yes, you’re creating a derivative work that is entirely GPL. note that this doesn’t stop anyone from consulting the original since FOSS licenses do not have revocation. if they use none of the GPL derivative work they can still only abide by MIT. however, your changes would only exist in the GPL work, and they must be used with GPL.

the flippancy you find especially across threads on political news across the fediverse is awful because it drives people away without accomplishing things other than virtue signaling

The Great Gatsby. Its last page makes a killing, pun intended.

The MIT is what’s called a permissive license.

Copyright <YEAR> <COPYRIGHT HOLDER>

Permission is hereby granted , free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the “Software”), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense , and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED “AS IS”, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.

That’s the entirety of the text. You can do pretty much anything as long as you make sure the first line is still visible somewhere (and if you’re not incorporating/relicensing it into GPL, you have to include the MIT license text as well; I’m less sure about how this parenthetical works but I do know an MIT project relicensed to GPL needs not include the MIT text), which in GPL it is.

https://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit/

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#%3A~%3Atext=Expat)-,This%20is%20a%20lax%2C%20permissive%20non%2Dcopyleft%20free%20software%20license%2C%20compatible%20with%20the%20GNU%20GPL.,-Some

I fuzzily remember that it had happened

how did news of your union spread/how’d you reach so many people to join?
what has your union been doing to support you since you were fired?

it’s what it can be that motivates us

anti-electoralism is fully compatible with harm reduction, meaning it’s not that you shouldn’t vote but you shouldn’t rely on it, shouldn’t think it’s the only way forward, shouldn’t stop you from mutual aid and organizing instead of campaigning for some person

there are anti-electoralists plenty who don’t believe in harm reduction though, of course, and I agree with you on that

neither judging, nor enforcing, is compatible with true-anarchism

Sorry, I tried to stress in the postscript that I know this process isn’t binding. I’m asking how this process should be used in this case.

Whoops, I’ve gravely used the wrong word. I meant “restorative justice”…

I’ll check out these links!

I don’t see how that relates to the content of the deleted comments I can see from the modlog.