Blåhaj Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Neikon@lemmy.world to Firefox@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years ago

Firefox now has speed parity with Chrome on the Speedometer benchmark

mozilla.social

external-link
message-square
20
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • firefox@lemmy.ml
  • firefox@fedia.io
152
external-link

Firefox now has speed parity with Chrome on the Speedometer benchmark

mozilla.social

Neikon@lemmy.world to Firefox@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years ago
message-square
20
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • firefox@lemmy.ml
  • firefox@fedia.io
Steve Teixeira (@stevetex@mozilla.social)
mozilla.social
external-link
Attached: 1 image O hai

publicado de forma cruzada desde: https://lemmy.world/post/1376783

Thought I’d never see the day when Firefox would match Chrome on Speedometer.

There’s also a few other benchmarks got a sizable boost. https://arewefastyet.com/

alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • blanketswithsmallpox@kbin.socialBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Removed by mod

    • NiHaDuncan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s not even that Ublock/bloat is slowing things down, web sites are plagued by bad development and multi-standard requirements leading to tons of wasted processing time waiting for elements which eventually error out. I’ve analyzed performance on multiple websites, even big-name and high-traffic websites like Youtube and found that 60%+ of load time is just sitting there doing barely any processing while waiting for extra remote services to be contacted only to never load and finally fail allowing to page to go interactable. It’s like having a beast of a computer but forgoing actual RAM in place for pagefile-as-ram; all other components could be amazing, but you’re paying that performance tax no matter what.

      • PostalDude@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Why can’t we go back to php and HTML? Why can’t we go back to web1? Why can’t we go back to the days when the internet was an Eldridge city waiting to be explored!? ITS BECUASE OF THE FUCKING CORPATIZATION SOUL SUCKING MODEL OF THE INTERNET WE HAVE NOW!!! They wouldn’t let us go back even if we stopped using the internet all together becuase there will still be those users that are dumb enough to saty on and swallow ads! Do you know how much time I waste on stupid sites like youtube!? HOURS! its by design to, keep you addicted, unaware and numb, and you wont have enough energy to fight back! IM FED UP WITH WEB2! I’m taking my cat silanced ar and heading to silicon valley! WHOS WITH ME!? ITS TIME FOR CHANGE!?

        • baked_tea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          If you’re looking to get hacked on day one… go ahead lmao

          I’d suggest a good browser but I’d get banned here most likely

          • PostalDude@lemmy.fmhy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Ik, you’re right. I’m just so fucking angry.

    • nxfsi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      uBO hard mode + whitelist + LocalCDN. Everything loads as fast as network allows.

    • 🇸‌🇵‌🇪‌🇨‌🇺‌🇱‌🇦‌🇹‌🇪‌🇷‌@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m sorry, did you say you wanted to enable notifications?

      • blanketswithsmallpox@kbin.socialBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Removed by mod

  • DreadTowel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    Interesting. Why is chrome faster than chromium? I thought chrome was chromium with bells and whistles.

    • michaelfone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Predictive preloading has an effect, I’d guess.

  • Hazdaz@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Now do something about its endless thirst for RAM.

    • 🇸‌🇵‌🇪‌🇨‌🇺‌🇱‌🇦‌🇹‌🇪‌🇷‌@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Why the fuck is Chrome holding 8 GB hostage when it’s minimized??

      • I'm Hiding 🇦🇺@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’ve only got 8GB. Good thing I don’t use Chrome!

    • shotgun_crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah that ain’t happening

  • Rayspekt@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Last browser standing that will support adblockers in the future.

  • Tim Morgan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I can’t wait to fully switch to Firefox as soon as HDR is fully implemented!

    • Buttjam@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Huh?

      • Tim Morgan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        I recently bought two HDR monitors and noticed there is no HDR support on things like youtube videos. Chromium based browsers support it though so for the time being I’m using Opera GX.

        • QuestioningEspecialy@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Waterfox has had it since 2022, btw.
          https://github.com/WaterfoxCo/Waterfox/releases/tag/G5.0

          • Tim Morgan@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            So I checked it out and it appears it only has support for it on Mac. Time to continue waiting patiently!

          • Tim Morgan@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Awesome thanks for the heads up!

  • QuestioningEspecialy@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    …Why dafuq is the score inversed?

  • MeanEYE@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Removed by mod

Firefox@lemmy.world

firefox@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !firefox@lemmy.world

A community for discussion about Mozilla Firefox.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 36 users / day
  • 207 users / week
  • 640 users / month
  • 2.41K users / 6 months
  • 48 local subscribers
  • 6.3K subscribers
  • 463 Posts
  • 3.19K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • lightbeam24@lemmy.world
  • UI: 0.19.13
  • BE: 0.19.13-modified
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org