why they have been doing what they have been doing for decades now. All the while knowing that the factors which makes them that way has only increased the last couple of years.

          But then again you are not really being gullible, are you, you are just being disingenous.

          • EatATaco@lemm.eeBanned
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            This is the same type of argument I come across when debating against COVID disinformation and climate change: politicians and/or scientists were wrong/exaggerated some things in the past, so that gives me the right to reject the facts now.

            When were really hate a group of people, usually the reason is that we are much more like them than we are willing to admit.

            • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              2 years ago

              Ive given the GOP rhetoric plenty of tine to simmer. I was born and raised in it.

              It’s bullshit. It’s a pyramid scheme cult.

              No matter what the words say, the agenda is unchanged.

              • EatATaco@lemm.eeBanned
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Okay you reject their worldview. What does this have to do with my point?

                • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  You claimed the reason we don’t trust them now is hate, hate that blinds us.

                  My point is the reason we don’t trust them is historical evidence.

              • EatATaco@lemm.eeBanned
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                The scale is inconsequential when it comes to ignoring facts because you believe someone lied to you in the past. The fact that this needs to be explained is kind of embarrassing.

                • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Scale, context and nuance is absolutely everything, thinking in absolutist black and white terms makes you a child that just parrots without an ounce of critical thought, assuming that statements that are applicable to some situations are right for other situations, this is self-evident to everyone here except you, hence you’re getting clowned on.

                  Hope that explains it!

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 years ago

          “Yes, the boy has cried wolf every day for the past decade. But it’s pretty close minded to think there probably isn’t a wolf this time.”

          • EatATaco@lemm.eeBanned
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            As I said in the other post, this is literally the same argument I hear from climate change deniers.

            When were really hate a group of people, usually the reason is that we are much more like them than we are willing to admit.

          • uienia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            2 years ago

            Republicans: *bigoted slurs*

            Non-Republicans: Republicans are bigots.

            You: Both sides are equally bad.

            • EatATaco@lemm.eeBanned
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              The poster didn’t say both sides are equally bad, they said the close minded people who reject everything because it comes from a Democrat are exactly the same as the close minded people who reject everything from Republicans. And they are absolutely right.

              • Honytawk@lemmy.zipBanned
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                2 years ago

                True, they just forgot to mention there are more conservatives than liberals like that

                • EatATaco@lemm.eeBanned
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Do you have anything to back that up or is it simply that you want it to be true, so you’ll assume it’s true?

  • CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 years ago

    Isn’t Israel the ‘bigger fish’ in their conflict? I don’t question that our status is “allies”, but it’s so strange thinking they need “help”?

    • Israel would have no chance of continueing its escalation with all the neighbouring countries if it wasnt for US military aid. They dont have the capacities to produce that many bombs, missiles, tank and artillery shells.

      The US needs Israel to be at perpetual escalation and war to destabilize the Midlle East and prevent the emergence of an unified arab bloc that would be the size of the EU, but control many of the cheap oil ressources and vital trade routes.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        Israel would have no chance of continueing its escalation with all the neighbouring countries if it wasnt for US military aid. They dont have the capacities to produce that many bombs, missiles, tank and artillery shells.

        That is simply false. Israel’s defense industry is one the world’s biggest.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_industry_of_Israel

        Israel doesn’t need U.S. aid. They just know they can get U.S. aid because they have the U.S. wrapped around their little finger.

        It’s a great con. Get weapons for free from the U.S. while selling your own.

        • In your article it states that in 2022 they managed to export 12.5 billion worth of equipment. Elbit Systems, former IMI had a turnover of 5 billion dollars in 2021 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elbit_Systems

          In your article it also states that the main exports and focus are aerospace, in particular drones. But for a sustained war they mainly need missiles, artillery and tank shells and bombs. Of course they also need to be able to replace destroyed equipment such as tanks and artilleries. All of these need heavy industries, in particular steel and chemical industry. Israel has been importing iron and steel mainly from Turkey. If Turkey would continue to supply them is uncertain. They cannot manufacture all of the stuff by themselves. Especially as their sites are easily targeted in an upscaled war. The US are currently talking about an 18 billion military aid package. So 150% of the annual arms export rate of Israel.

          If Israel goes to war with most of it’s neighbours it would be unlikely that countries like Egypt would allow for goods to pass into Israel. So the only way of keeping the war industry supplied would be by the Sea. But Israel doesn’t have a navy strong enough to secure the Mediterranian and the Red Sea. There is simply limits, to what a nation of 9 million people can do economically to supply their war machine.

          Israel is too small to sustain a war without the US, UK or other big allies sending weapons and materials for weapon production.

      • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Too bad the US power structure is tied to oil, it prevents our economy from shifting away from oil and freeing ourselves from the ME bullshit.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s even more gross if you read the article. Mike Johnson is saying Israel is “fighting for its very existence.” Fucking lying conservative trash.

  • HubertManne@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 years ago

    Surprising given the whole genocidin biden thing. is he fixated on causing genocide. this makes no sense unless international politics is complicated or something.

    • admiralteal@kbin.socialBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t. We got the biggest and most important climate bill ever, likely in the entire world, by getting to ostensibly package it as an anti-inflation bill.

      Politics is a game of negotiation and compromise. The same impulse as “nothing should ever be logrolled” is saying we should be entirely uncompromising on everything always.

      If Ukraine and Israel aid were not bundlable, guess what? We’d get Israel and not Ukraine aid. The more deserving recipient wouldn’t get the aid.

      • blazera@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 years ago

        We got the biggest and most important climate bill ever

        Nah that bill got ruined by “negotiation and compromise” and opened up millions new acres of land leasing for oil and gas extraction. We’re gonna continue breaking emissions records every year

        We’d get Israel and not Ukraine aid.

        Because we’ve elected zionists and russian agents. And because of that this bill is likely to not pass, and each side can point at a different part of the bill to justify opposing it.

      • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        The negative far outweighs benefits .

        It should be, but hasn’t since the early two thousands

        A foreign aid package wouldn’t violate it

  • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    Do it then. I see the lips moving and the empty promises made, so do something about it then old man. Trump was the same way. Just spouting all these great sounding things that the news print and then never doing a god damn thing about any of it. That’s what they do, they say things you want to hear. Then do the opposite

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        To be fair, some of the things he promised were good, like a superior replacement for the ACA. We just tend to forget those promises because they were so obviously bullshit from the moment the words left his mouth.

  • Alph4d0g@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    Imagine if we redirected that 17.6 billion to programs that would benefit actual breathing people in the US in actual need?